General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe best and funniest nugget in the AZ Fraudit Report: Biden's victory margin INCREASED!
https://arizonaagenda.substack.com/p/we-got-the-senate-audit-reportThis is simply awesome. The Fraudit's findings have Biden winning the state by roughly 350 more votes than the official tally. So not only did those idiots not find the fraud they claimed would overturn the results of the election, they found more votes for Biden cementing his victory even further.
My sides hurt from all the laughter.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Bev54
(10,037 posts)LonePirate
(13,407 posts)Keeping the deplorables angry while milking them for donations may indeed have been the primary goal despite what they said publicly.
joshcryer
(62,265 posts)Out of millions. Let it be know America's elections are extremely clean, considering how large of a country it is and how non-standardized everything is. Full, standardized, national mail in voting would solve so much. Treat the vote like the census.
AZSkiffyGeek
(10,962 posts)lame54
(35,259 posts)brewens
(13,536 posts)did Biden gain votes! LOL
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,811 posts)Although the notion that the entire audit was merely a grift is more than possible. I wonder what connections there are between the cyber ninjas and the people in Arizona who hired them.
Deacon Blue
(252 posts)Sugarcoated
(7,716 posts)orleans
(34,039 posts)and his idiots will all agree because...they're idiots
DallasNE
(7,402 posts)The one figure that should be an exact match and is the total number of ballots cast. This report is saying that the hand recount overcounted total ballots by nearly 1,000. Logically, every tally should have been lower then with 2 exceptions and 1 would be different standards for clear intent. For instance, are there overvotes where someone, for instance, marked for Biden and then wrote in for Biden. One standard could say ignore all overvotes while another could say go by clear intent. That could explain some of the difference in total write-in ballots cast. The other is that the audit shows nothing on provisional ballots and that seems rather strange. Think of the implications on elections like Florida in 2000. It would also be interesting to know what the results were from the initial machine tally.
We need to see the detail but the differences look to me to be much greater than they should be, casting a shadow on the election procedures, including the counting of ballots. While this is the largest county in Arizona is it even half of the votes cast statewide? The shiny object is the net pick up for Biden. Do not be distracted by shiny objects.
.
questionseverything
(9,645 posts)To shut any lies down
Blue Owl
(50,238 posts)gulliver
(13,168 posts)If the frauditors had disagreed with the election results, they would have had to show the proof. They probably knew they couldn't do it, so they reported a tiny discrepancy but a "confirmation". I hope the AZ election officials and workers don't take the "confirmation" by a bunch of frauds as validating. A garbage experiment doesn't produce confirmation of anything.
Giving Biden a few extra votes may even be a way to quiet Democrats about a process that was essentially a misinformation crime against democracy, the better to repeat the process.