General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'You Tell Me What We Should Cut': Sanders Not Budging on $3.5 Trillion
"The question we face right now is: at this moment, do we have the courage to keep faith with the American people and show them that their democracy in fact can work for them, and not just powerful special interests?" Sanders said. "Let us go forward, let us do the right thing, let us pass this $3.5 trillion reconciliation package."
As conservative Democrats attempt to pare back the legislation, Sanders stressed that the $3.5 trillion plan would make major investments in climate action and child care, establish universal pre-K and paid family leave, and expand Medicare to include dental, vision, and hearing benefits. The Vermont senator went on to declare that the billwhich corporate lobbying groups are working hard to tank"should and will be fully paid for" by raising taxes on the rich and big businesses, and by lowering prescription drug prices.
"This legislation takes an important step forward," Sanders said. "It doesn't go as far as it should, but it is a major step forward in transforming our energy system away from fossil fuel to energy efficiency and sustainable energy."
Sen. Bernie Sanders on Thursday challenged members of the mediaand conservative Democratsto specifically cite which portions of the emerging budget reconciliation package they would remove to lower the proposal's $3.5 trillion price tag, which some lawmakers have characterized as excessive.
(snip)
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2021/09/23/you-tell-me-what-we-should-cut-sanders-not-budging-35-trillion
Just_Vote_Dem
(2,793 posts)Kudos to Sanders for fighting for Joe's promise
qazplm135
(7,447 posts)shorten the time frame.
Make it over 5 years and you reduce to under 2 trillion.
leftstreet
(36,097 posts)JudyM
(29,185 posts)They somehow prefer to believe their mealymouthed viper instead.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)McConnell wants to cut Social Security and Medicare, two fully-funded programs that don't contribute to the deficit, and he'd do that years before he'd ever ask his wealthy benefactors to contribute one more nickel to support the country that's made them so wealthy.
questionseverything
(9,645 posts)I am not a big backer of 3 year old pre-k
I also would like to know the details of paid family leave because when i was young there were many times at the restaurant I worked at, 3 or 4 girls could be on maternity leave at the same time.
If that little restaurant would of been responsible for paying their time off, it wouldnt of survived
Uncle Joe
(58,272 posts)"I also would like to know the details of paid family leave because when i was young there were many times at the restaurant I worked at, 3 or 4 girls could be on maternity leave at the same time."
Would the owner have to pay more in wages?
As you, I don't know all the details either of how the language of the bill turns out.
questionseverything
(9,645 posts)Or more( I have heard as high as 3 months)
To me the most important parts of this bill are making the child tax credit permanent and broadening what medicare covers for seniors (hearing aids, glasses and dental)
Fiendish Thingy
(15,544 posts)Employees contribute to unemployment insurance fund.
America can afford universal paid parental leave.
questionseverything
(9,645 posts)Of us , either have no insurance or cant afford to use it
Fiendish Thingy
(15,544 posts)Fullduplexxx
(7,840 posts)DET
(1,298 posts)I would imagine that there could be significant cost savings by means testing some of these programs. Personally, Im not a fan of paid maternity leave; a missing pay check for two months is not going to cripple most families. But I would like to see better options for senior care, which can exhaust family members (especially women) both physically and financially.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,544 posts)Creating a wave of homelessness and child neglect.
Most civilized nation have paid mat leave- Canada has 12-18 months paid leave.
America can afford it.
DET
(1,298 posts)America COULD afford it if we eliminated Trumps middle class tax cuts, made large corporations actually pay taxes, drastically reduced the obscenely large defense budget, and so on. But the reality is that most of that isnt going to happen. Another reality is that none of the human infrastructure proposals are going to happen if the bill isnt passed, which means making concessions to conservative Democrats like Manchin - whether we like it or not.
Manchin and other conservatives are demanding presumably significant cost cuts, which means prioritizing whats in the bill. In the whole hierarchy of needs, I think that programs to address climate change and the environment have to come first. Everything else should be prioritized by its ability to create the most benefit for the most people who are truly in need. Personally, I think that paid maternity leave is near the bottom, but I realize that this is not a popular opinion.
Ron Green
(9,822 posts)We have to figure out which ones to fix and which to close.