General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow we got here. What is at stake today in the SCOTUS
All of the advances that women have made in the last 50 years actually will go away if the Right Wing gets what they want out of this court.
How, you ask? Because anti-choice is, at first and last, anti-woman, and that means all our choices are in the mix. Contraception, birth control, welfare assistance, childcare, parental leave, jobs and career advancement all of it.
Theyve been laying the social groundwork forever by redefining the most popular and effective contraceptives as abortifacients. Theyve been lying to teenagers for decades, saying condoms are completely ineffective against both disease and pregnancy.
Theyve laid legal groundwork by making sure that the US Congress inserted conscience clauses into every piece of health legislation so that employers/insurers, hospitals, doctors and pharmacists all have a legal out for not only refusing to provide for abortions but for refusing to cover/provide Plan B, Morning After, contraceptive pills and contraceptive devices. The Hyde Amendment was introduced as a compromise, and somehow it has never gone away.
Legal groundwork at the state level has included personhood laws, and when that was too direct they did an end-run by defining the murder of a pregnant woman as a double-homicide. Theyve intruded on the health crisis that is addiction, not by providing support to beat the addiction but by imprisoning pregnant women for endangering their fetuses. Theyve worked to broaden the definition of what endangers a fetus where there is a miscarriage, there must be a woman at fault.
Are you beginning to get the picture now?
It goes further. When Roe vs Wade was decided, it superseded state laws but state legislatures saw no need to actually remove those old laws from the books. It may have been lazy thinking at the time, but at some point someone realized that if Roe goes away, the old laws come back automatically unless they have since been overturned by the state and by that time the culture wars were in full swing.
They have been relentless, in part because Gawd is on their side and in part because women are just too uppity for their own good, but hey, same thing in the end. When one legislative maneuver fails, they try another in a different state, then return and try again.
Thats all I can say for now. Theres so much more.
I was in college when Roe became law. I was glad, and at the same time conflicted. At some point I came to understand that the anti-abortion hysteria was not all about nasty entitled women aborting fully-formed adorable Gerber babies (as the RW likes to portray the situation, thus trying to make every one of us ashamed to speak out in support of abortion), but it was truly about contraception and the ability to prevent pregnancy in the first place. And contraception is foundational to absolutely every advance we women have made in the last century. Thats where we are going.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,627 posts)...from the rooftops.
"Never again, another season of silence."
Hekate
(90,714 posts)LiberalLoner
(9,762 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)the conservatives are far-right religious and religious extremist in orientation.
Clarence Thomas, now one of the most powerful people in the country, is believed by many to be a lifelong black nationalist with lifelong enmity toward the system of government that opened the way for him to from black rural poverty to the high court -- and belief that it should be destroyed and black Americans establish their own separate governance. Thanks to the 3 justices appointed with the religious far right's approval by tRump, he's in position that he could once never have imagined to work on the destruction part anyway.
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
in2herbs
(2,945 posts)Sotamayer, during a back and forth with the anti-abortion attorney, said that the Constitution does not declare the USSC to be the final arbiter. (paraphrasing) Extrapolating that thought, in the event the USSC messes with Roe, in reliance in principal of Sotamayer's statement, why couldn't blue states pass abortion protection laws even if they appear to violate today's decision (whenever that will be.) Further, why couldn't voting laws be expanded in blue states, even though they appear to violate the current USSC voting rights decision.
Probably pie in the sky thinking but Ds are going to have to do something to retain and motivate D voters. Biden is doing his best but is it enough? Polls don't think so. The courts are our problem.
Solly Mack
(90,769 posts)Good post.
Hekate
(90,714 posts)
in American history were passed and then overturned. This SCOTUS gutted the Voting Rights Act and now is about to gut Roe vs Wade.
I feel kind of gutted myself.
LiberalLoner
(9,762 posts)Poem by Tyler Knott Greyson
Now I Lay Me Down to Sleep
Be gentle,
Always delicate
With every soul you meet,
For every single morning
You wake up,
There is someone
Wishing,
Silently,
And secretly,
That they
Had not.
TygrBright
(20,760 posts)niyad
(113,329 posts)Hekate
(90,714 posts)It feels odd, because whenever I post something at DU it is already edited and proofread extensively before I hit Send. Nonetheless, the LAT has strict limits on length.