Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lastlib

(23,302 posts)
Fri Nov 12, 2021, 06:40 PM Nov 2021

Merrick Garland Appreciation thread.

Our Attorney General has acted with dispatch and integrity, with respect for democracy and the rule of law, and the principle of equal justice under the law. Many of us were dubious that he would do so, and I think that as a community, we owe him a renewal of respect and appreciation for what he is doing. I for one give him a great big

Thank you, Merrick Garland!! - - - - - - - - -

53 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Merrick Garland Appreciation thread. (Original Post) lastlib Nov 2021 OP
I don't recall seeing where a grand jury had even been empaneled. Thomas Hurt Nov 2021 #1
I understand that grand juries are impaneled for 18 months..... lastlib Nov 2021 #2
It's Supposed to Be Secret DarthDem Nov 2021 #3
He was quiet about the process, wnylib Nov 2021 #24
the way it should be ! monkeyman1 Nov 2021 #32
K&R! Just_Vote_Dem Nov 2021 #4
Guess if AG Garland were looking straight at me on corruption, I'd be spittin out all kinds ... Budi Nov 2021 #5
Count me in. Thank you Mr. Garland. lamp_shade Nov 2021 #6
He proceeded exactly how he should have. Blaukraut Nov 2021 #7
+10,000. wnylib Nov 2021 #26
DOJ is in good hands with Garland dlk Nov 2021 #8
+1 Kaleva Nov 2021 #10
I've read he works quietly and steadily, without commenting to the press dlk Nov 2021 #11
Biden made a great choice IMO. Kaleva Nov 2021 #13
Yes, Biden made an excellent choice dlk Nov 2021 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author dlk Nov 2021 #12
100% Agree! MineralMan Nov 2021 #9
Are there a few here cooking crow for dinner tonight? Bev54 Nov 2021 #14
I'm seeing goalposts being moved mcar Nov 2021 #22
Hahaha yeah if figures, I am sure he was reading DU everyday to get our opinions Bev54 Nov 2021 #23
They'll start complaining about Meadows now mcar Nov 2021 #25
Who imagines themselves to have influenced Garland? Orrex Nov 2021 #49
I think some might actually be disappointed wnylib Nov 2021 #28
There is no doubt they will find their outrage again. Bev54 Nov 2021 #31
You betcha! paleotn Nov 2021 #39
TY lastlib! Cha Nov 2021 #16
good to know something positive happened Demovictory9 Nov 2021 #17
?????? n/t Timewas Nov 2021 #18
Ayyyymen luv2fly Nov 2021 #19
clink! lastlib Nov 2021 #20
Happy to kick this! mcar Nov 2021 #21
Serve it up cold... Blue Owl Nov 2021 #27
K&R MustLoveBeagles Nov 2021 #29
Thank you AG Garland. wnylib Nov 2021 #30
And a lump of coal to all the haters! live love laugh Nov 2021 #33
Whodat?!! Some BADASS?? ancianita Nov 2021 #34
Love this. Joinfortmill Nov 2021 #37
Let's not start the praise train yet. Marius25 Nov 2021 #35
Oh, once the rule of law rulings start, trust your nation, the real consequences begin. ancianita Nov 2021 #43
Good news. Joinfortmill Nov 2021 #36
If I said it once, I'll say it a thousand times - from the day the House cited Bannon for contempt.. George II Nov 2021 #38
Kicking your post & Cha Nov 2021 #47
Remember today when things don't appear to be moving as quickly as we would like. TomSlick Nov 2021 #40
Tip of the hat HootieMcBoob Nov 2021 #41
Thank you Merrick Garland FakeNoose Nov 2021 #42
I'm right there with you..... Upthevibe Nov 2021 #44
Faith restored! A great day!! nt RussBLib Nov 2021 #45
no leaks... Trueblue Texan Nov 2021 #46
Amen bluescribbler Nov 2021 #48
Thank you MustLoveBeagles Nov 2021 #50
Add my thanks and appreciation - nicely done, Sir! Talitha Nov 2021 #51
I'm sorry Stargleamer Nov 2021 #52
Garland didn't wait months--the charge was made in 17 days. lastlib Nov 2021 #53

Thomas Hurt

(13,903 posts)
1. I don't recall seeing where a grand jury had even been empaneled.
Fri Nov 12, 2021, 06:42 PM
Nov 2021

Not sure if I missed it or Garland was very quiet and sneaky about it.

lastlib

(23,302 posts)
2. I understand that grand juries are impaneled for 18 months.....
Fri Nov 12, 2021, 06:44 PM
Nov 2021

...and hear multiple cases during their term. Seems likely one was already impaneled, and the Bannon case was already queued.

DarthDem

(5,256 posts)
3. It's Supposed to Be Secret
Fri Nov 12, 2021, 06:47 PM
Nov 2021

You sometimes see announcements of grand juries being empaneled, but that typically occurs with state matters more often than with federal matters. Federal grand jury matters are supposed to be conducted in secret.

wnylib

(21,614 posts)
24. He was quiet about the process,
Fri Nov 12, 2021, 08:00 PM
Nov 2021

as a good AG should be. Indictments come from grand juries, not from the media or from armchair attorneys.

 

Budi

(15,325 posts)
5. Guess if AG Garland were looking straight at me on corruption, I'd be spittin out all kinds ...
Fri Nov 12, 2021, 06:51 PM
Nov 2021

....all kinds of Social Media memes to discredit him, too!
Had I done the dirty shit Trump & his team did, all the years he did it, and knowing AG Garland's success with the Biggest criminal convictions as he has done, I'd be fking jonesing into madness, while AG Garland just remains silent, never offering a single hint of who, what, where nor when.

Pure paranoia has a way of making criminals crazy, & AG Garland's silence is not an error, but intentional.

Blaukraut

(5,695 posts)
7. He proceeded exactly how he should have.
Fri Nov 12, 2021, 07:07 PM
Nov 2021

I follow Teri Kanefield on Twitter. She has been on point explaining how, in order to save democracy, our side cannot act in undemocratic ways, no matter how much we would like to. When both sides give up on democracy, it is truly dead. So of course we wanted Bannon dragged off to jail immediately, but that's not how our justice system works. Nor should it work that way.

dlk

(11,578 posts)
11. I've read he works quietly and steadily, without commenting to the press
Fri Nov 12, 2021, 07:17 PM
Nov 2021

I think he’s the right man for this difficult time.

Response to Kaleva (Reply #10)

mcar

(42,376 posts)
22. I'm seeing goalposts being moved
Fri Nov 12, 2021, 07:46 PM
Nov 2021

and pats on the back for "pressuring" Garland to do this.

Like the Attorney General acted because some random people on social media whined about him.

Bev54

(10,072 posts)
23. Hahaha yeah if figures, I am sure he was reading DU everyday to get our opinions
Fri Nov 12, 2021, 07:57 PM
Nov 2021

I am seeing the same thing on other sites, people saying we got a win when yesterday the outrage was Fire Garland. I hope all the outrage rhetoric can at least be tapped down now.

Orrex

(63,225 posts)
49. Who imagines themselves to have influenced Garland?
Sat Nov 13, 2021, 06:23 PM
Nov 2021

No one I’ve seen on DU, nor anyone I’ve found anywhere on social media. I’d be interested to see who is making those claims.

wnylib

(21,614 posts)
28. I think some might actually be disappointed
Fri Nov 12, 2021, 08:08 PM
Nov 2021

that the indictment removes their reason for outraged pessimism. But I'm sure they'll find something else.

 

Marius25

(3,213 posts)
35. Let's not start the praise train yet.
Fri Nov 12, 2021, 09:01 PM
Nov 2021

Bannon maybe able to drag this out for awhile. If Trump wins in 2024, Bannon is getting another pardon, Garland still hasn't gone after Trump or the Trump family, and the Insurrectionists are still getting slaps on the wrist.

I'm glad to see something was finally done, but I'm reserving judgement until more real consequences happen.

ancianita

(36,137 posts)
43. Oh, once the rule of law rulings start, trust your nation, the real consequences begin.
Fri Nov 12, 2021, 09:36 PM
Nov 2021

Been there. Seen that. So has Merrick Badass Garland.

The U.S. Badass Constitution seems weak to bullies, but kicks their ass once The Idea Of Democracy is enforced.

George II

(67,782 posts)
38. If I said it once, I'll say it a thousand times - from the day the House cited Bannon for contempt..
Fri Nov 12, 2021, 09:08 PM
Nov 2021

....until today was only SEVENTEEN DAYS! That's the speed of light in legal proceedings.

The Grand Jury meets twice a month. Today was probably the first chance they had since October 26 to hand down an indictment.

Today was the day! They did it.

Thank you Attorney General Garland.

TomSlick

(11,109 posts)
40. Remember today when things don't appear to be moving as quickly as we would like.
Fri Nov 12, 2021, 09:12 PM
Nov 2021

Real justice never moves as quickly as it does on TV cop shows.

We need to assume there will be motions to dismiss based on bogus claims of executive privilege that will have to be worked through. After that, the federal court cannot be expected to clear its docket to move this trial to the front of the line. (There are a few hundred insurrectionists' cases to be resolved.) The wheels of justice will grind slowly but they will grind fine. In the meanwhile Bannon will be running up attorney's fees with lawyers who will expect to be paid.

It's a good day for Democracy.

HootieMcBoob

(3,823 posts)
41. Tip of the hat
Fri Nov 12, 2021, 09:14 PM
Nov 2021

I had serious doubts. Let’s hope there’s more to come. Well done. Now let’s get him a lengthy stay behind bars.

Talitha

(6,618 posts)
51. Add my thanks and appreciation - nicely done, Sir!
Sat Nov 13, 2021, 06:33 PM
Nov 2021

BTW, here's a pretty good article
regarding the Bannon situation.

Read it slowly - read all of it.

I learned a lot!

Stargleamer

(1,990 posts)
52. I'm sorry
Sun Nov 14, 2021, 04:37 PM
Nov 2021

I don't appreciate him waiting around for months knowing that the Republicans would seek to run out the clock, which they are doing. Trump will never face any consequences with people like this; he's made a career out of running out the clock. Garland knew this and still let it happen.

As Don Winslow says, "I miss consequences".

lastlib

(23,302 posts)
53. Garland didn't wait months--the charge was made in 17 days.
Mon Nov 15, 2021, 12:48 AM
Nov 2021

That's greased lightning compared to the usual glacial pace of federal prosecution decisions. To have moved so rapidly to indict, DOJ had to put together a prima facie case for conviction with blinding speed; clearly, they knew time was of the essence. Bannon can still play delay and drag it out for a long time with appeals and other tactics, but DOJ is pretty certain it has the goods.

Will things get back to TFG eventually? Who knows? But that may ultimately not be something Garland gets to decide.

If we can't be optimistic, perhaps we should at least reserve judgment until things play out further.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Merrick Garland Appreciat...