General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe New Right's Strange and Dangerous Cult of Toughness
An emerging culture idolizes a twisted version of toughness as the highest ideal and despises a false version of weakness as the lowest vice.https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/12/the-new-rights-strange-and-dangerous-cult-of-toughness/620861/
Last month, at the National Conservatism conference, a gathering of hundreds of leaders and members of a movement that hopes to represent a new, less libertarian American right, one of the speakers, a lawyer named Josh Hammer, delivered a strange denunciation of fusionism. For those not steeped in the language of conservatism, fusionism refers to the alliance among economic conservatives, social conservatives, and defense hawks forged during the Reagan administration. It was designed to confront government overreach at home and the threat of Soviet tyranny abroad.
Fusionism, Hammer said, is inherently effete, limp, and, as Hillsdale Colleges David Azerrad might say, unmasculine. It makes for a cowardly way to approach politics in part because it ensures never having to face pushback from ones political opponents on the most contested issues.
Longtime fusionists, who are veterans not just of the intense and consequential debates surrounding foreign policy during the Cold War and the War on Terror but also of countless successful courtroom contests designed to expand First Amendment rights in the face of government censorship, might be startled by this news.
But thats hardly the oddest part of Hammers critique. Fusionism is unmasculine? How is that claim a part of an allegedly serious ideological argument? The critique, however, helps illuminate the emerging culture of the righta culture that idolizes a twisted version of toughness as the highest ideal and despises a false version of weakness as the lowest vice.
snip
Walleye
(31,025 posts)DBoon
(22,366 posts)Per Umberto Ecco:
12. Since both permanent war and heroism are difficult games to play, the Ur-Fascist
transfers his will to power to sexual matters. This is the origin of machismo (which
implies both disdain for women and intolerance and condemnation of nonstandard sexual
habits, from chastity to homosexuality). Since even sex is a difficult game to play, the Ur-
Fascist hero tends to play with weapons doing so becomes an ersatz phallic exercise.
https://www.pegc.us/archive/Articles/eco_ur-fascism.pdf
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,348 posts)Celerity
(43,383 posts)If not (as this is the first time I have heard this) I can cut n' paste the text via an edit.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,348 posts)And adaptive browsers can't read screenshots at all.
Celerity
(43,383 posts)RAB910
(3,501 posts)Every conservative idea is pushed by appealing to fear (with hate and self centeredness mixed in from time to time)
crickets
(25,980 posts)Volaris
(10,271 posts)They're pissed cause they cant say n****r in public anymore without getting yelled at. It's as simple as that, and every other argument they create is sophist, excuse-making, tantrums to cover up the fact that they're all 40yo children who understand neither how their own dicks work, OR 'personal responsibility'.
Sympthsical
(9,073 posts)And it's a term they largely reserve for other Republicans and figures in the conservative movement who are perceived to be too socially liberal or felt that they do not push back enough against Democrats and the Left.
For example, if you google conservative anti-Trump writers and the word "cuck" you will find many, many results.
Republicans who mainly reside in D.C. or New York (any major media center, really), and who socialize primarily with other media figures and politicians are seen as part of an effete, soft, unmasculine class of people - i.e. the elites. The never-Trumpers are soft men to be despised and ridiculed with all the disgust one can muster.
So cuck cuckity cuck cuck cuck, all day long in the right-wing blogosphere.