General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe airlines are spinelessly softening their original demands that all employees be vaccinated
Southwest and American Are Making a Dangerous Mandate Mistakehttps://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-10-20/southwest-and-american-s-vaccine-mandates-won-t-work-unless-enforced
Covid-19 vaccine mandates are only as good as the people enforcing them. And it seems the executives running Southwest Airlines Co. and American Airlines Inc. could use more backbone. For inspiration, they can look to United Airlines Inc.s managers, or to mayors, governors and college presidents around the country.
Last week, Southwest and American gamely pushed back against Texas Governor Greg Abbotts effort to forbid companies headquartered in his state to impose mandates. Both airlines issued statements saying their first responsibility was to follow the Biden administrations planned federal mandates. In the days since, however, the two Texas-based airlines have shown less gumption.
Link to tweet
American originally told employees they would have to be vaccinated or lose their jobs, and eventually imposed a Nov. 24 deadline. It invited employees with religious, medical or disability claims to apply for an exemption. But Americans flight attendants union said management recently indicated that employees who have applied for exemptions can keep working a concession that weakens the mandate. Southwest first told its employees they had to be vaccinated by Dec. 8 to keep their jobs unless they received an exemption. Employees who applied for exemptions would be placed on unpaid leave while applications were reviewed. But more recently, Southwest told employees that anyone seeking an exemption would not be placed on leave and encouraged them to apply. I imagine that might persuade many Southwest employees who are opposed to vaccination to take that advice and dodge the mandate.
Maybe this shouldnt be surprising. Gary Kelly, Southwests chief executive officer, told CNBC last week he wasnt fully behind this public health stuff. Ive never been in favor of corporations imposing that kind of a mandate, he said. Im not in favor of that, never have been. But he had federal guidelines to follow, he allowed. My goal obviously is that no one loses their job. The objective here obviously is to improve health and safety, not for people to lose their jobs.
snip
JohnSJ
(94,647 posts)mahatmakanejeeves
(59,623 posts)Who do you think is fighting the vaccination?
As I heard on the radio this morning, the union members are saying to the airlines, "you don't like that? Okay, fire us. You won't have an airline."
Pick your side.
JohnSJ
(94,647 posts)airlines who are doing it.
RockRaven
(15,847 posts)With the impotent enforcement mechanisms pervasive throughout every government agency captured by the corporations it is supposed to regulate, lying/bullshitting is obviously the tried and proven method. Until they have experiences which force them to behave otherwise...
TexasTowelie
(114,982 posts)I think that characterizing their dilemma and reaction to the conflicting mandates, as (split-infinitive aside) "spinelessly suffering" is melodramatic. Pushing numerous employees into unemployment prior to the busiest travel season of the year (Thanksgiving and Christmas) will not provide any positive press for the Biden administration. Everyone deserves due process so we'll have to be patient.
Furthermore, it does appear that Southwest is taking the situation seriously:
The airline argues that an approved injunction would "put SWAs business, employees, and customers at risk because SWA would be forced to retract policies that implement basic CDC guidance and quarantine protocols." It also says the move would jeopardize its contracts with the federal government, its largest single customer, causing "substantial harm" for Southwest's business and all of its employees, including pilots represented by SWAPA.
The air carrier noted that the court does not have jurisdiction because the issue constitutes a "minor dispute" under the RLA that can be resolved through binding arbitration rather than a negotiation process that can take years to resolve. It also emphasized that the union has been in talks with SWAPA to establish a process for pilots to request religious or medical exemptions from the mandate./div]
https://www.foxbusiness.com/lifestyle/southwest-pilots-union-vaccine-mandate
(my apologies for the source)
Vinca
(50,699 posts)tanyev
(43,878 posts)bullwinkle428
(20,639 posts)case rate begin to drop, there's a certain segment ridiculously eager to declare victory and move on, kind of like what Condoleeza Rice was attempting to do yesterday regarding 1/6.
BeckyDem
(8,361 posts)omg.
uponit7771
(91,048 posts)... other employees by requiring frequent tests and that sounds fair
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Well, undoubtedly it will "improve" it. Hopefully, this will help make the case in court for victims of "improving" their chances of coming through without harm.
lark
(23,747 posts)Until the airlines pull their heads out of their asses & start actually protecting people by 100% enforcement of vaccine mandates/testing & masking, I will not fly. Life is too stressful for me to deal with any added stress at all and I can't risk infecting my immunocompromised sister. I am fully vaccinated, Moderna, and am just waiting for the approval to get through to one of the local pharmacies so I can get it scheduled!