Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI thought this was supposed to be a FOREIGN POLICY debate
Kinda important to STICK TO THE TOPIC.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 645 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I thought this was supposed to be a FOREIGN POLICY debate (Original Post)
WilliamPitt
Oct 2012
OP
MountainMazza
(312 posts)1. Mitt is groping....for talking points
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)2. Not if one of the debaters is essentially illiterate in FP
ElboRuum
(4,717 posts)3. Not to Mittens...
Of course, this is the moderator's responsibility to keep things going on track. He's not doing shit to keep this on-topic right now.
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)4. Romney's trying to run out the clock talking domestic issues,
Scheiffer and Obama are letting him do it.
hatrack
(59,592 posts)5. Maybe it got lost behind the climate policy briefing books . . .
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)6. Olympics? I want Mitt to talk about Rafalca and the Olympics
I want to hear more.