General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumswhy I just deleted two op's I posted on the secret ceremony Mormon video
Last edited Mon Oct 22, 2012, 06:15 PM - Edit history (1)
(Note added at bottom)
It wasn't because I found out that the information was bogus. It wasn't because I felt that it was unfair for us to be posting this. And it definitely wasn't because I thought it was unfair politically.
I deleted them because, after some thought, I Realized I was propagating an old way of thinking.... That old way, is a way of seeing others as being separate from us.... Which is not what I believe. If enough people decided not to point the finger at another person and say that is not me.... Then we might start evolving as a people.
Sorry to get so sappy about this, but frankly, it hit me like a ton of bricks, I need to Feel like the information that I am spreading is moving us towards being an evolved species... Not the hateful, war-ing, selfish, greedy Beings we have been for millennia.
It's going to be tough Maintaining this Attitude for myself while posting because I get totally freaked out during elections... And it's very easy to get caught up in slinging whatever we need to sling at the other person in order to win. There is a lot at stake here but honestly, I don't want to win if we have to win by being Just as ugly and devolved as the other guys.
Wish me luck with this one?
Added note: I believe the actions of this religious organization and many other religious organizations are deplorable. Religion in and of itself has caused millions upon millions to suffer... However much of this suffering would've been eliminated, if these religions would've been inclusive and not separating out others. The whole idea of religion, for the most part, is to be in a group that is separate from others, everybody else is bad, we are fine.
I personally would feel better, focusing on the actions of these religions, how they hate and their Attitude of non-inclusion hurts others. Not how weird they look in their costumes and how bizarre their ceremonies are?
msongs
(67,421 posts)monitored, as you will learn from the door knockers who are peddling their religion because it is the best thing going around and all others are invalid.
the prophecies say one of the chosen will be president one day....and not just as a random event
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)We are, after all not just the people of the book but the Chosen People.
Just an FYI.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)when asked.
In fact, a couple that I asked wouldn't shut up!
No secrets there.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)the point, oh never mind, the OP did make the point magnificently...
And of course you have never met a Jew OUTSIDE the US, or read accounts of Jews early in US History, where they were spoken off as secretive and all that.
But whatever, carry on.
karynnj
(59,504 posts)In reconstructionist Judaism the idea is that chosen simply means that Jews were the people who accepted the laws. In a way this could be analogous to Democrats who said that America is exceptional when it does exceptional things. In both cases, it is through "right" actions that the group has merit.
I agree with the op's logic in removing those posts.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)If you put yourself in the other guys Shoes, you can see how they might be at fault, but they shouldn't be treated as not being equals...
Believe me, I think that there is ample justification for posting the videos and fighting fire with fire.... But we can be doing this forever, as I mentioned in my op, we've been doing this sort of stuff for millennia, and the only way to get out of the cycle, is to understand that we are all the same, period.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)equal. They removed and barred us from actual legal rights. Yet you claim that if we discuss so much as the facts of their rituals, that is not equal treatment? They put my rights up for a vote, kid. But they must not be discussed? Some really inequal treatment you are dishiing out there. They get to advocate for the inequality of others, but those others must not so much as mention their rituals? How do you work that out?
Would you have refused to march in Selma for fear of making the Klan feel 'separate'? I'm guessing so.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)separate but equal laws... or perhaps I am off in my history.
And the KKK was an organization that did not rise from Mormonism.
be critical of POLICIES all you want, but there are things I will not join you in, like creation of the other.
Now I am sure you are proof positive that because of this I would vote for Romney? No, we differ in way too many policy positions, but it has zero to do with his religion and all to do with his policies.
The laws to keep the races separated in the South were passed by Southern Baptists in many a cases.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Church policies today that are discriminatory.
Calling out a hate group didn't used to be such a problem.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)I will NOT join you in hate. SORRY.
I will join you and others in calling out the POLICIES that are discriminatory, but you see, INSIDE their own faith, and their own churches, they are pretty much free and clear... SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE.
This is right now heading to the USSC over a certain section of the ACA most likely, regarding the Catholic Church.
Sorry if I find it comical to stand against a hate group by creating hate.
OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)....that's where I draw the line, and that's where I become HIGHLY critical of said group.
Thanks for giving me and everyone else who disagrees with you permission to speak freely on this issue. Your attempt to quash discussion on this matter is laughable.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)and enjoy your hate. Goodbye.
I am not quashing anybody's ability to speak, but at this point, I shan't engage in your creation of the other, bye bye
(And for the record, the powerful Mormom Militia is posed to take over DC right now)
zappaman
(20,606 posts)The last resort when you realize you have lost the argument.
GoneOffShore
(17,340 posts)If the Mormons fulfill their prophecy through Mittens all bets are off as regards separation of church and state.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Oh they can be as free as they like in church. But the policies jumped the boundaries of the separation wall LONG ago. Mitt and Ann Rmoney haven't disavowed their church's actions. There's been no public pronunciation that their church won't influence their governance.
In fact, as just one example Mitt's record on women's equality in top positions seems to imply he DOES believe women are inferior (like his church teaches), just like the Catholic Church/Ryan's positions on birth control and abortion are completely synonymous in his legislative efforts.
vanlassie
(5,678 posts)"joining in hate?". It was necessary to shine a light in the haters of your people, wasn't it? How is this in and of itself hateful? We are the reality based party!
GoneOffShore
(17,340 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)shine all you want... it is so damn funny... but I replace a few terms and what is posted here regularly could have been posted at Free Republic, you read right, a few years back about Obama.
Sorry, I find this disgusting.
Yes, I will fight the LDS (and any other denomination) at the POLICY LEVEL. I will not make fun of how they look, or their religious believes.
If you cannot understand why this is a problem, quite frankly it is an ugly problem. You are now engaged in the creation of the other. Enjoy that... I won't join you.
And damn it, you do not need to create a slew of reasons to vote against Romney, his POLICIES, his KNOWN POLICIES are enough to tell me I do not want to vote for him, and by extension his policies.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)Cloudy?
vanlassie
(5,678 posts)If a very religious person, one who is a leader in his church, wants to be my country's leader, taking a close look at what it is he represents is my right and my responsibility. I am not making him ANYTHING by sharing what I found out.
I'm Not making him OTHER. But to be honest, from what I have been able to tell, the SECRECY of his church seems to me to be a deliberate "setting ones self apart..." as OTHER.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)victims of it? Nah, that could not be.
Not at all. I mean, we all know that minorities who have been subjected to significant amounts of persecution are always open and cheerful... yup, really.
Same as people did with Kennedy. And the, but the church is full of secrets... I have read the same exact crap, albeit in Spanish, over the Jewish Community in Mexico City. The exact same crap.
I disagree with the man on policy, I will not vote for the man, sorry if I do not join you in "shining light" and find that disgusting. I mean, we all know that the creation of the other never, ever leads to problems.
Have an excellent day.
The OP did well, learn from the OP.
trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)Question, do you think i should add a note to the op that i don't support the actions of the lds church? The whole point of my op was that we are trying to make them look different than us with these videos to make them out as freaks.... That's what I think is wrong with these videos. That's what made me feel uncomfortable. That's why I took down the Ops.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)some people, this is what is funny, are using hate, to speak against hate.
We have crossed some kind of rubicon here.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)are we not supposed to say anything about that? Its a church doctrine and demonstrably proven by Mitt's public and private service records.
Is pointing that out "hating"? Not only do the women "look" different in that video, Mitt also treats them different in real time.
But saying anything about THAT is hating huh.
Pointing out that gay people are not allowed in those ceremonies is "hateful"?
Frankly, if you are NOT speaking out about the Mormon stuff on that video, then I believe it shows YOU are the one who is moving away from progressive ideals.
trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)That can be one thing that can be taken away from this video that is positive, that they are Subverting women, And that is a problem with the religion as a whole. You don't have to watch these videos to figure that out. but frankly I don't think that's what these videos will do, I think it will just make Mormons look weird in the eyes of evangelicals. I don't think anybody else who really care.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)If a person is a racist bigot and just holds that belief they hurt no one except themselves
If they act on that belief then they hurt others, that is when it is everyones' business.
If a person believes in a god and live their life based on that belief, so what. If that belief starts to be forced on others then the others have the right to slap that person and belief down.
That is the difference.
I totally agree.
Cha
(297,366 posts)OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)...replacing our civil government with a Mormon government.
Not buying that, or the takeover of the US Government by any religious group.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)That's why I took it down, it's because I didn't feel like we were showing the problems with the churches inaction with others, And how hurtful they can be towards others, but how weird they look?
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)in front of the white suited man in a temple ceremony.
The video SCREAMS that out loud if you had any sensitivity to the LDS church and its despicable actions towards the GLBT community.
You don't think gays don't see that right away? Honestly, you don't see that right away?? Its visceral and ugly. And deserves commentary and public shaming.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)the creation of the other is precisely one thing I have been trying, unsuccessfully, to adress in the recent past and quite frankly gave up on.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)My main objection to the videos is that they were made without the permission of the people whose private activities were recorded, but I absolutely agree with you about the backwardness of xenophobia.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)AGREED.
I admit the curiosity was there, but what I saw was part and parcel of US Religious history... big whoopy deal.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)full participation in the world's doings. In 1978 Mitt was a 31 year old man with a high position in the church, he had taken that racist dogma to other countries as 'missionary' and he swore his belief that blacks are inferior again and again. I think that history of Mitt's, his own personal histroy, is very important. I also think that it is unlike Christian denominations as a whole.
Also, for me all their anti gay political activities when coupled with their secrecy makes them more of a lodge or club than a faith, I have no idea if they really have a religion in that Temple, I just see what they do in the world. Teach racism and bigotry, organize against others and boost the GOP. ARE they a religion? I have no idea. Their teachings sound like White Supremacy materials and Masonic mumbo jumbo tossed like a salad. I say they are a lodge, a club, a social group.
Mitt taught racism until he was 31. Big whoopy deal.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)with similar ugly believes
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)was a 'missionary' who carried those ugly beliefs forth into the world, then was a leader in such a demonination preaching the inferiority of black people until he was 31 and the denom changed it's tune. Feel free.
That's what makes this important. A man who was an open racist until he was 31 is running for President. The religion really should not make that fact somehow protected and misty. He was a man who taught others that blacks are inferior from age 18-31, as a committed member of a racist lodge, or club. They call it a church, to me it is more like the Masons without the sense of irony. A lodge. The Mormon Lodge.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Sorry if I shan't join you in the creation of the other....
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)revoke our rights. But that's of no concern, the real problem is criticism of them and their actions....
You said you had a list of other denominations with 'similar ugly beliefs'. I also asked you to point to ANY candidate for President who had been an open racist and advocated segregation until 1978 at age 31. You failed to show those things.
A racist and homophobic group is other from me. I am NOT that. They are that. I have zero problem standing separate from the Klan nor the LDS or any other bigoted group. I have no desire to make some show of accepting those who march against the basic human rights of others.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)but I will not demonize them, different thing.
I also will vote for RIGHTS, not against rights.
But this is stupid to the nth degree and smacks of... ready for this? JFK is a Catholic and will have to obey the orders from the Pope.
FIGHT THEM AT THE BALLOT BOX, FIGHT THEM AT THE POLICY LEVEL, FIGHT THEM, but DO NOT MAKE THEM WHAT YOU WISH THEY WERE NOT MAKING YOU LIKE.
Now if you insist, consider myself your enemy... since I will NOT join you there. For the record, I will not join anybody making another group the other.
But I am your enemy... since I will not join you in this very dangerous fools errand. And you know what? I am proud to be one. You know why? I know where this foolishness leads to, no mater WHO does it.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)from his governance.
Mitt Rmoney (and Ryan) have made no such assurances. In fact there is demonstrable proof of their church theologies are at work in their public political actions. From Mitt Rmoney's apparent lack of women in top leadership roles to Ryan's disgusting anti-choice legislative efforts, there's tangible evidence that these two men do NOT separate their religion from the state. In fact, they'd tie the two closer together stepping over important constitutional lines.
The Mormon church is a hate group. Calling them out for that isn't making them "the other" its simply pointing out facts.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)I will no longer engage the haters... and that is what you are doing... enjoy the hate.
(Perhaps it is coming from family history)
Good bye
zappaman
(20,606 posts)...yet again?!
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)I hope you're not going to try to equate JFK's meticulous and directly stated separation of his religion from politics, with Mitten's Mormonism in any way, shape, or form? That would be not only fact-free, but highly offensive.
(I'd assume you must've meant Nixon's Quaker religion, except it's so obvious that didn't interfere with his warmongering at all.)
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)everywhere...
Sorry, have a good life, enjoy the hate.
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)I remember the 1960 campaign quite clearly, including the debates. JFK was extremely open, sincere, and believable about his position on his religion... which is exactly the same as the one held by Biden today, as he just stated again in the VP debate. I also remember the Kennedy administration, and he kept to his word and kept religion out of governing -- that is why people became more comfortable electing Catholics to office as it is today. JFK opened that door by keeping his word, as others since then have NOT.
I've seen some cheap shots, but trying to equate JFK and Mittens is reaching way too far to make a point. I'll say it again -- OFFENSIVE!
GoneOffShore
(17,340 posts)Unfortunately very few here are willing to answer the question you asked.
EmeraldCityGrl
(4,310 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Last edited Mon Oct 22, 2012, 05:17 PM - Edit history (1)
And created "secret" oaths that violate the US Constitution. We used to be able to call out a cult and not be called "hateful, war-ing, greedy, ugly or devolved". Especially when this cult has propagated their own separateness themselves.
Frankly, the theology of this particular religion has serious implications for the United States. Until or unless Mitt Rmoney demonstrates that he could or would lead the country independently of his religion, I believe its fair game to scrutinize his Mormon faith.
Fact is, for one example, the Mormon faith believes women are second class citizens. In the video, the women are full veiled - shrouded like their second class citizens in Islam. Their dogma teaches them that women are NOT equal to men. Women cannot hold powerful top church positions. Mitt's history as governor and as CEO of Bain indicates that he not only believes that but its demonstrably proven in his tenure.
Furthermore the Mormon "church's" hateful direct actions to block civil rights for Americans (GLBT) means they deserve scrutiny and critique if valid.
catbyte
(34,412 posts)Callmecrazy
(3,065 posts)Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)but I think there's some validity in pointing out the quirks of a candidate's religious beliefs in the interests of full disclosure. We certainly had no qualms about illuminating santorum's religious beliefs, for example. With Mormonism being such a secretive religion, it would seem to be our duty to expose it. I personally found that video troubling.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)I personally have no objection to letting people learn more about this religion. We know much about Catholicism and Protestantism in this nation, but little about Mormonism. I learned quite a lot from those videos. AND for the first time during an election, I'm not interested in fighting fair. We've done it for too long. Women and minority groups and the elderly and children all have too much to lose this round.
VOX
(22,976 posts)Since the dawn of time, various groups of humans have forced themselves on what they perceive as "others," something less than human, killing them, enslaving them, occupying their lands, making them submit to dogmas, etc. History informs us that taking the higher moral ground could translate to self-destruction of a group.
While I applaud your noble effort to be a small part of the need to break this cycle, I believe that sometimes pushing back is actually the necessary path, even if it means there could be some tragic consequences in achieving the greater good.
Think of what was at stake in the American Civil War, for example. Or the defeat of Nazi Germany. In these and other cases, avoiding conflict would have had dire consequences for this nation and the world at large.
Would you consider the Southern Poverty Law Center's tracking and ID-ing hate groups to constitute an "unevolved" undertaking? As for the Church of LDS, it's important for all Americans to know and comprehend its history, practices and core beliefs. There's no harm in putting the information out there, and allowing for informed decisions.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)be unified with LDS? To show how equality oriented you are, you will defend those who attack equal rights? They are not me. I am evolved. Accepting a hate club is not evolution, it is just accepting a hate club. I will not wish you luck on accepting a hate club. Why? Because what you are actually doing is promoting a hate club, minimizing the actual harm they do to actual people by claiming it is all about those they attack 'accepting' them. Fuck that.
This is not an ashram, this is partisan politics, which is defined by opposing the other Party. To refuse to oppose them is to join them.
trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)The only way we can beat these people is to not do what they do. They point fingers and say hey look at the freaks, they are different , that's why we should hate them. The videos that I've been going around have been doing exactly that, it's saying hey look at the weird ceremonies they have, and look at the weird outfits they wear.
There are much more substantive things we can do to combat the hatred of this religion and others. Pointing out how they look and how weird they are, just doesn't feel right to me, sorry man.
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)There are no rules of civility in this war they started.
I aim to win this war, Fuck being nice to the bastards.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)to be protected from the evil liberals when they go forth to spread intolerance and bigotry....
eShirl
(18,495 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)Not be called out either? Major fail on your part!
trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)That's exactly what they do to us.
I am not at all trying to be self-righteous, This just feels better for me.
Logical
(22,457 posts)trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)But I can give a flying fuck if they like nascar...
Logical
(22,457 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Really??
Mitt Rmoney hasn't denounced ANY of those actions. Nor has he distanced himself from those actions. In fact, he has made absolutely no statements disavowing some pretty disgusting church policy or the church's influence on him if he should become president.
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)And the dressage horse it rode in on. They swear vengeance against this country. They openly state their will to take it over. They believe in forcing others to observe their beliefs (which are nuts). I believe in the separation of church and state, and the right of everyone to live free from the domination of some other self-important chump.
They are very separate and "other" from me, and they are very separate and "other" from my country, and that's THEIR decision which I will not pretend not to see, nor excuse it away. I have nothing in common with that mentality. We in the West have allowed bullyism to flourish and prosper since the 70's, and singing Kumbaya to it is a fool's errand. WW2 proved that to my satisfaction, as well as the political "bipartisanship" which has failed spectacularly for 40 years. The experiment time on that is over -- it's a flop.
Decide what you want, but I'm not with you on that.
trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)I wouldn't disagree with anything you Just said.
But they can be cured by exactly what I'm talking about.
If Mormons weren't to take Out the element of separation themselves, from their religion, it Would remove the hate, which is exactly what you're pointing out.
krawhitham
(4,644 posts)cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)Their stance on lgbt, etc is what needs to be pointed out, not that they wear wacky costumes and have scary bull statutes on their temples
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)Last edited Mon Oct 22, 2012, 06:46 PM - Edit history (1)
braddy
(3,585 posts)quinnox
(20,600 posts)It's getting kind of embarrassing here IMHO. I'm seeing OPs like with the idea that its a bad thing that mormons give 10% of their income to charity, as if this is a terrible moral failing or something, lol. Or trying to make out mormonism as some kind of dangerous David Koresh like cult with secret plans to annihilate America. Meanwhile, in reality, most of the truly dangerous cults have been offshoots of Christianity, like the Branch Davidians. Or the people who end up doing mass killings for crazed religious reasons end up being Christians or other religions, its never the mormons. It has definitely become the silly season.
As someone who has been friends with a mormon for a very long time, I'm just shaking my head and feeling amused at some of this stuff.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)....Do you personally think that's okay, or not?
quinnox
(20,600 posts)He is a very high placed powerful Democrat and a mormon to boot. Maybe he is in on this conspiracy?
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Paul Ryan had the same opportunity at the last VP debate to do the same and he declined. That leads me to believe by Ryan's (non) statements and his actions on abortion, birth control etc. that he does not believe in the separation of church and state.
Rmoney has also not made any statement that the Mormon church will be completely separate from his governance.
Reid has. Here's a recent example on same sex marriage (which the LDS vociferously opposes in theology and practice)
"I Believe That People Should Be Able To Marry Whomever They Want | Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), who personally opposes marriage equality, has responded to President Obamas embrace of same-sex marriage by issuing an extremely supportive statement reiterating that his private beliefs should not prevent people from marrying whomever they want:
My personal belief is that marriage is between a man and a woman. But in a civil society, I believe that people should be able to marry whomever they want, and its no business of mine if two men or two women want to get married. The idea that allowing two loving, committed people to marry would have any impact on my life, or on my familys life, always struck me as absurd.
In talking with my children and grandchildren, it has become clear to me they take marriage equality as a given. I have no doubt that their view will carry the future.
http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2012/05/09/481548/reid-marriage/?mobile=nc
aletier_v
(1,773 posts)" that the Mormon church will be completely separate".
ha ha.
Would it matter if he did?
You can't trust a single word he says.
GoneOffShore
(17,340 posts)And the point that some folks are completely missing in order to not offend Mormons or members of other religions.
I'm seeing a lot of false equivalency and pole vaulting over mouse turds in order to not address the question of the cult of Mormonism and its stance on theocratic rule. There is a lot of denial because, "I know Mormons and they're not like that," and "What if we asked the same questions of Jews?" and "This is being divisive and taking us back to the days of the Know Nothings."
Bull shit.
The whole thing about Mitt and his clan is that they would appear to be true believers in "The White Horse Prophecy" and that LDS'ers are destined by god to take over the US. He has done nothing to deny this in any respect. It should be one of the foremost questions asked by us all.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)It is a shitty idea, but good luck to you anyhow. For the record, the Mormons have made the entire rest of the Earth and earthlings "the other." And they invested millions of dollars into Prop 8. Once they did that, that makes them fair game. End of story. For me, they are total assholes who have it coming for that shit alone.
trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)And they definitely aren't assholes because of the way they dress and because of their ceremonies.
I added a note at the bottom of my op because it seems like a lot of people really weren't understanding where it was coming from. I am no way support the actions of the church, I just don't want us to be in the same category as them pointing fingers at other people saying hey look at the Freaks.
GoneOffShore
(17,340 posts)They really had nothing to do with the weirdness of the ceremony, but rather the intention behind those ceremonies.
trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)The Video is an invasion of privacy. One person pointed out. And I don't see any reason For the videos other than to make Mormons look weird in the eyes of Christians. I think everybody else can give a flying fuck what they do and what they look like, but evangelical Christians will look at this and they will say these people are weird and I don't want to vote for Mitt Romney. That's why I think I was posting these videos in the first place, because somewhere in the back of my mind, I wanted evangelicals to see this, and discriminate against Mormons because the way they look at the way they have their weird ceremonies.
Just trying to take the high road here.
GoneOffShore
(17,340 posts)Unless we thwart them before they get power, we'll never be able to thwart them. "The Handmaid's Tale" could well become reality.
forestpath
(3,102 posts)anti-democratic blight on humanity. I pretty much consider all Christian religions that way, although the Momon religion adds some extra layers of delusion on top of the standard Christian dogma.
I think organized religion is the most destructive force in the world, and I won't apologize for my opinion. I know there are many decent religious people but I will never understand the need so many have to filter their existence through what would be called science fiction or fairy tales if the majority of people were capable of thinking for themselves.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)i agree a million percent.
trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)I had no idea I would get such an intense response? I find it very telling that people are having a hard time distinguishing against peoples looks? And their actions?
The actions of the LDS church is what the problem is, not the video on how they dress and their ceremonies.
We should be pointing out how it's wrong for them to make other people feel like freaks, not pointing fingers at them saying hey look at the freaks?
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)and the real time political implications but now its all back to this again?
Hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)would people be posting and mocking videos of Jewish ceremonies? I don't think so.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)and further, I really doubt the Jews would be called a cult either just because they happen to have a small amount of the total world population in terms of believers, just like the Mormons do.
Floyd_Gondolli
(1,277 posts)But that doesn't mean we shouldn't show their practitioners a basic level of respect. Anyway impressive OP.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)If they have a history of labeling me inferior by reason of race, gender, or sexual orientation, then I believe I have the right to criticize their beliefs. If they have a history of judging me and find me wanting for these reasons, I am entitled to judge them by their actions, their honesty, their treatment of their neighbors to judge them by their character.
When Romney said he favored making undocumented workers so uncomfortable that they'd "self-deport," it was a foreshadowing of how the "other" would be treated in America under a Romney administration sanctioned by the Mormon church whose doctrines he espouses. He is a bishop in the church. He is also a politician. He cannot separate church and state. At least, he doesn't seem inclined to do so.
That is their strategy practiced toward outsiders. Neither buy nor sell to them. Shun them. Make them too uncomfortable to stay. Today, Romney suggests this is how he'd deal with illegal immigration, tomorrow it is how he would deal with the 47%. And that is why I will speak out against Romney and his church's beliefs.