Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat Texas's abortion law has in common with the Fugitive Slave Act
Link to tweet
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2021/11/01/texas-abortion-law-history-rights-suppressed/
No paywall
https://archive.ph/gMxYd
The Supreme Court on Monday is hearing challenges to Texass antiabortion law, S.B. 8 a measure that not only bans abortion after six weeks but allows any private party to sue anyone who aids or abets the procurement of an abortion knowingly or unwittingly. By allowing private citizens to go after doctors, nurses, ride-share drivers and others, Texas aims to cast a deep pall of uncertainty and fear around the constitutionally sanctioned procedure.
Texass law has been described as unprecedented and inventive, as if the states legislature had broken new ground by granting private citizens the legal power to stifle constitutional rights. But these labels miss important historical context: Throughout American history, laws have been enacted to license private parties to suppress the constitutional rights of others by filing a lawsuit and bringing the weight of the state to bear on rights-holders. Such measures have been repeatedly used to keep down subordinated groups. They are far from marginal and their sheer frequency suggests S.B. 8 is no outlier but an indication that our Constitution has an Achilles heel when it comes to individual rights.
S.B. 8 may tap into peoples desire to think they are vigilantes, boldly enforcing their morality in defiance of Supreme Court precedent. But vigilantes typically dont rely on the legal system to achieve their goals (though local laws may shield them from punishment).
A more precise early historical analogue than vigilantism of the sort practiced by the Ku Klux Klan and its ilk would be the two infamous Fugitive Slave Acts passed by Congress in 1793 and 1850. These undercut Black citizens Fifth Amendment right to due process and the habeas corpus right to challenge government deprivations of liberty. Under these acts, enslavers could hire agents to search for people who had escaped to free states from slavery; they could then turn to the courts or later to commissioners, appointed by federal judges to condone the rendition back south of their property. (They could also turn to the courts as a first step before a seizure.)
*snip*
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 535 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What Texas's abortion law has in common with the Fugitive Slave Act (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Nov 2021
OP
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)1. I don't buy it. The fugitve slave acts were much worse because...
they assumed slaves were property. Which they were at that time. And no way out no matter where in the States they tried to hide.
Under the current law, women aren't considered property-- just treated as if they are as long as they stay in Texas.
Neither situation is in any way right, of course, but for completely different reasons.