General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPeople really need to learn the difference between "three times more" and "three times as much"!
It's common in advertising to say "x times more" (or greater, faster, stronger, etc.) when what's really meant is "x times as much". Advertisers probably do it on purpose since they know they can get away with it. But here's a case where a Yahoo news writer makes that same mistake, or perhaps quotes someone without asking for clarification:
2 children in Texas were given adult COVID-19 vaccines 3 times stronger than what they should have been given, one of their parents said
Julian Gonzalez, the parent of a six-year-old child who got the Pfizer vaccine, told local news station CBSDFW that the family was at a City of Garland health department pop-up clinic on Sunday so the parents could get their vaccines, when nurses told them that the six-year-old child could also be vaccinated if the parents wanted.
Later in the article:
If a child's dose is 1/3 of an adult dose then the adult dose is three times as strong as the child's dose, or two times stronger. Three times stronger would be four times as strong.
marybourg
(12,633 posts)but who dont know the difference between the subject I and the object me, giving us such everyday monstrosities as Me and him went to the store. And you want them to know the difference between 3 times more and three times as much? LOL
3catwoman3
(24,006 posts)
with a singular pronoun. I have NEVER heard anyone say, Me went to the store, or, Him went to the movies. Never!! And I hope I never do.
I have heard increasing use of I as a possessive, as in, Mary and Is puppy.
marybourg
(12,633 posts)sense that it's I's puppy. Another new usage is the reflexive, "myself", instead if "I" .I blame this on teachers telling students: " Don't start every sentence with 'I'.
ret5hd
(20,493 posts)unblock
(52,251 posts)and also basic things in language and grammar have fallen into the ditch. My particular pet peeve is when people think the words less and fewer are interchangeable. It is very common to hear media people and supposedly college educated people make this mistake. But then again I have come across college graduates, some even in technical fields, who can barely communicate in writing. Spelling even basic words is too much for many of them to accomplish. Old time lawyers must really cringe when they see how awful the grammar, spelling and reasoning is when many of the "new crop" submit case filings. I'm surprised we haven't seen a lawyer submit a query to a judge and ask "RU about 2 rule on my scheduling request BCUZ if not I will keep more time MT?". Ending with an emoji of some sort of course.
unblock
(52,251 posts)Two hates it when noones spells write or uses Gooder English
Chille
(193 posts)Qutzupalotl
(14,316 posts)10% more would be 110%.
100% more would be twice as much, or 200%.
When you say more, youre adding to the initial 100%.
When you say as much, youre multiplying or dividing.
Chille
(193 posts)NH Ethylene
(30,813 posts)Let's say a dosage of something is 5 grams. 10 times as much would be 50 grams.
But 10 times MORE would be 50 grams plus the initial 5 (10 times more than the regular dosage), so 55 grams.
Am I right or am I missing something?
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,855 posts)Less extreme multipliers makes the wording more significant.
To say there's 10% more of a product, like laundry detergent in a bottle for example, is vastly different than saying there's 10% as much.
fishwax
(29,149 posts)occurrences rather than rations, or (b) they don't mind being misunderstood. If you're talking about occurrences (I have eaten bananas four times more than you have) it makes sense, but if you're talking about a ratio it's going to be confusing because it combines the multiplication indicator (times) with an addition indicator (more than). For that reason, I agree with your logic about the basic difference between the two. At the same time, though, "more" is also simply a comparison, which is why it is commonly used interchangeably with "times as much as." You can see the logic start to break down when you reduce it to "one time more than," which nobody would ever use in real life unless they were simply talking about occurrences. You might say "I've been to Europe one time more than you have," but you would never say "this trip to Europe cost one time more than my last one."
I used to edit textbooks (including math books occasionally) for a living, and "times more than" is language that we just never used, for exactly this reason. When it came to percentages, though, more than is fair game (i.e. 100% more than = 200% as much as).
kskiska
(27,045 posts)Also, what really bugs me is "like" and "literally."
"Literally" doesn't seem to even have a meaning anymore, the way people are using it.
Mister Ed
(5,940 posts)It also aggravates me that so many people seem to preface almost every quotation with "like":
So he's like, "That's not proper grammar", and I'm like, "It is too", and he's like, "No, it isn't", and I'm like, "You don't know what you're talking about"...etc. etc. etc.
sanatanadharma
(3,707 posts)When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, 'it means just what I choose it to mean neither more nor less. ' 'The question is,' said Alice, 'whether you can make words mean so many different things. ' 'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master that's all.
Everyone pretends to be on the same page while in truth existing in separate universes.