Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(145,321 posts)
Wed Dec 15, 2021, 02:58 PM Dec 2021

Julian Assange extradition could mean even more legal trouble for Donald Trump

Assange needs to be returned to the US and forced to stand trial




Former President Donald Trump already faces a future filled with legal battles in multiple federal, state and local jurisdictions from Georgia to the District of Columbia to New York state and Manhattan. And, now, a British court decision against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange could resurrect the two seminal questions from special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation: Did Trump obstruct justice, and did his campaign collude with Russia? Assange, an Australian citizen sitting in Her Majesty’s Prison Belmarsh in southeast London, may hold the key that reopens the prosecutive possibilities.

On Friday, a U.K. court ruled that Assange can be extradited to the U.S. to face espionage charges stemming from his 2010 publication of State Department and Defense Department files provided by Chelsea Manning, a former Army intelligence analyst. As explained in The New York Times, the federal case on Assange asserts that he:

“... participated in a criminal hacking conspiracy, both by offering to help Ms. Manning mask her tracks on a secure computer network and by engaging in a broader effort to encourage hackers to obtain secret material and send it to WikiLeaks. The other is that his solicitation and publication of information the government deemed secret violated the Espionage Act.”.....

When questioned by Mueller’s investigators, Trump denied knowing anything about the Russian–WikiLeaks connection. At least 30 times in response to Mueller’s questions, he said he either had “no recollection” or he “didn’t know.” But if he was lying to Mueller about his knowledge of any role WikiLeaks or Russia had in assisting his campaign, then he was lying to federal agents and committing a felony. Trump’s lies would also have obstructed the special counsel investigation.

Assange may be able to help the U.S. government in exchange for more lenient charges or a plea deal. Prosecutions can make for strange bedfellows. A trade that offers a deal to a thief who steals data, in return for him flipping on someone who tried to steal democracy sounds like a deal worth doing.

Adding to TFG's issues makes me smile
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Julian Assange extradition could mean even more legal trouble for Donald Trump (Original Post) LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2021 OP
Ruh roh. DickKessler Dec 2021 #1
So when is the entire Vesuvius thing going to finally do its big burp on him?! UTUSN Dec 2021 #2
Rt TY.. aww that's Cha Dec 2021 #3
Assange has been in continuous custody since the first term of the Obama administration. former9thward Dec 2021 #4
When Assange went to court in Britain to avoid extradition to the U.S., Hortensis Dec 2021 #5
Ass***e isn't going to clarify anything: he's a narcissist who struggle4progress Dec 2021 #6

former9thward

(32,025 posts)
4. Assange has been in continuous custody since the first term of the Obama administration.
Wed Dec 15, 2021, 03:38 PM
Dec 2021

It is doubtful he would know anything specific about the 2016 election.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
5. When Assange went to court in Britain to avoid extradition to the U.S.,
Wed Dec 15, 2021, 04:50 PM
Dec 2021

his lawyers claimed that tRump offered him a pardon or other way out (via Dana Rohrabacher) if he'd say Russia had nothing to do with the hacking and email thefts from the DNC. Rohrabacher said he visited Assange and made the offer on his own, not for tRump. Assange and Wikileaks were extremely valuable to tRump and the GOP.

I find it very credible that neither tRump nor the GOP leadership would want him making a deal with the U.S. in return for testimony.

struggle4progress

(118,295 posts)
6. Ass***e isn't going to clarify anything: he's a narcissist who
Wed Dec 15, 2021, 10:22 PM
Dec 2021

sometimes functions as a rightwing Russian stooge

He has attracted a constant swarm of publicity-seeking hack lawyers in much the same way as Rump attracted a swarm of hacks; and nothing informative will be forthcoming from any of those counselors or their client

I have no idea whether he could be convicted -- but he would have been charged under Obama, if DoJ had had a clear case then; and we should wonder if any new real evidence could have emerged during the Rump years, given the incompetent chaotic mess the Orangetan made of everything

My best guess is that the Rump gang charged Ass***e because he had been involved in some of their stunts and so him blabbing could make them look bad, unless they could discredit him by sticking him in jail

Bottom line: Rump and Ass***e will both try to deliver a gigantic shit-show

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Julian Assange extraditio...