General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSen. Hawley's 'holds' on Biden nominees are hostage-taking, not policymaking
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) announced last week that
unless national security adviser Jake Sullivan, Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin resign, he will place a hold on all of President Biden's nominees to the State and Defense Departments. He claims this is necessary to extract accountability for what he says has been a botched withdrawal from Afghanistan.
The idea of senatorial holds is in some sense anti-democratic to begin with.Holds can put off votes on nominees indefinitely ... Holds are a mechanism for an individual senator, even if likely to be outvoted even 99-1 on a given nominee, to demand attention from the Executive Branch ... The use of a hold to try to force the resignation of a sitting official escalates the concept dramatically beyond its original intent.
Hawley, who supported former President Trump's deal with the Taliban and criticized President Biden for not pulling all U.S. troops out by May, as the Trump deal required, seems to think there was a foolproof way to depart the country without any serious consequences.
The Constitution ultimately empowers the president with the conduct of the nation's foreign policy; for Sen. Hawley to block President Biden from appointing anyone and everyone he wants is to thwart the design of the Constitution and to escalate the imposition of a hold to the taking of political hostages.
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/573096-sen-hawleys-holds-on-biden-nominees-are-hostage-taking-not-policymaking
Hawley, on Jan 6th, Insurrection Day
OLDMDDEM
(1,572 posts)Hawley has no respect for the constitution. The fist in the air says it all. In his time in office he has done nothing of use to our country. Everything has been to our detriment.
Walleye
(31,002 posts)underpants
(182,736 posts)What a complete fucking douchenozzle
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)themaguffin
(3,825 posts)Bev54
(10,045 posts)and taken a vote on nominees to move them to a full vote on the floor. Why can't all of them do that? If the person gets 50% vote in committee they can be moved to a floor vote??
The Wizard
(12,541 posts)Democrats have to stop wearing boxing gloves to a knife fight.
Kid Berwyn
(14,863 posts)How come the Democrats didnt with Dumpys nominations?
That Senate sure can be confusing.
KS Toronado
(17,189 posts)for the benefit & well being of this country. For reQublicOns it's all about POWER and controlling
every aspect of American's lives.
Kid Berwyn
(14,863 posts)I know President Biden is trying, playing fair and square and standing up to the VRWC, but perhaps our Democratic leaders in the House and Senate can think of new ways to help. Getting rid of the filibuster, say.
bluestarone
(16,900 posts)Use it against these ASSHOLES IF they gain control ever again! We need to remember all their bullshit!
hadEnuf
(2,186 posts)Destroy him over this.
Don't play nice with insurrectionist fascists. Ever.
budkin
(6,699 posts)What else is he to do?
ColinC
(8,286 posts)Will a majority vote be good enough?
lonely bird
(1,685 posts)Fuck him.
Aviation Pro
(12,143 posts)We'll hold you and your fucking fist accountable.
SouthernDem4ever
(6,617 posts)he has no right to be in the senate much less trying to block nominations.