Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevilledog

(51,055 posts)
Tue Sep 28, 2021, 11:13 PM Sep 2021

We Underestimated Trump Before. It Didn't Go Well.



Tweet text:
Rick Hasen
@rickhasen
New ⁦@jbouie⁩, citing my paper on the risk of election subversion

Opinion | We Underestimated Trump Before. It Didn’t Go Well.
The former president continues to pose a threat because our political imagination fails us.
nytimes.com
5:40 AM · Sep 28, 2021


https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/28/opinion/trump-2024-election.html

*snip*

Now, 10 months after the election, “Stop the Steal” is something like party orthodoxy, ideological fuel for a national effort to seize control of election administration and to purge those officials who secured the vote over Donald Trump’s demand to subvert it. Assuming that he is in good health, Trump will almost certainly run for president in 2024, and if he does, he’ll do so in a Republican Party pacified of any resistance to his will to power.

The upshot is that we are on our way to another election crisis. Or, as the election law expert (and frequent New York Times contributor) Rick Hasen has written in a new paper on the risk of election subversion, “The United States faces a serious risk that the 2024 presidential election, and other future U.S. elections, will not be conducted fairly, and that the candidates taking office will not reflect the free choices made by eligible voters under previously announced election rules.”

Despite the danger at hand, there doesn’t appear to be much urgency among congressional Democrats — or the remaining pro-democracy Republicans — to do anything. The Democratic majority in the House of Representatives has passed a new voting rights act aimed at the wave of restrictive new election laws from Republican state legislatures, and Democrats in the Senate have introduced a bill that would establish “protections to insulate nonpartisan state and local officials who administer federal elections from undue partisan interference or control.” But as long as the Senate filibuster is in place — and as long as key Democrats want to keep it in place — there is almost no chance that the Senate will end debate on the bill and bring it to the floor for a simple majority vote.

It’s almost as if, to the people with the power to act, the prospect of a Trumpified Republican Party with the will to subvert the next presidential election and the power to do it is one of those events that just seems a little too out there. And far from provoking action, the sheer magnitude of what it would mean has induced a kind of passivity, a hope that we can solve the crisis without bringing real power to bear.

*snip*


2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We Underestimated Trump Before. It Didn't Go Well. (Original Post) Nevilledog Sep 2021 OP
The Orange Anus appears to be untouchable. CentralMass Sep 2021 #1
NO, we overestimated the intelligence of the American voting public. Trump will be gone joetheman Sep 2021 #2
 

joetheman

(1,450 posts)
2. NO, we overestimated the intelligence of the American voting public. Trump will be gone
Wed Sep 29, 2021, 07:27 AM
Sep 2021

but their ignorance lingers on.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We Underestimated Trump B...