Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWatching Rachel Discuss the recent Jan 6 Select Committee Findings and Releases
I have to ask myself,
Where the fuck is the DoJ?
A Select Committee cant prosecute crimes. They can only make referrals. There is enough here to warrant an investigation and enough for a Grand Jury to decide to charge Trump.
PAGING MERRICK GARLAND!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 616 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Watching Rachel Discuss the recent Jan 6 Select Committee Findings and Releases (Original Post)
berni_mccoy
Dec 2021
OP
Rachel implied that nothing will be done on the federal level. I hope she's wrong.
DeeDeeNY
Dec 2021
#3
dem4decades
(11,301 posts)1. How about a Special Counsel, or whatever Durham is.
brooklynite
(94,679 posts)2. How long does it take you to prepare an ironclad indictment?
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)4. There is no such thing.
DeeDeeNY
(3,356 posts)3. Rachel implied that nothing will be done on the federal level. I hope she's wrong.
Pressuring states to change votes is a federal crime that she said the Justice Dept seems to be choosing to ignore.
brooklynite
(94,679 posts)5. No she didn't...
She has no unique information to determine what DOJ will or will not do. She expressed an opinion, which shes entitled to, along with millions of other citizens.
DeeDeeNY
(3,356 posts)6. Everything she says can only be an opinion
since she has no inside information. I just hope shes wrong.
Poiuyt
(18,129 posts)7. I wonder how Biden feels about his DOJ?
I know he said he wouldn't interfere with that office, but I'll bet he wishes Garland were a little more aggressive.