stop calling them "anti-vaccine" or "anti-mask". that's *not* the relevant behavior.
these are horribly biased terms designed to cast their behavior as being a conflict vs. personal "freedom" vs. health.
but being opposed to getting the vaccine or wearing a mask is *not* the problem. in fact, it's ridiculous how far it misses the mark.
consider the following scenario: a man stumbles into a crowd and spins himself around and dizzily starts shooting a gun, randomly spraying bullets into the crowd.
imagine that the media then simply calls this person "pro-gun" or "pro 2nd amendment".
um, ok, yeah, i guess technically the guy is pro-gun because he has one, but... the *relevant behavior* is that he was **recklessly endangering the lives of other people**.
the problem isn't that they don't get the vaccine or don't wear a mask. the problem is that they *then* insist on going out in public, into crowds, and generally engaging in behaviors that recklessly expose themselves and others to covid. if they really didn't want to get the vaccine but had an ounce of consideration for other people, they'd stay the f*ck at home (like all the people i know who *can't* get the vaccine due to allergies and legitimate medical conditions).
so, please reserve the terms "anti-mask" and "anti-vaccine" for those opposed these thing but who basically self-quarantine.
the ones who refuse to wear a masks and refuse to get the vaccine *and* insist on mingling in crowd are *biological terrorists*.
that's the correct term.
= new reply since forum marked as read
…clenches every time I hear this. What’s particularly puzzling is that people do not do this with a singular subject. I’ve never heard anyone say, “Me went to the movies,” or “Her just found out she’s pregnant.”
I do hear increasing use of a newer atrocity - making a possessive out of I. John and I’s vacation was really great.” 
You can waste time on semantic gymnastics, the rest of us will stick with the established un- or antivaxxed.
But thanks. 
any day now. d