Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWho'da thunk: Cheering for Omarosa (Drumpf loses NDA case against her)
********QUOTE****
https://news.yahoo.com/bully-met-match-trump-loses-141034285.html
'The bully has met his match': Trump loses NDA case against former aide Omarosa Manigault Newman
.... The decision, handed down on Monday, calls for the former aide to collect legal fees from the Trump campaign, which filed the case soon after Unhinged was published. The campaign claimed Manigault Newman had violated a nondisclosure agreement signed during the 2016 campaign "stipulating that she would not reveal private or confidential information about [Trump's] family, business or personal life," per the Times.
However, the arbitrator in the case claimed "the definition of the type of comment protected by the nondisclosure agreement was so vague that it had been rendered meaningless," writes the Times. He went on to argue that the information Manigault Newman had shared was barely privileged, and said the agreement "effectively imposes on Respondent an obligation to never say anything remotely critical of Mr. Trump, his family or his or his family members' businesses for the rest of her life."
Trump cannot appeal the decision "other than on the basis of fraud" against the case arbitrator, leaving him with little additional recourse. Read more at The New York Times.
********UNQUOTE******
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 633 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Who'da thunk: Cheering for Omarosa (Drumpf loses NDA case against her) (Original Post)
UTUSN
Sep 2021
OP
pwb
(11,252 posts)1. So now he pays her off?
My guess. She is puke through and through.
lame54
(35,267 posts)2. Where are the tapes?...
She promised many tapes
renate
(13,776 posts)3. If her NDA was so vaguely worded, maybe others' were too?
I hope this means even more tell-all books might be coming.
UTUSN
(70,649 posts)4. Plus with all the lawsuits & armies of lawyers one'd think they wouldn't be so amateurish!1
Last edited Wed Sep 29, 2021, 12:46 AM - Edit history (1)