Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,622 posts)
Tue Sep 21, 2021, 03:52 PM Sep 2021

Democrats to Move Ahead on Infrastructure Vote

Democrats to Move Ahead on Infrastructure Vote

September 21, 2021 at 1:31 pm EDT By Taegan Goddard 192 Comments

https://politicalwire.com/2021/09/21/democrats-to-move-ahead-on-infrastructure-vote/

"SNIP.......

Playbook: “House Democratic leaders confirmed this morning that they won’t be delaying the Sept. 27 vote on the $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill — even though the party’s larger $3.5 trillion reconciliation package won’t likely be ready to go by then.”

“This is a huge win for moderates in both chambers. That effectively decouples the two bills, officially spiking the so-called ‘two-track’ process that leadership hoped would enable passage of both while keeping the party united.”

“The obvious big follow-up question here: What will progressives do? Several high-profile members on the left are almost certainly going to vote against this thing — some, like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), have made their unhappiness with this new process abundantly clear. But the question is how many, and can leadership — and President Joe Biden — convince enough to go along with this new plan?”

......SNIP"

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democrats to Move Ahead on Infrastructure Vote (Original Post) applegrove Sep 2021 OP
who needs repubs when the biden agenda can be sabotaged by dems? nt msongs Sep 2021 #1
I mean, it sucks.... ColinC Sep 2021 #3
If they actually make voting rights happen, well worth the tradeoff. lagomorph777 Sep 2021 #12
Agreed. ColinC Sep 2021 #13
Look at the big picture. Pass what you can, and use your energy for big fights on the most immediate ColinC Sep 2021 #2
It sounds like there's a lot of backroom planning going on AZSkiffyGeek Sep 2021 #8
Agreed...and the prime mover is the debt ceiling IMO BeyondGeography Sep 2021 #9
Frankly, the debt ceiling is more important than the reconciliation bill AZSkiffyGeek Sep 2021 #11
Truth. ColinC Sep 2021 #10
Yup, our margins are so tight passing anything is a win Amishman Sep 2021 #36
Thank you ColinC Sep 2021 #37
Voting down the BIF would be a disaster for the Biden presidency. tritsofme Sep 2021 #4
So will the bill pass or is this the first step toward agreeing to the smaller package agreed to by jalan48 Sep 2021 #5
The House could pass the Senate version of the Infrastructure Bill and send it to Biden tomorrow... brooklynite Sep 2021 #6
That's assuming the Squad doesn't torpedo it AZSkiffyGeek Sep 2021 #7
The squad can't torpedo it FBaggins Sep 2021 #19
That's good AZSkiffyGeek Sep 2021 #20
It is far more than 'The Squad'. The Progressive House Dem Caucus is 96 members strong, and is the Celerity Sep 2021 #21
Almost half of the Democratic caucus are going to nuke one of Biden's main policy objectives? AZSkiffyGeek Sep 2021 #22
The first part has already had almost 80% of Biden's agenda 'nuked' out, and many of those 96 Celerity Sep 2021 #25
The Speaker WHITT Sep 2021 #14
"I am committed to passing the bipartisan infrastructure bill by September 27" FBaggins Sep 2021 #24
Context Context WHITT Sep 2021 #26
Yes, she did. tritsofme Sep 2021 #27
My personal preference would have been for Dems to work to make the child tax credit permanent... DickKessler Sep 2021 #15
There won't be another good chance for this for a long while, so, make the GQP vote against roads an lindysalsagal Sep 2021 #16
Yes. Dems can run on infrastructure in 2022. applegrove Sep 2021 #17
I trust Nancy Pelosi knows Mr.Bill Sep 2021 #18
There's no question that she knows what she's doing FBaggins Sep 2021 #28
But it does mean that whatever she comes out of it with StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #32
If Dems can't do this BlueIdaho Sep 2021 #23
Nope. We can plaster the possibility of great infrastructure plans and rural broadband and applegrove Sep 2021 #29
In a "I want what I want and I want it now" society BlueIdaho Sep 2021 #30
The I need society. applegrove Sep 2021 #31
The pay fors on this are infuriating dsc Sep 2021 #33
Not To Mention WHITT Sep 2021 #34
So Far WHITT Sep 2021 #35

ColinC

(8,289 posts)
3. I mean, it sucks....
Tue Sep 21, 2021, 04:21 PM
Sep 2021

But it is a bill that will help people, and I hope this also means they are reprioritizing voting rights for the time being.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
12. If they actually make voting rights happen, well worth the tradeoff.
Tue Sep 21, 2021, 05:03 PM
Sep 2021

Without voting rights, no positive agenda will ever be accomplished again.

But color me skeptical.

If we can't get Manchin and Sinema on board with voting rights, America is over.

ColinC

(8,289 posts)
2. Look at the big picture. Pass what you can, and use your energy for big fights on the most immediate
Tue Sep 21, 2021, 04:19 PM
Sep 2021

issues. Voting rights, for instance.

AZSkiffyGeek

(11,008 posts)
8. It sounds like there's a lot of backroom planning going on
Tue Sep 21, 2021, 04:45 PM
Sep 2021

Between this, the reconciliation bill, the debt ceiling, voting rights there are a lot of moving parts that they have to deal with.

BeyondGeography

(39,369 posts)
9. Agreed...and the prime mover is the debt ceiling IMO
Tue Sep 21, 2021, 04:55 PM
Sep 2021

Mitch gave Manchin and Sinema all the leverage they need when he said we’ll have to raise without a single R vote.

AZSkiffyGeek

(11,008 posts)
11. Frankly, the debt ceiling is more important than the reconciliation bill
Tue Sep 21, 2021, 04:59 PM
Sep 2021

And maybe that's the play - reform the filibuster on the debt ceiling then move forward on other items.

Amishman

(5,555 posts)
36. Yup, our margins are so tight passing anything is a win
Wed Sep 22, 2021, 08:11 AM
Sep 2021

This is something that keeps getting brushed aside. While we dumped Trump - we came perilously close to full Republican control of Congress. Passing anything is a win.

The other thing is I suspect our own overall body of Senators and Reps have a wider ideological range than DU - and we often can't agree with each other on this site! Expecting everyone to work in lock step isn't reasonable

tritsofme

(17,376 posts)
4. Voting down the BIF would be a disaster for the Biden presidency.
Tue Sep 21, 2021, 04:21 PM
Sep 2021

Democrats should send the bill to his desk on Monday, without delay or acrimony.

jalan48

(13,859 posts)
5. So will the bill pass or is this the first step toward agreeing to the smaller package agreed to by
Tue Sep 21, 2021, 04:22 PM
Sep 2021

the Republicans as well?

brooklynite

(94,502 posts)
6. The House could pass the Senate version of the Infrastructure Bill and send it to Biden tomorrow...
Tue Sep 21, 2021, 04:33 PM
Sep 2021

AZSkiffyGeek

(11,008 posts)
7. That's assuming the Squad doesn't torpedo it
Tue Sep 21, 2021, 04:42 PM
Sep 2021

But if it's bipartisan, there may be some Rs that we can peel for it. Unless they're all butthurt about the reconciliation bill and vote no out of spite (probably).

FBaggins

(26,728 posts)
19. The squad can't torpedo it
Tue Sep 21, 2021, 06:31 PM
Sep 2021

The majority of the CPC that they claimed they had might be enough, but a number of them have already agreed that “one is better than none”… the squad alone can’t do it.

Celerity

(43,318 posts)
21. It is far more than 'The Squad'. The Progressive House Dem Caucus is 96 members strong, and is the
Tue Sep 21, 2021, 06:36 PM
Sep 2021

biggest single Dem Caucus in Congress.

Their huge fear is that the minute that the massively stripped down b-partisan bill is passed, almost all leverage to get even a somewhat reduced Reconciliation bill goes poof.

Even IF Manchin and Sinema do not push it off until 2022, it may well have $2 to 2.5 trillion stripped out from it as well. Almost all the climate change/green jobs/tech/renewables parts are gone from the bi-partisan bill, and Manchin is gunning to do the same for the reconciliation bill. Plus a shedload more of cuts.

Do not forget that $2.05 trillion was already stripped out of Biden's proposal for the bi-partisan bill, total new infrastructure spending is only $550 billion (the other $650 billion is just renewal of old already-passed spending programmes under Trump and Moscow McTurtle).

The Infrastructure Plan: What’s In and What’s Out (it's brutal)

Biden's original plan:



What was left after they took a 2 trillion USD hatchet to it




They already chopped almost EIGHTY percent of actual new spending out of the hard infrastructure bill

and now Manchin wants to chop another almost 60 to 70% out of the even bigger bill, one that needs ZERO Rethugs votes to pass


The total new spending on Biden's original 2 bill proposals (hard and human) was $6.1 trillion.

IF Manchin and Sinema stick to their guns and chop out $2 trillion to $2.5 trillion of of the reconciliation bill, then you are looking at a total new spend for both bills of only $1.55 trillion to $2.05 trillion instead of $6.1 trillion.

That is a truly massive 2/3rds to 3/4ers total reduction in new spending, and the vast majority will be from the parts the largest single Democratic caucus in the House (the 96 person-strong Progressive Caucus) all desperately wanted, especially things to address climate change and to help working class Americans. Pete DeFazio, the Chair of the House Transportation Committee has been very, very unhappy for ages about what the bi-partisan Senators did.

I can see many of the 96 members of the Progressive Caucus (far beyond just The Squad) going bonkers if Manchin and Sinema (as the major Dem players in the 2 guttings) succeed in stripping out 4 to 4.5 trillion USD between the 2 bills.

It may put both bills at risk, and then all hell will break loose between the 2 sides (potentially the 96 House progs versus Manchin and Sinema in the Senate, plus the 10 renegade conservadem Problems Solver types in the House).

There is a way, IF Pelosi can pare down the dissenting progs to say 10, 20, maybe even 30 and THEN enough frontline 'psuedo-moderate' Rethugs vote for the bi-partisan bill only, in order to pass it. There is a problem (of course there is, lol) with that as well, as the House Rethugs (plus the fuckstick Trump) are going full bore to try and threaten any and all House Rethugs who may vote for the bi-partisan bill:

GOP pressure to block bipartisan infrastructure bill builds in the House

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/09/07/politics/bipartisan-infrastructure-bill-republican-support/index.html

Speaker Pelosi is DEFFO trying to make 10,000 angels dance on the head of a pin. She is probably the only person on the planet (zero hyperbole) who can get both bills passed in the House.

AZSkiffyGeek

(11,008 posts)
22. Almost half of the Democratic caucus are going to nuke one of Biden's main policy objectives?
Tue Sep 21, 2021, 06:40 PM
Sep 2021

If that's the case then we deserve the beating we would get in 2022.

Celerity

(43,318 posts)
25. The first part has already had almost 80% of Biden's agenda 'nuked' out, and many of those 96
Tue Sep 21, 2021, 06:56 PM
Sep 2021

members look at it as if they do not pass both bills at the same time, the other bill will have another $2 to 2.5 trillion 'nuked' out.

You are making an assumption that not passing the bi-partisan bill first means it is dead. It is not. What is dead, however, is pretty much any real leverage Biden and the rest of the caucus have to ensure a far better reconciliation bill.

Spread out over 10 years, the bi-partisan bill has only $55 billion per year in new spend on Biden's agenda, with vast parts completely or nearly completely expunged.

55 billion usd per year.

In 2020 the US government total spend was basically 120 TIMES larger.

https://datalab.usaspending.gov/americas-finance-guide/spending/




FBaggins

(26,728 posts)
24. "I am committed to passing the bipartisan infrastructure bill by September 27"
Tue Sep 21, 2021, 06:45 PM
Sep 2021

Sure sounds like a commitment to whip the results

tritsofme

(17,376 posts)
27. Yes, she did.
Tue Sep 21, 2021, 07:18 PM
Sep 2021
I am committing to pass the bipartisan infrastructure bill by September 27. I do so with a commitment to rally House Democratic support for its passage.

DickKessler

(364 posts)
15. My personal preference would have been for Dems to work to make the child tax credit permanent...
Tue Sep 21, 2021, 05:54 PM
Sep 2021

along with more COVID relief.

I'm not a big fan of these massive bills that take forever to negotiate. President Biden and the Democrats in general need more wins. But that's just my opinion, YMMV.

lindysalsagal

(20,670 posts)
16. There won't be another good chance for this for a long while, so, make the GQP vote against roads an
Tue Sep 21, 2021, 06:02 PM
Sep 2021

and bridges. Either way, dems win politically, and if they don't try, everyone loses in infrastructure disasters.

FBaggins

(26,728 posts)
28. There's no question that she knows what she's doing
Tue Sep 21, 2021, 08:15 PM
Sep 2021

That, however, does not mean that she can always get what we/she wants in every circumstance.

 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
32. But it does mean that whatever she comes out of it with
Tue Sep 21, 2021, 08:56 PM
Sep 2021

is the absolute most that was possible to get.

applegrove

(118,622 posts)
29. Nope. We can plaster the possibility of great infrastructure plans and rural broadband and
Tue Sep 21, 2021, 08:29 PM
Sep 2021

lower drug prices as something the GOP destroyed a chance at but democrats can and will do with your vote.

dsc

(52,155 posts)
33. The pay fors on this are infuriating
Tue Sep 21, 2021, 08:58 PM
Sep 2021

Not one cent, not a single, solitary cent comes from the upper class. It is all from the poor and middle class or from the sale of assets.

Repurposing of unused COVID relief
$210.0B
February 2021 C-band auction
$67.0B
Economic growth (33% return on investment in infrastructure projects)
$56.0B
States returning unused federal unemployment supplement
$53.0B
Delaying Medicare Part D rebate rule
$51.0B
Applying information reporting requirements to cryptocurrency
$28.0B
Extending fees on GSEs
$21.0B
Sales of future spectrum auctions
$20.0B
Reinstating Superfund fees
$14.4B
Mandatory sequester
$8.7B
Extending customs user fees
$6.0B
Sales from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve
$6.0B
Reducing Medicare spending on discarded medications
$3.0B
Extending available interest rate smoothing options for defined benefit pension plans
$2.9B

Sorry one exception to that, the super fund fees. The rest is sale of assets, repurposed funds, or cuts in benefits to the middle and lower classes. And unless you drive, you are basically getting jack shit from this bill.

WHITT

(2,868 posts)
34. Not To Mention
Wed Sep 22, 2021, 07:54 AM
Sep 2021

* IT STEALS MONEY from the Education Stabilization Fund.

* IT STEALS MONEY from relief for airline workers.

* IT STEALS MONEY from the Economic Injury Disaster Loan program for small businesses and nonprofit groups.

* IT STEALS MONEY from the Paycheck Protection Program.


The bill also promotes corporate welfare they call 'public/private partnerships', where they build roads, but charge tolls that consumers have to pay to the corporations for the rest of their lives, build bridges and charge tolls that consumers have to pay to the corporations for the rest of their lives, take water owned by communities and then sell it back to them at greatly inflated prices for the rest of their lives.

AND, according to the EPA, the $15 billion they propose to spend on replacing lead pipes, will replace LESS THAN A THIRD of all the lead pipes in the country. Of course, that means MORE THAN TWO-THIRDS of communities will continue to drink lead-contaminated water.

Of course, much of this is NOT paid for, and will add hundreds of billions to the federal debt.

WHITT

(2,868 posts)
35. So Far
Wed Sep 22, 2021, 08:03 AM
Sep 2021
HALF of the 96 member House Progressive Caucus is down with voting no if the corporate Dems follow-through with their Repub tactic of, just vote for our anti-worker, anti-consumer, corporate Repub bill which benefits the Rich & Corporate, and we'll get to your [FILL IN THE BLANK] in the For The People bill later.

Sorry, Charlie Brown is gonna tell Lucy where she can stick that bill.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democrats to Move Ahead o...