Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Don1

(1,652 posts)
Sat Sep 18, 2021, 04:39 PM Sep 2021

General Milley's Alleged Treason

General Milley did not commit treason. Reich-wingers forget that CONGRESS has the authority to declare war. If President Twitler McCrazyPants had unilaterally tried to bomb China, it would be up to soldiers following their oaths to deny him that. Milley is a hero.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
General Milley's Alleged Treason (Original Post) Don1 Sep 2021 OP
My question is: no_hypocrisy Sep 2021 #1
That's a fine question but... Don1 Sep 2021 #7
regardless of what else happened, it wasn't treason because... getagrip_already Sep 2021 #2
For a really good insight into this... AngryOldDem Sep 2021 #3
If TFG started war to help Putin, that would treason under any definition. rickyhall Sep 2021 #4
So long, Mom struggle4progress Sep 2021 #5
Committing treason to stop treason? Midnight Writer Sep 2021 #6
That is correct. Don1 Sep 2021 #8

Don1

(1,652 posts)
7. That's a fine question but...
Sun Sep 19, 2021, 10:21 AM
Sep 2021

there isn't even a question that it is treason against treason in this case. Treason is giving aid and comfort to the enemy, i.e. someone the country is at war with. The President cannot formally create war because that is Congress's purview. Stopping a madman wannabe dictator from preemptively illegally creating a war is also within the purview of following the Constitution and General Milley's oath because it constrains the Presidential powers to what they are legally in that document.

getagrip_already

(14,570 posts)
2. regardless of what else happened, it wasn't treason because...
Sat Sep 18, 2021, 04:48 PM
Sep 2021

We weren't in a state of war and miley was not aiding an enemy. It simply doesn't fit the definition of treason.

Now if trump had issued an order, and miley interfered, they might have an argument. But that is not what happened. It was merely a change of protocol regarding the chain of command.

Did he he break any laws? Dunno. Was it constitutional? Dunno. Was it treason. No.

AngryOldDem

(14,061 posts)
3. For a really good insight into this...
Sat Sep 18, 2021, 05:24 PM
Sep 2021

….read Chapter 17 of Carol Leonnig’s and Philip Rucker’s “I Alone Can Fix It.” Trump was basically installing right-wing nutjobs at Defense after Mark Esper got fired. People were calling Milley concerned that a coup may have been in the offing. A lot was on Milley’s shoulders right after the election, and thank God the man stood by his allegiance to the Constitution.

The days after the election sound terrifying. Milley is definitely a hero.

Midnight Writer

(21,672 posts)
6. Committing treason to stop treason?
Sat Sep 18, 2021, 07:49 PM
Sep 2021

If he hadn't stood up and trump did start an End Of Days conflagration, could he use the Nuremburg defense of "I was just following orders"?

If given an unlawful command, it is the duty of a soldier (in the USA, anyway), to refuse that command.

Don1

(1,652 posts)
8. That is correct.
Sun Sep 19, 2021, 10:24 AM
Sep 2021

That is what I was taught in basic training. Say "sir, I respectfully decline to follow that order as I believe it is not consistent with the Uniform Code of Military Justice." In this case, it's the Constitution since Twitler did not have authority to declare war but it's the same principle.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»General Milley's Alleged ...