Is Trump guilty of infanticide?

[Cyrano]

Infanticide is the killing of a human being within a year after it's birth.

"Christian" fundamentalists are against aborting a fetus, but they evidently have no problem with the orange monster murdering infants at the US/Mexican border. When Trump ordered that children be torn from the arms of their families in order to "protect our border," did anyone ever ask how many infants were torn from their mothers/fathers? I don't know. Do you? But does anyone believe that it didn't happen?

An infant, torn from proper care, will die. Does anyone think that didn't happen during Trump's reign of terror? Does anyone actually believe that didn't take place during the kidnappings/crimes that took place at our southern border? (No, I can't name a specific family or infant. But the Trump induced horror at our border with Mexico has enough known horror stories to let us know that infants must have numbered among his victims.)

We're currently investigating January 6th, 2021 and that's a good thing. But what would be even better is if we investigated the countless crimes committed by this dangerous ignorant, uncaring, evil man. (We already know about the hundreds of thousands that he murdered due to his non-mask, non-vaccination for Covid-19 campaign that continues until today.)

Pre-Trump, even the unprincipled, corrupt Republican Party would not have gone this far, -- wouldn't have been this insane.

Before the next election rolls around, ask yourself, how many human beings are dead because of this horrible creature who is attempting a comeback. And how many of them were infants? -- And also, how many more he will murder if he is again put in power.

[onecaliberal]

1. MORE THAN 700,000. No big deal. Ask the media.

They’ve forgotten all about it. They’re too busy hating Biden for helping working Americans instead of their corporate masters.

[Cyrano]

2. Seems that bringing monsters to justice is

no longer a priority among "civilized" people.

[onecaliberal]

3. Wealthy people ARE clearly above the law.

They can commit heinous crimes, literally rape and pillage. The law can’t be bothered to charge them with doing the very same thing poor people or people with no access to legal assistance are rotting in prison for.

[Captain Zero]

4. who knows? But I'm not sure about the pee tapes because,

I think Putin has him in a snuff video, and it wasn't on 5th Avenue, so it will count if it ever gets out.

[Tribetime]

5. Im lost ?

[TreasonousBastard]

6. Such has it always been-- the Johnstown Flood caused a national grieving period...

books sold, a monument commissioned, and not one of the owners paid a nickel or spent an hour in the slam thanks to legal barriers set up to insulate the shipping, steel, and railroad barons from their greed.

Curiously, not minding the horror of Johnstown in 1899, in 1936 and 1967, the area flooded again.

Even more curiously, in 1911 there was the Bayless Dam break abut a hundred miles away because Bayless, the lumber mill owner, was too cheap to build a proper dam.

We have such short memories when money is involved. It's not just the Orange Orang-utang. It is all of us who wear the shame.

[MiniMe]

7. I believe the last flood was in 1977

My family is from Johnstown, and I remember that one. 1894, 1907, 1924, 1936 , and 1977