School shooters gun.

[Cattledog]

"The gun, a 9mm pistol with 15-round magazines, was purchased by the suspect’s father last week, four days before the shooting, said Oakland County Sheriff Michael Bouchard."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/11/30/oxford-michigan-school-shooting/

[raccoon]

1. Thanks, dad. :sarcasm: Nt

[Bernardo de La Paz]

10. Hey, Tough Tony, here at DU we like to get our facts right & outlandish claims require hard evidence

If you are going to state something that is well-known, fine.

But if you are going to make a big extreme claim, you better buttress it with links and facts. You didn't speculate, you made big claims about the cases.




I think your claim that the father sent the son is bogus.
I think you will never be able to support that with evidence.
But you better do so now or self-delete.

I think your claim that Rittenhouse's mother sent him on a "terrorist mission" is bogus.
I think you will never be able to support that with evidence.
Not "oh she took him to a bar with Proud Boys", not something that makes some vague connection.

Your claims are very bold and strong.
Your evidence better be very bold and strong.

[Kaleva]

3. Hopefully the parents will be sued into oblivion.

[llmart]

7. Sued???

The father needs to be in prison.

[Kaleva]

13. For violating what law?

[ck4829]

14. His inaction led to the deaths of 3 innocent people

Both the father and son here are horrible monsters.

[Kaleva]

16. which isn't a crime in MI

he could be sued in civil court though.

[ck4829]

17. He's still a horrible monster

And every bit of social backlash he gets will be well-deserved.

[Kaleva]

20. I agree.

[llmart]

18. +1000

Yep. Couldn't agree more. Accessory to murder.

[bucolic_frolic]

4. No wonder they found a lawyer so fast

[bucolic_frolic]

5. I read that the parents were allowed to meet with the gunman and advised him not to speak

That seems an error to me. Why would authorities allow such a meeting before they learned all they could? Surely no law requires such a meeting?

[Lochloosa]

6. Underage. They had a right to talk to their son.

[bucolic_frolic]

8. Yes, that makes sense, they gotta follow the law

but did they have to allow the parents to talk to him first? considering the severity of the circumstances and public safety ...

[SYFROYH]

11. I would want it to be law to have every minor talk to parents before questioning

If a suspect in a crime.

[Lochloosa]

12. So you want cops to talk to a suspect without the option of asking for a lawyer?

Remember back how nervous a cop made you at 15.

[sir pball]

15. "They gotta follow the law...but did they really have to follow the law?!"

Seriously, WTF?

[PTWB]

19. Yes, in many (most?) states, children are not allowed to be interrogated without parental knowledge

and parental consent. Some states have greater protections than others but this is quite standard.

You weren’t under the impression that the police can just arrest children and interrogate them without the parental knowledge, consent and, at times, presence, were you?

[WhiskeyGrinder]

9. He's a kid.