Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hekate

(90,714 posts)
Wed Dec 1, 2021, 05:25 PM Dec 2021

How we got here. What is at stake today in the SCOTUS

All of the advances that women have made in the last 50 years actually will go away if the Right Wing gets what they want out of this court.

How, you ask? Because anti-choice is, at first and last, anti-woman, and that means all our choices are in the mix. Contraception, birth control, welfare assistance, childcare, parental leave, jobs and career advancement — all of it.

They’ve been laying the social groundwork forever by redefining the most popular and effective contraceptives as abortifacients. They’ve been lying to teenagers for decades, saying condoms are completely ineffective against both disease and pregnancy.

They’ve laid legal groundwork by making sure that the US Congress inserted “conscience clauses” into every piece of health legislation — so that employers/insurers, hospitals, doctors and pharmacists all have a legal out for not only refusing to provide for abortions but for refusing to cover/provide Plan B, Morning After, contraceptive pills and contraceptive devices. The Hyde Amendment was introduced as a compromise, and somehow it has never gone away.

Legal groundwork at the state level has included “personhood” laws, and when that was too direct they did an end-run by defining the murder of a pregnant woman as a double-homicide. They’ve intruded on the health crisis that is addiction, not by providing support to beat the addiction but by imprisoning pregnant women for endangering their fetuses. They’ve worked to broaden the definition of what endangers a fetus — where there is a miscarriage, there must be a woman at fault.

Are you beginning to get the picture now?

It goes further. When Roe vs Wade was decided, it superseded state laws — but state legislatures saw no need to actually remove those old laws from the books. It may have been lazy thinking at the time, but at some point someone realized that if Roe goes away, the old laws come back automatically unless they have since been overturned by the state — and by that time the culture wars were in full swing.

They have been relentless, in part because Gawd is on their side and in part because women are just too uppity for their own good, but hey, same thing in the end. When one legislative maneuver fails, they try another in a different state, then return and try again.

That’s all I can say for now. There’s so much more.

I was in college when Roe became law. I was glad, and at the same time conflicted. At some point I came to understand that the anti-abortion hysteria was not all about nasty entitled women aborting fully-formed adorable Gerber babies (as the RW likes to portray the situation, thus trying to make every one of us ashamed to speak out in support of abortion), but it was truly about contraception and the ability to prevent pregnancy in the first place. And contraception is foundational to absolutely every advance we women have made in the last century. That’s where we are going.








12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,627 posts)
1. Thank you for your very clear post about where we are going. It needs to be shouted ...
Wed Dec 1, 2021, 05:39 PM
Dec 2021

...from the rooftops.

"Never again, another season of silence."

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
3. Compared to the American public and all previous courts,
Wed Dec 1, 2021, 06:00 PM
Dec 2021

the conservatives are far-right religious and religious extremist in orientation.

Clarence Thomas, now one of the most powerful people in the country, is believed by many to be a lifelong black nationalist with lifelong enmity toward the system of government that opened the way for him to from black rural poverty to the high court -- and belief that it should be destroyed and black Americans establish their own separate governance. Thanks to the 3 justices appointed with the religious far right's approval by tRump, he's in position that he could once never have imagined to work on the destruction part anyway.




in2herbs

(2,945 posts)
5. Unfortunately, I was unable to listen to the argument, however, I did see one post where
Wed Dec 1, 2021, 07:03 PM
Dec 2021

Sotamayer, during a back and forth with the anti-abortion attorney, said that the Constitution does not declare the USSC to be the final arbiter. (paraphrasing) Extrapolating that thought, in the event the USSC messes with Roe, in reliance in principal of Sotamayer's statement, why couldn't blue states pass abortion protection laws even if they appear to violate today's decision (whenever that will be.) Further, why couldn't voting laws be expanded in blue states, even though they appear to violate the current USSC voting rights decision.

Probably pie in the sky thinking but Ds are going to have to do something to retain and motivate D voters. Biden is doing his best but is it enough? Polls don't think so. The courts are our problem.

Hekate

(90,714 posts)
8. I am beyond stunned that in my own lifetime 2 of the greatest civil rights advancements ...
Wed Dec 1, 2021, 10:43 PM
Dec 2021

… in American history were passed and then overturned. This SCOTUS gutted the Voting Rights Act and now is about to gut Roe vs Wade.

I feel kind of gutted myself.

LiberalLoner

(9,762 posts)
7. Just feeling the need to post this, here. For all of us, maybe.
Wed Dec 1, 2021, 08:22 PM
Dec 2021

Poem by Tyler Knott Greyson

Now I Lay Me Down to Sleep

Be gentle,
Always delicate
With every soul you meet,

For every single morning
You wake up,
There is someone
Wishing,
Silently,
And secretly,
That they
Had not.

Hekate

(90,714 posts)
12. Decided to send this off to the LA Times, but I'll have to cut it significantly first...
Thu Dec 2, 2021, 04:02 PM
Dec 2021

It feels odd, because whenever I post something at DU it is already edited and proofread extensively before I hit Send. Nonetheless, the LAT has strict limits on length.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How we got here. What is ...