General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDoes the truth even fucking matter any more.
We bang, bang, bang our heads against the wall. We factcheck, compile a litany of reasons why a Romney presidency will be disastrous. We point out he's changed his position 180º on any number of issues, he can't provide simple numbers to support one of his biggest campaign promises, refuses to provide tax returns to show he's been honest "when no one is looking". We know our shit, we're armed to the teeth.
This weekend I got a chance to use it when I was able to engage a Romney supporter in polite discussion. I was non-confrontational, but insistent. It ended thusly:
"Well you can make all those points, but then you hear someone else come up with all the reasons why that's not so after all. I just think Romney will be better for the economy."
northoftheborder
(7,572 posts)polichick
(37,152 posts)...because of the intellectual laziness of its citizens. What a tale that will be!
Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)Rambis
(7,774 posts)It is like Dems are weak on defence where do these myths come from? Harvesting companies, raiding pensions and shipping jobs overseas is great for the economy? It is good for the MittWitt economy but not the rest of us.
AndyTiedye
(23,500 posts)Amonester
(11,541 posts)We know that. They don't, or they simply *choose* to ignore that again and again just because they hate losing.
They just can't fathom the idea of being losers.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)mostly only to Democrats. That's why 90% of scientists are with us, and very few snake-handlers and teabaggers are.
The psychology of political ideology is a fascinating study.
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)No one could challenge Obama. What's happened since then? Absolutely nothing of substance.
They've picked an idiot out of a cast of idiots and turned him into a presidential contender.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)His money with us. Don't you understand? If Rmoney wins, we will ALL be rich.
IDemo
(16,926 posts)Many choose to align themselves with political ideologies and candidates regardless of facts. All part of identifying with a group.
edit - If this is the study I'm thinking of, it more specifically says that facts don't matter to conservatives, not the population at large:
Whenever climate change is on the agenda ... or whenever conservative politicians talk about it, all it takes is a look at the forums. It doesnt matter how many facts are enumerated, the contradiction remains - and these are conclusions that education won't alter. Quite the contrary.
This was the result of a study out of Yale University. Chief investigator Dan Kahan interviewed some 1,540 randomly selected U.S. citizens. The amazing result is that facts on specific scientific topics play no role when it comes to the more conservative segments of American society.
Those who show such resistance to the facts, interestingly enough, are not with low educational and social status. No - the more educated a person is, the stronger and more irrational is their rejection of scientifically-proven and peer-reviewed facts (conspiracy theories involving thousands of scientists are frequently mentioned). One cheerleader of the trend is ultra-conservative presidential candidate Rick Santorum.
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)pa28
(6,145 posts)Maybe you should consider turning it into an OP.
GitRDun
(1,846 posts)many people have become so intellectually lazy that facts for them, do not matter.
It is sad but true, and if that becomes true for enough people, we are in real trouble.
So far we have managed to squeek past Palin, looks like Romney as well.
The real risk will come when the liar is ACTUALLY LIKEABLE on the surface.
bongbong
(5,436 posts)> The real risk will come when the liar is ACTUALLY LIKEABLE on the surface.
You mean raygun?
bowens43
(16,064 posts)clydefrand
(4,325 posts)porphyrian
(18,530 posts)wtmusic
(39,166 posts)this person was ready to check out. She made it clear the conversation was over.
I know there have always been stubborn stupid people who are unreachable. This person was smart enough to understand, but was too lazy.
Maybe we do need wars to keep people interested in politics.
porphyrian
(18,530 posts)Many people shut down as soon as you mention politics. Others will talk about it all day, as long as you agree with them. Some people like to argue, and will simply take a contrary position to everything you suggest. Hell, there are people like these here. The best thing to do is not to break your neck trying to convince others of things, but to do the right thing yourself, believe the right thing, and be confident that you are right, regardless of what everyone else says or does. Most people hate being wrong and most people respond to confidence as truth. That alone will have them questioning their position eventually, if not right away. But, again, different things work on different people, so there really is no "one size fits all" answer.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)awhile back:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021156152
mnhtnbb
(31,395 posts)based on what?--and that's the end of it.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Horse with no Name
(33,956 posts)I got into a discussion with someone who was breathless over seeing 2016 and couldn't wait to tell me about it.
The sum of my answer was...is basically the movie reinforced what you already wanted to believe so that is why it makes good propaganda for the ones who are easily brainwashed.
That went over well....
They just simply don't care.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)It's like a news organization printing lying headlines then printing their retraction in small print way in the back of the paper. Damage done, it's the lies that get stuck in people's heads.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)"Well you can make all those points, but then you hear someone else come up with all the reasons why that's not so after all. I just think nuclear power will be better for the economy."
That kind of thinking -- denying the science of how dangerous nukes are -- is the same that says Romney will be fine. A denial of reality is the chief dis-ease of our society.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)I call it the cult of "but that's just your OPINION, man!!!"
lunatica
(53,410 posts)It's the craziest time of the crazy time of Presidential campaigns. That person has made up their mind, and if Romney becomes President through the ignorance of people like him they will suffer too. At least we have that consolation. The idiocrats will suffer too.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)these days is similar to your earlier conversation with a poster who refuses to read the report on Lance Armstrong: many people don't bother to do their own research and as a result end up only repeating what their favorite propagandists say. Once that happens, the truth is a casualty.
glacierbay
(2,477 posts)you actually tried to have a truthful conversation with a Rmoney supporter. No wonder you're doing this:
Here's your punishment for even thinking that you could have a truthful discussion with a Rmoney supporter: .
vaberella
(24,634 posts)hfojvt
(37,573 posts)My last attempt to show (once again) how Republican policies (including Romney's which are the same old, same old) are bad for the economy, got very little traction http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021566043
Whereas an OP that says "I fucking hate Mitt Romney" or "Ann Romney is a vile, disgusting excuse for a human being". Those types of posts get much more traction than any boring discussion of the facts.
How can anybody think Romney will be better for the economy when he is promising a return to Bush policies and those policies wrecked the economy?
RepublicansRZombies
(982 posts)They do not all have time to read the net and search for the truth.
WE have to do something to hold the media accountable. In order to use our public airwaves,
They sign a license with the FCC stating they will serve the public interest.
They are clearly only serving their own interests. There must be a way to yank their license.
We should at the very least protest at the media outlets, as is done in other countries.
Angry Libyan protesters storm TV channel for Bani Walid coverage (PHOTOS)
http://rt.com/news/libya-benghazi-tv-storm-947/
Protesters attacked the HQ of the private TV station Al-Hurra in Benghazi, claiming the channels coverage of the Bani Walid events was used to justify assaults against the city.
PufPuf23
(8,800 posts)Corruption
Scapegoating
Anti-intellectualism
Tribalism
Greed
Fear
These are the human traits that predominate and have predominated in human history on any scale of human society from family to institution to nation to globe.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)If the Universe is relative then so are facts.
Smickey
(3,330 posts)I know to talk about our lacking system of education is like handling a pin-less grenade with soapy hands but the many good points brought up here are an outcome of an education system more and more owned and/or controlled by the very people who would like us to believe their lies.
"Teach the children well"
IMHO if we do not seriously take hold of our educational system it is just a matter of time....tic..toc, tic..toc.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)The truth always matters. While it doesn't work for every case, it takes with a few. They're the ones who make a difference.