Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AngryOldDem

(14,061 posts)
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 03:46 PM Dec 2021

My thought about the Crumbleys.

Last edited Sat Dec 4, 2021, 06:33 PM - Edit history (2)

And maybe it’s been shared by others here somewhere.

Ethan did not do this on his own. This was not the usual “sick kid steals a gun from dad and goes out to kill”. I believe the parents weaponized him — basically the same as if they had strapped a bomb to his body and sent him in to that school. I hope the investigation delves deep into their pasts and their past and current associations because I think there is much more to this tragedy.

As far as I know, a terrorism charge is not on Mr. and Mrs. Crumbley’s rap sheet. I think it should be.


EDIT: Fixed the spelling of these monsters’ names.

70 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
My thought about the Crumbleys. (Original Post) AngryOldDem Dec 2021 OP
Post removed Post removed Dec 2021 #1
You're not serious. maxsolomon Dec 2021 #8
Yes. BlackSkimmer Dec 2021 #28
+1 H2O Man Dec 2021 #37
Ditto ... +2 KPN Dec 2021 #47
Nonsense. . . .nt Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2021 #9
That's a stretch PJMcK Dec 2021 #11
Don't think that Rebl2 Dec 2021 #23
I'm just thinking when does gross negligence become intentional Walleye Dec 2021 #44
Not in this case. KPN Dec 2021 #49
Well I really do not understand the gun loving mentality of course I doubt it now but at the time Walleye Dec 2021 #54
No. ShazzieB Dec 2021 #24
True that is the much more likely scenario. But after seeing that drawing I don't know Walleye Dec 2021 #42
His mother's text DENVERPOPS Dec 2021 #27
Of course the school's at fault! Bourgeois Liberal Dec 2021 #43
Welcome to DU panader0 Dec 2021 #63
The school official who allowed him to stay at school should be fired. 58Sunliner Dec 2021 #69
I agree. They are escape artists in that way. taxi Dec 2021 #56
Not a doubt in your mind? NH Ethylene Dec 2021 #40
Well I don't necessarily mean they wanted kids killed they just wanted him to shoot Walleye Dec 2021 #41
Highly unlikely. Straw Man Dec 2021 #60
I wouldn't be surprised if they thought their kid would be viewed as a hero like Rittenhouse, jalan48 Dec 2021 #2
Their actions since have been truly mindboggling. AngryOldDem Dec 2021 #3
There seems to be plenty explanations for ForgedCrank Dec 2021 #61
Yeah, they've got something to hide, and now it's going to come out. Progressive Jones Dec 2021 #68
Then they can meet the Orange God lame54 Dec 2021 #5
My fear also. fierywoman Dec 2021 #6
Nonsense. Get real. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2021 #10
They don't seem like the kind of people who do much planning ahead Bucky Dec 2021 #26
Hard to say what their actual intent was, if there even was one, Ocelot II Dec 2021 #4
+1. The problem was long festering, didn't happen in two weeks after Rittenhouse. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2021 #12
Homicidal thoughts in teens is not that infrequent. maxsolomon Dec 2021 #13
Good observations. They may also just have been in full denial KPN Dec 2021 #52
It does seem like given the circumstances somebody was bound to get shot eventually Walleye Dec 2021 #55
This is my take too. joshcryer Dec 2021 #67
I think the prosecutor is going to pursue a terrorism charge. hamsterjill Dec 2021 #7
Agree with you, 100% (nt) Paladin Dec 2021 #14
At a minimum they realize that once all the facts are known, relatives give depositions etc Hugh_Lebowski Dec 2021 #15
True. AngryOldDem Dec 2021 #18
I've been thinking the same. yardwork Dec 2021 #16
Dammit! Now I have to add "Crumley" to my dead word list. Iggo Dec 2021 #17
Add Crumbley... El Supremo Dec 2021 #21
Already there. Iggo Dec 2021 #35
But that's not how it's spelled. BlackSkimmer Dec 2021 #29
I think you missed the point. Iggo Dec 2021 #34
Ah, gotcha. All apologies. BlackSkimmer Dec 2021 #62
This message was self-deleted by its author BlackSkimmer Dec 2021 #30
I suspect that Ethan was abused vlyons Dec 2021 #19
I hear you. ShazzieB Dec 2021 #25
Well, obviously planning to run out on their kid... AngryOldDem Dec 2021 #38
Fucked up family dalton99a Dec 2021 #20
Depraved indifference to both the child and the school. Don't know if it meets the legal threshold. 58Sunliner Dec 2021 #22
I agree. Looking forward to hearing a number of bad parenting gems to come out. Bucky Dec 2021 #31
If you are correct, that may be grounds to move the murder charge to juvenile court. JustABozoOnThisBus Dec 2021 #32
Michigan Law DownriverDem Dec 2021 #33
They may not have wanted it to specifically go down like this... paleotn Dec 2021 #36
Oh, I think it's beyond that relayerbob Dec 2021 #39
As for the parents' intent/culpability, why a pistol? 70sEraVet Dec 2021 #45
It was a semi-automatic. AngryOldDem Dec 2021 #46
They cannot according to the news legal expert arlyellowdog Dec 2021 #50
Yes, and why didn't they wait until Christmas to give it to him if it truly was a gift? llmart Dec 2021 #51
There is a range of reasons here ForgedCrank Dec 2021 #53
Exactly right. I think it's fair to say that there was probably some kind of family dysfunction Ocelot II Dec 2021 #57
I agree about the 'charging the kid as an adult'. 70sEraVet Dec 2021 #58
I find this manner of thinking to ForgedCrank Dec 2021 #48
The mom texted him: "Don't do it." Patterson Dec 2021 #59
Maybe they were hoping the kid would kill himself ThoughtCriminal Dec 2021 #64
I had a similar line of thought this morning... Sogo Dec 2021 #65
I'd have to see some evidence for this. SYFROYH Dec 2021 #66
This wasn't worth an OP, but the other woman who previously had a son by the father weighed in: Rhiannon12866 Dec 2021 #70

Response to AngryOldDem (Original post)

maxsolomon

(33,400 posts)
8. You're not serious.
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 04:21 PM
Dec 2021

They are thoughtless fools who thought guns were toys, and missed every red flag their kid raised. It was not designed.

Another Kneejerk DU reaction.

PJMcK

(22,052 posts)
11. That's a stretch
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 04:24 PM
Dec 2021

These parents are simply idiots. They didn’t plan their son’s atrocity, they weapon used the kid.

I don’t think they’re smart enough to plan something this complex.

Rebl2

(13,563 posts)
23. Don't think that
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 05:27 PM
Dec 2021

was their intention. I am in no way defending them buying a gun for their son though.

Walleye

(31,062 posts)
54. Well I really do not understand the gun loving mentality of course I doubt it now but at the time
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 06:46 PM
Dec 2021

Looking into the mother’s eyes in the mug shot just gave me a bad feeling

ShazzieB

(16,541 posts)
24. No.
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 05:28 PM
Dec 2021

Just no. That's not just a bridge too far, it's every bridge over the Mississippi River too far.

They are the type of people who think guns are cool, so they casually bought their son a gun and proudly taught him to use it.

They are also the type of people who bristle and say, "How dare you suggest that OUR little angel has a 'problem' of any kind!" when their son is caught drawing a disturbing picture of a blood soaked shooting victim.

In addition to the above, they are completely devoid of both intelligence and imagination. If they were capable of plotting anything, they would have plotted a better escape for themselves.

DENVERPOPS

(8,847 posts)
27. His mother's text
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 05:33 PM
Dec 2021

learn how to not get caught says a lot.

The Maggots are already shifting the blame to the teachers and school being at fault...........

43. Of course the school's at fault!
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 06:24 PM
Dec 2021

It should have intervened more forcefully in the situation, right? Tell the parents to take the kid home. Also, check his backpack.
Um no, parents, not schools, know what's best for their kids. We just had an election decided on that issue. Of course, one look at the parents might raise doubts about that.

58Sunliner

(4,410 posts)
69. The school official who allowed him to stay at school should be fired.
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 11:54 PM
Dec 2021

That person put the whole school at risk. There should have been protocols in place to respond to just such a situation. The police should have been called in.

taxi

(1,896 posts)
56. I agree. They are escape artists in that way.
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 06:49 PM
Dec 2021

They may have sensed an imminent threat or lurking danger if they stayed at the school too long. So they forged an exit strategy and left. It's the party of personal responsibility type of thing.

Walleye

(31,062 posts)
41. Well I don't necessarily mean they wanted kids killed they just wanted him to shoot
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 06:12 PM
Dec 2021

I don’t think they thought it through that far

Straw Man

(6,625 posts)
60. Highly unlikely.
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 07:04 PM
Dec 2021

It's more probable that they're anti-gubmint wingnuts who aren't going to let any lefty bureaucrats tell them that their disturbed teenager shouldn't be armed. By the way, I haven't heard much talk about the fact that this "Christmas present" that they gave their son was illegal for him to possess, by both state and federal law. There's a whole raft of weapons charges they could be facing in addition to the manslaughter charge.

AngryOldDem

(14,061 posts)
3. Their actions since have been truly mindboggling.
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 03:56 PM
Dec 2021

That’s why I think they’re in it deeper than just providing the weapon.

ForgedCrank

(1,782 posts)
61. There seems to be plenty explanations for
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 07:06 PM
Dec 2021

their actions so far. Some are innocent, some are nefarious.
They could just be simple (dumb). Maybe they ran because all of the hyperbole and gossip has promoted a tsunami of death threats against them? Maybe they told him to do it and ran to escape justice? There are too many possibilities, but it's not really mind boggling, we just don't know what is true yet. But I think it's quite a stretch to think they actually sent him to school to shoot the place up. I won't say never, but that is about the lowest on the probability list. If they did, those two would have been in Mexico before the first round even went off.

Progressive Jones

(6,011 posts)
68. Yeah, they've got something to hide, and now it's going to come out.
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 11:51 PM
Dec 2021

They ran because they know they are headed to prison, even if these charges are brought down
to a lower level.

I have to totally shit on them for running out on their own son the way they did. That alone makes them complete scumbags with no chance of redemption.

Ocelot II

(115,869 posts)
4. Hard to say what their actual intent was, if there even was one,
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 03:58 PM
Dec 2021

though we may find out before long. At best they were negligent parents who were deeply into guns and gun culture, which their kid naturally picked up on. He may have been abused, and he was clearly disturbed. The combination of parental gun-nuttery and negligent supervision with whatever else fucked this kid up was bound to have bad results one way or another.

maxsolomon

(33,400 posts)
13. Homicidal thoughts in teens is not that infrequent.
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 04:27 PM
Dec 2021

Usually suicidal, but these Rampage Shootings are a similar in that there is an homicidal impulse in teens that can be really powerful and sudden, and the presence of the gun makes it instantly realizable.

My sister has seen multiple teen firearm suicides in her time as a school counselor in rural America, and usually no one had a clue till the trigger was pulled.

Young Crumbley's note was clearly a cry for help.

KPN

(15,662 posts)
52. Good observations. They may also just have been in full denial
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 06:40 PM
Dec 2021

wanting dearly for their kid to be normal and trying therefore to treat him as normal, trying to make it so. The parent- child relationship can be extremely complex. Who knows at this point.

I’m not theorizing that is the case here. I frankly don’t know much about it other than it was a horrible and obviously avoidable tragedy involving at least poor judgement or gross negligence on the parents’ part.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
67. This is my take too.
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 09:05 PM
Dec 2021

They were gun nutters who believed the mantra "only criminals use guns criminally." And their son was their little angel who wasn't doing anything wrong trying to buy ammo online on his phone. And that anyone who questioned what their little angel did when it came to his gun fetishism was wrong. That's why they left him at the school that day, after being told their son had red flags, they were like "not my son, fuck them, nothing wrong with gun fetishism." Hell, they probably even liked his drawings of guns and bullets and blood. To "take out the libs."

hamsterjill

(15,224 posts)
7. I think the prosecutor is going to pursue a terrorism charge.
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 04:20 PM
Dec 2021

And rightfully so. She spoke to Anderson Cooper last night about this in the context as it would relate to all of the students in school that day and the lasting effect it will have on those students.

 

Hugh_Lebowski

(33,643 posts)
15. At a minimum they realize that once all the facts are known, relatives give depositions etc
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 04:45 PM
Dec 2021

It's going to look very bad for them in terms of culpability.

But I'm going to wait for actual evidence to start thinking they actually tried to set these events in motion.

Not saying it DIDN'T happen, but ... there's not really evidence of it, and there may well never be.

AngryOldDem

(14,061 posts)
18. True.
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 05:08 PM
Dec 2021

This is just so bizarre. Normally I don’t wear a tin-foil hat. But deserting their kid, withdrawing $4,000 from an ATM, and disabling their phones (per CNN) tells me they were planning to go away for a very long time. Now, I hope that’s true — only behind bars. This case just feels different somehow.

Iggo

(47,571 posts)
34. I think you missed the point.
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 05:49 PM
Dec 2021

I already have it spelled correctly on my dead word list. Then someone comes along and spells it incorrectly and I have to add the incorrectly spelled word to my list as well. Hence the “Dammit!”

(I believe Pistorius had four or five different misspellings. Same with Van Susteren. And for some reason I have several different spellings of Medea on there, though I can’t remember why.)

Response to Iggo (Reply #17)

vlyons

(10,252 posts)
19. I suspect that Ethan was abused
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 05:08 PM
Dec 2021

I have no evidence. I'm just speculating. That kid probably heard over and over and over from one or both parents:

"You're stupid and useless. Can't you do anything right? You'll never amount to anything. Lousy at sports. Can't even make friends." Stuff like that.

ShazzieB

(16,541 posts)
25. I hear you.
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 05:32 PM
Dec 2021

I fully expect to hear some "interesting" things about their child rearing practices as time goes on.

AngryOldDem

(14,061 posts)
38. Well, obviously planning to run out on their kid...
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 06:05 PM
Dec 2021

…doesn’t exactly shout “loving parents”, does it? They were obviously more than happy for him to go this alone here. They were not oblivious to his situation.

58Sunliner

(4,410 posts)
22. Depraved indifference to both the child and the school. Don't know if it meets the legal threshold.
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 05:23 PM
Dec 2021

But the note the kid wrote with the drawing was horrific and they ignored it. Sounds like the kid could be a budding schizophrenic. The parents have qualities of a pair of sociopaths. The school admin is liable too. Why wasn't his backpack searched?? Why wasn't he taken out of school by the admin? A drawing of a gun, looking for ammo should have prompted a risk evaluation leading to questions such as-does the boy have access to a gun, where is the gun, has he had experience shooting a gun, etc..WTF???!!!! It should have been obvious that the parents were incompetent at best.

Bucky

(54,084 posts)
31. I agree. Looking forward to hearing a number of bad parenting gems to come out.
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 05:36 PM
Dec 2021

My money's on Tucker Carlson trying to turn them into martyrs. Something about Gen Z can't take responsibility for anything.

In fact, I expect we'll hear a wide variety of bad takes on this family. Can't wait to see how race, sex, drugs, and religion get dragged into this.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,369 posts)
32. If you are correct, that may be grounds to move the murder charge to juvenile court.
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 05:37 PM
Dec 2021

If he's so dependent on the ideas of his parents, how can he be tried as an adult?

I know, we all want the book thrown at the kid and worse, but ...

DownriverDem

(6,232 posts)
33. Michigan Law
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 05:45 PM
Dec 2021

The prosecutor charged them with what she could. Michigan has been run by repubs off and on for a while. There are both blue and red areas, but it is very pro gun.

paleotn

(17,989 posts)
36. They may not have wanted it to specifically go down like this...
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 05:58 PM
Dec 2021

but..."there's no reason why our strange, anti-social son with obvious issues shouldn't have his own handgun. It's his constitutional right. Freedum!!!"

relayerbob

(6,559 posts)
39. Oh, I think it's beyond that
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 06:07 PM
Dec 2021

He's likely been being abused since he was a baby. I agree with all that you have said, but these are very sick people

70sEraVet

(3,516 posts)
45. As for the parents' intent/culpability, why a pistol?
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 06:26 PM
Dec 2021

They may have been within their legal rights to buy the gun for their son, but why a pistol instead of a hunting rifle? I mean, the purpose of a pistol seems to be shooting PEOPLE. Sure you can shoot at a target, but it just seems like an odd choice for a gift.

AngryOldDem

(14,061 posts)
46. It was a semi-automatic.
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 06:31 PM
Dec 2021

A Sig Sauer, IIRC. Nobody needs something like that, especially a 15-year-old. That alone speaks volumes.

arlyellowdog

(866 posts)
50. They cannot according to the news legal expert
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 06:37 PM
Dec 2021

Michigan law says a minor can only hold a gun on a driving range under the supervision of an adult. This expert (on WTOP) said Michigan law is why they are the 1st parents charged in a mass school shooting.

llmart

(15,555 posts)
51. Yes, and why didn't they wait until Christmas to give it to him if it truly was a gift?
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 06:39 PM
Dec 2021

When the kid gets to talking we're going to find out just how screwed up these two are.

ForgedCrank

(1,782 posts)
53. There is a range of reasons here
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 06:43 PM
Dec 2021

that span the entire spectrum. They may just be flat-out stupid. Could be completely careless, aloof, who knows. As much as I think it's ludicrous, they could even be terrorists. Again, we know little at this point.
There are rumors flying everywhere, and almost all of it is incorrect; we'll find out which eventually. I've even seen stuff floating around about the kid being radicalized against his parents. I don't think we should believe any of it until we see it in a courtroom.
Everyone (meaning that generally) seems to want to use these incidents as leverage, and I find that disturbing to say the least.
At this point, I don't even know if it is appropriate to charge this kid as an adult. He may not be functioning at a normal level, we simply don't know anything as fact yet.
It's really difficult to be patient and allow the system to sort this stuff out in the proper manner, but it's the only fair and reasonable option we have.

Ocelot II

(115,869 posts)
57. Exactly right. I think it's fair to say that there was probably some kind of family dysfunction
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 06:53 PM
Dec 2021

but beyond that we don't know what motivated any of them, and we won't know until there is a trial or other adjudication, if then. It's too easy to assume things but we shouldn't do that.

ForgedCrank

(1,782 posts)
48. I find this manner of thinking to
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 06:34 PM
Dec 2021

be very unsettling.
Some kids are influenced easily, and more often than not, completely against the warnings and coaching from their parents. It is almost as predictable as the sunrise.
Not only do we know little about how this kid was raised, we know almost zero about it.
I'm not going to make any wild judgments until I see this in court and can hear actual facts and evidence because it is completely unreasonable and unfair to do so.

ThoughtCriminal

(14,049 posts)
64. Maybe they were hoping the kid would kill himself
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 08:44 PM
Dec 2021

Problem child? Parents are tired of dealing with him? Self-destructive messages and pleas for help? Perfect gift.

Far fetched? Well, look at how they abandoned him.

Yeah just speculation, but these are really rotten people.


Sogo

(4,997 posts)
65. I had a similar line of thought this morning...
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 08:56 PM
Dec 2021

except that I thought they wanted to have the son do something like this so that he'd spend the rest of his life in jail and thus be out of their lives....

SYFROYH

(34,184 posts)
66. I'd have to see some evidence for this.
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 09:01 PM
Dec 2021

Last edited Sat Dec 4, 2021, 09:47 PM - Edit history (1)

The simple explanation of irresponsible parent gun owners who were in denial about the nature of their troubled kid.

Rhiannon12866

(206,117 posts)
70. This wasn't worth an OP, but the other woman who previously had a son by the father weighed in:
Sun Dec 5, 2021, 05:52 AM
Dec 2021
Woman who has son with Ethan Crumbley's father describes relationship


A Florida woman who has a son with Ethan Crumbley's father Jason describes their relationship.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»My thought about the Crum...