General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJulian Assange extradition could mean even more legal trouble for Donald Trump
Assange needs to be returned to the US and forced to stand trial
Link to tweet
On Friday, a U.K. court ruled that Assange can be extradited to the U.S. to face espionage charges stemming from his 2010 publication of State Department and Defense Department files provided by Chelsea Manning, a former Army intelligence analyst. As explained in The New York Times, the federal case on Assange asserts that he:
... participated in a criminal hacking conspiracy, both by offering to help Ms. Manning mask her tracks on a secure computer network and by engaging in a broader effort to encourage hackers to obtain secret material and send it to WikiLeaks. The other is that his solicitation and publication of information the government deemed secret violated the Espionage Act......
When questioned by Muellers investigators, Trump denied knowing anything about the RussianWikiLeaks connection. At least 30 times in response to Muellers questions, he said he either had no recollection or he didnt know. But if he was lying to Mueller about his knowledge of any role WikiLeaks or Russia had in assisting his campaign, then he was lying to federal agents and committing a felony. Trumps lies would also have obstructed the special counsel investigation.
Assange may be able to help the U.S. government in exchange for more lenient charges or a plea deal. Prosecutions can make for strange bedfellows. A trade that offers a deal to a thief who steals data, in return for him flipping on someone who tried to steal democracy sounds like a deal worth doing.
Adding to TFG's issues makes me smile
DickKessler
(364 posts)UTUSN
(70,711 posts)Cha
(297,321 posts)too bad.. for both assholes.
former9thward
(32,025 posts)It is doubtful he would know anything specific about the 2016 election.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)his lawyers claimed that tRump offered him a pardon or other way out (via Dana Rohrabacher) if he'd say Russia had nothing to do with the hacking and email thefts from the DNC. Rohrabacher said he visited Assange and made the offer on his own, not for tRump. Assange and Wikileaks were extremely valuable to tRump and the GOP.
I find it very credible that neither tRump nor the GOP leadership would want him making a deal with the U.S. in return for testimony.
struggle4progress
(118,295 posts)sometimes functions as a rightwing Russian stooge
He has attracted a constant swarm of publicity-seeking hack lawyers in much the same way as Rump attracted a swarm of hacks; and nothing informative will be forthcoming from any of those counselors or their client
I have no idea whether he could be convicted -- but he would have been charged under Obama, if DoJ had had a clear case then; and we should wonder if any new real evidence could have emerged during the Rump years, given the incompetent chaotic mess the Orangetan made of everything
My best guess is that the Rump gang charged Ass***e because he had been involved in some of their stunts and so him blabbing could make them look bad, unless they could discredit him by sticking him in jail
Bottom line: Rump and Ass***e will both try to deliver a gigantic shit-show