General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsseabeyond
(110,159 posts)maybe the women are merely in the army to be....
fucked.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=1588323
Xedniw
(134 posts)And I alerted on it. I agree with you about the spirit of it.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)is totally overlooked.
just fuckin amazing.
thank you.
Xedniw
(134 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)and thank you.
that is a very good post and much appreciated. and i have bdays.... today. and hubby on the way out of town. so will have to get back to it.
but, thank you.
Xedniw
(134 posts)And true.
aaaaaa5a
(4,667 posts)shouldn't it be..... And yet,
Your poster has a good message, thats the only reason I have turned into the dreaded grammar police.
Playinghardball
(11,665 posts)surrealAmerican
(11,362 posts)... where women are guaranteed the same wage for the same job.
Xedniw
(134 posts)Also, when these women get home, they face the good old American workplace that wants to pay them less than men, despite their service.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Barring women from some "combat specialities" isn't a pay for performance issue, rather it's an advancement issue. Not allowing women to serve in the specialties make it harder for them to advance to higher ranks, which in the long run, does affect pay.
However, men and women that are of the same rank, same speciality and same number of years in service make the same pay based on where they are serving.
Xedniw
(134 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Dash87
(3,220 posts)their lives away.
Dash87
(3,220 posts)When trying to get help or justice, they're denied both and told to stop making problems. And worse, no one wants to do anything about it. 'Our military is absolutely perfect' they say. Only an America-hater would say otherwise.