Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat Romney's Hiding: 'It's the Amnesty, Stupid'
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-abrams/what-romneys-hiding-its-t_b_1908104.htmlPaul Abrams
What Romney's Hiding: 'It's the Amnesty, Stupid'
Posted: 09/23/2012 8:40 pm
Why does the press feign puzzlement about what Romney is hiding by not revealing his 2009 tax returns?
- snip-
His disclosure of his 2010 account omitted information about his Swiss bank account at the Union Bank of Switzerland (UBS). Why is the press not asking for this form? UBS was fined $760 million for putting Americans into abusive tax shelters and forced to reveal more than 4000 Americans who banked with them under numbered accounts.
The 4000+ Americans who were exposed by UBS were offered amnesty from criminal prosecution for tax evasion if they closed their Swiss Account, recalculated and paid all back taxes and paid a 25 percent penalty on the largest amount.
- snip -
To review, here is the circumstantial evidence:
i) Romney closed ONLY his Swiss UBS Account, not Caymans or Bermuda or Luxembourg. Hence, he cannot claim "bad optics for a campaign" as the alternative explanation;
ii) Romney closed the UBS account during the time required to receive amnesty;
iii) Romney omitted from his public disclosure of his 2010 returns the specific information about the UBS account;
iv) Romney took six extra months to prepare his 2011 returns, disclosing them in the countdown to the election, whereas he could have disclosed 2009 immediately with 2010, getting all that bad news out at once, during the primary, so that it would be ancient history by now. That is strong evidence that 2009, that would have shown the amnesty with flashing lights, was too toxic.
The press should be pressing for answers to each of these questions, as well as the over-arching question of amnesty. Otherwise, there is a real chance that a man who committed a federal crime and received amnesty could be occupying the nation's highest office.
- snip -
There is also some "softer" evidence. Why do the Romneys keep insisting that their finances were all handled by a blind trust? If they have done nothing wrong, why even mention it?
MORE[p]
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1259 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What Romney's Hiding: 'It's the Amnesty, Stupid' (Original Post)
Hissyspit
Oct 2012
OP
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)1. Off shore drug money
pointsoflight
(1,372 posts)2. I agree with this, he probably got amnesty.
That's been my suspicion all along as to why he won't release his taxes. Question is, how do we get that information out? The amnesty deal included the assurance that names wouldn't be revealed.
I was hoping Flynt's $1 million offer would shake something loose. The American people deserve to know something of this gravity when deciding on a president.
Mr.Bill
(24,305 posts)3. Also having the Mormon church find out he didn't tithe the full 10% required.
They are the only people he is terrified of. The will destroy him if his loyalty is in question, because they created him.
spanone
(135,851 posts)4. the truth goes to the highest bidder
dchill
(38,510 posts)5. MSM doesn't go after proof anymore...
They just claim that they don't have it. It's not their job anymore.
msongs
(67,421 posts)6. obama/dems have let this one go. not gonna happen nt
CrispyQ
(36,482 posts)7. It certainly appears that way.
I don't get it.