General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJudge Says GOP Congressman Can't Be Left Alone With Evidence
Judge Says GOP Congressman Cant Be Left Alone With Evidence
Undercover
The judge was so concerned that Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (R-NE) might compromise the case that he prohibited Fortenberry from looking at the evidence against him by himself.
Roger Sollenberger
Political Reporter
Updated Oct. 29, 2021 5:47AM ET / Published Oct. 29, 2021 4:50AM ET
Bill Clark/Getty
After Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (R-NE) was indicted last week for lying to the FBI over foreign donations to his campaign, authorities took the rare step Thursday of trying to prevent the nine-term Republican from tampering with witnesses or handling evidence without supervision.
The order, handed down by Judge Stanley Blumenfield in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, also reveals that the government is pursuing multiple related investigations involving other public officials.
In the ruling, Blumenfield sided with the prosecutions concerns that Fortenberry cannot be trusted to handle evidence about cooperating witnesses. The order prohibits Fortenberry from taking notes or memorializing the evidence, and even requires his lawyers to ensure he is never left alone with any Cooperator Materials.
Because these materials could be used to identify the confidential informants or cooperating witnesses," the judge wrote, "the Court finds that the unauthorized dissemination or distribution of the materials may compromise the ability of such persons to participate effectively in future investigations in an undercover capacity and/or may expose him/her to potential safety risks.
more...
https://www.thedailybeast.com/judge-says-gop-congressman-jeff-fortenberry-cant-be-left-alone-with-evidence?ref=home
malaise
(269,040 posts)Lots of folks will be heading for prison.
Take that to the bank
Ferrets are Cool
(21,107 posts)I will believe it when I see it.
calimary
(81,304 posts)But so many of these schmucks seem to be able to get away without facing ANY accountability.
When does THAT start changing?
rurallib
(62,421 posts)Are you pellucidly clear on that?
MagickMuffin
(15,943 posts)Exposing those who seek justice is their mission to destroy them first.
dalton99a
(81,515 posts)Backseat Driver
(4,393 posts)Legal "justice" has it's own singular interpretation/language from the bench, when there are teams that share "discovery"?
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/secrets
Any pertinent to this ruling: Ben Franklin's? George Orwell's?
Sneederbunk
(14,291 posts)MissMillie
(38,560 posts)when it comes to evidence, chain of custody is paramount, no matter who the defendant is.
Response to Sneederbunk (Reply #5)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
KS Toronado
(17,252 posts)I'm betting Russia/Putin, hope he drags down Moscow Mitch with him & others.
dchill
(38,502 posts)... with the evidence. Oh - does anyone have a Bic?"
progressoid
(49,991 posts)I_UndergroundPanther
(12,480 posts)OneCrazyDiamond
(2,032 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,176 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,943 posts)But then again, I would think it should be a standard order.
pecosbob
(7,541 posts)My friend and I were made to wait on the sidewalk while he searched my car. Well, the cop found an old forgotten roach in a small bottle under my car seat. He set the evidence on the rear trunk lid of my 1967 Impala and he told us we were going to jail. He returned to continue searching my car and as soon as he put his head back inside my car, my friend stepped up to the car, grabbed the evidence and threw it into the lake across the road. I was dumbfounded that he had the cojones to do this.
That wasn't our first or last run-in with Officer Skinner, but that day we did not go to jail.