Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,212 posts)
Tue Nov 16, 2021, 09:22 PM Nov 2021

Judge blocks tax cut rule in American Rescue Plan

MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — A federal judge has blocked the U.S. Treasury from enforcing a provision of the American Rescue Plan Act that prohibited states from using the pandemic relief funds to offset new tax cuts.

U.S. District Judge L. Scott Coogler ruled Monday in Alabama that Congress exceeded its power in putting the so-called tax mandate on states. He entered a final judgement in favor of 13 states that had filed a lawsuit and instructed the Treasury Department not to enforce the provision. The judge left the rest of the law in place.

The American Rescue Plan steered $195 billion in flexible relief funds to states but specified that states could not use it as a means to cut taxes by using the federal relief dollars to offset the revenue reduction.

The judge described the tax-cut restrictions as “a federal invasion of State sovereignty" that was “unconstitutionally ambiguous" — leaving states guessing as to whether their tax cuts would trigger a repayment of federal funds.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/judge-blocks-tax-cut-rule-in-american-rescue-plan/ar-AAQMs7y

Federal money has nearly always had strings attached.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge blocks tax cut rule in American Rescue Plan (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2021 OP
And that money will now go in the pockets of the rich, and their pet projects. Disgusting PortTack Nov 2021 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Nov 2021 #4
No doubt this will be appealed, Feds can attach strings to their funding and if the states Bev54 Nov 2021 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Nov 2021 #3
Gosh I sure hope so! PortTack Nov 2021 #6
Give the money back then. Freethinker65 Nov 2021 #5

Response to PortTack (Reply #1)

Bev54

(10,072 posts)
2. No doubt this will be appealed, Feds can attach strings to their funding and if the states
Tue Nov 16, 2021, 09:45 PM
Nov 2021

don't like it, then don't take the money. They should do like PM Trudeau in Canada did years ago when he agreed to more health funds for the provinces but the $ had to go towards mental health and drug rehabilitation, not to administration or other places. The provinces tried to get together and say no but Trudeau negotiated with each province separately and eventually they all agreed.

Response to Bev54 (Reply #2)

Freethinker65

(10,055 posts)
5. Give the money back then.
Tue Nov 16, 2021, 10:17 PM
Nov 2021

No way in hell does it go into a State's general slush fund. Blue states are tired of subsidizing red states but agreed to the plan because it was to help with costs related to the pandemic. Democrats did not want individuals in any state to suffer needlessly.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge blocks tax cut rule...