General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSeriously?!: #Rittenhouse jurors gave the first defense witness Thursday a round of applause.
Link to tweet
Wow!
exboyfil
(17,863 posts)Like something out of the 1950s in the South.
MagickMuffin
(15,943 posts)Ya see no state in this Union is 100% pure. It doesn't matter if you are a southerner or from up north, whackadoddles live everywhere and they are destroying this very Union.
Sympthsical
(9,074 posts)Not an eye witness to the incident.
He's been in the courtroom the entire time.
Yarnie
(90 posts)if the jury may see his testimony in a more favorable light for having served? Whatever. It just doesn't seem appropriate to me.
Sympthsical
(9,074 posts)His expertise is based on his military career, which would have been disclosed pretty much the first time he was on the stand.
CrackityJones75
(2,403 posts)I am sorry if you cannot understand the problem of a judge asking people to applaud someone in a trial . For any reason. It is beyond the pale.
demmiblue
(36,865 posts)3Hotdogs
(12,391 posts)Hoffman has been resurrected and is now presiding on behalf of Rittenhouse.
Little known fact - not verified by Ancestry - Abbie said he was Judge Julius's illegitimate son.
UTUSN
(70,711 posts)Baked Potato
(7,733 posts)calguy
(5,315 posts)Walleye
(31,028 posts)Can any federal charges be brought here? I remember after the Rodney King cops were acquitted, they then were convicted on a federal charge, if Im remembering it right
that was because the Rodney King was African American. All of Rittenhouse's victims were white.
Walleye
(31,028 posts)And apparently he didnt even carry the gun across state lines so there isnt even that. These victims are not going to get justice
dalton99a
(81,516 posts)Good one!
demmiblue
(36,865 posts)Link to tweet
Sympthsical
(9,074 posts)Basically, "Hope lunch isn't late."
demmiblue
(36,865 posts)Walleye
(31,028 posts)dchill
(38,505 posts)MustLoveBeagles
(11,612 posts)a kennedy
(29,673 posts)He ANEEDS TO BE DISCHARGED FROM THE BENCH, now how is that started and finished.
fescuerescue
(4,448 posts)with an impartial juror that can see he's guilty.
leftstreet
(36,109 posts)from what I'm reading
dchill
(38,505 posts)Walleye
(31,028 posts)LiberatedUSA
(1,666 posts)RayTy
(50 posts)the system corrupt beyond fixing.
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)Mandatory patriotism. If they hadn't stood and clapped, there'd be Rightist screams to have them removed from the Jury.
"What, do you hate America? Don't you know the Military is the only thing that keeps us FREE?"
ProfessorGAC
(65,076 posts)It's not honoring. It's fawning worship, far too often.
moondust
(19,993 posts)for anyone but especially the judge to introduce external considerations unrelated to the case which could serve to prejudice the jury. Was that the judge's intent? Did he plan it in advance?