General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat's the difference
Between having a monarch and being ruled by the Federalist Society?
An enquiring migrant Antipodean would love to know.
LeftInTX
(25,354 posts)I also don't know if you're asking between monarch OR the federalist society.
I guess it depends on the monarch....
UK isn't bad because it isn't really a monarchy. Looks like parliament runs the show over there.
I'm sure there are a few really bad monarchies left in the world, but I just can't think of any.
I would think a parliament would be better, but then I look at Israel and they're pretty messed up.
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)Tanuki
(14,918 posts)keithbvadu2
(36,814 posts)noun
noun: Antipodean; plural noun: Antipodeans
a person from Australia or New Zealand (used by inhabitants of the northern hemisphere).
"a brisk Antipodean, she moved with speed and efficiency"
Out of several billion inhabitants of the northern hemisphere, you're the only one I've ever heard using it.
panader0
(25,816 posts)keithbvadu2
(36,814 posts)malaise
(269,020 posts)A plutocracy by any other name is still a plutocracy. That said the Federalist Society does not appear to be against a kakistocracy
captain queeg
(10,201 posts)However, katisocracy is a pretty good word, certainly in our present situation. See, I already forgot the definition but in essence its the rule by the least competent. Im sticking with easy words till I fully wake, have some coffee, or just go back to bed. The joys of being retired; I could decide to do any of those.
GoCubsGo
(32,084 posts)Many in the country ruled by The Federalist Society think they still live in a democracy, and are oblivious to who are their real rulers.