Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Until we can get a super majority in congress (Original Post) Beachnutt Dec 2021 OP
We don't need a supermajority. dawg Dec 2021 #1
Well, until we kill the filibuster, we actually need 60 reliable votes in the Senate. MineralMan Dec 2021 #4
lol well that didn't take long leftstreet Dec 2021 #2
No confusion. That poster is correct. MineralMan Dec 2021 #5
Yes. That should be our response. MineralMan Dec 2021 #3
K&R 2naSalit Dec 2021 #6
When we had 59/60 in 2009 wellst0nev0ter Dec 2021 #7
THIS. LowerManhattanite Dec 2021 #9
been there, done that Diablo del sol Dec 2021 #8
Obama now regrets not getting rid of the filibuster when he should have wellst0nev0ter Dec 2021 #10
we technically only need 50 Dems who will finally trash the filibuster, BUT that is Celerity Dec 2021 #11

dawg

(10,624 posts)
1. We don't need a supermajority.
Sun Dec 19, 2021, 12:03 PM
Dec 2021

We just need 50 reliable votes. We are (at least) two short of that number.

MineralMan

(146,324 posts)
4. Well, until we kill the filibuster, we actually need 60 reliable votes in the Senate.
Sun Dec 19, 2021, 12:17 PM
Dec 2021

Let's do that, and end this nonsense.

leftstreet

(36,111 posts)
2. lol well that didn't take long
Sun Dec 19, 2021, 12:05 PM
Dec 2021

there's usually a complimentary grieving/confusion period before the scolding begins

MineralMan

(146,324 posts)
5. No confusion. That poster is correct.
Sun Dec 19, 2021, 12:18 PM
Dec 2021

We need at least 60 votes in the Senate. That would solve everything. Until then, we can be held up by any Democratic Senator.

 

wellst0nev0ter

(7,509 posts)
7. When we had 59/60 in 2009
Sun Dec 19, 2021, 02:32 PM
Dec 2021

The same people were saying "if only we had a couple or five votes to get around Joe Lieberman."

The argument was insanely stupid and demoralizing then, and it's insanely stupid and demoralizing now.

 

Diablo del sol

(424 posts)
8. been there, done that
Sun Dec 19, 2021, 02:36 PM
Dec 2021

Some of us remember 2008 and the rat fucking done to keep Franken from being seated.

The system is broken, pushing for a Super Majority allows many Dems to point fingers back at youth vote for being the issue.

So the magic number of 60 is like believing in Santa Clause.

The number isn't 60, because it will always allow those to defend Senators from "red states" of doing what is needed to get reelected.

Add five or ten more, more excuses.

 

wellst0nev0ter

(7,509 posts)
10. Obama now regrets not getting rid of the filibuster when he should have
Sun Dec 19, 2021, 02:52 PM
Dec 2021

From his book "A Promised Land"



I wonder what "regrets" we will have when we look back upon this moment a decade later.

Celerity

(43,479 posts)
11. we technically only need 50 Dems who will finally trash the filibuster, BUT that is
Sun Dec 19, 2021, 03:47 PM
Dec 2021

highly unlikely to happen

there are more than just Manchin and Sinema and Feinstein who are against doing away with the filibuster overall

I would say a total of 11 or so atm

so unless we primary them out AND win the general (massively hard in many cases) we likely will NOT get to 50 who will vote to bin the filibuster, as the red held seats that we can actually win (and win with anti filibuster candidates) are not that many

I will drill down

anti bin the filibuster (entirely) Dems atm

Manchin
Sinema
Feinstein
Tester
Carper
Hickenlooper
Angus King
Coons
Warner
Shaheen
Hassan


if all of those refuse, that puts us at 39 who will bin it

now lets start adding new ones who WILL bin it

Feinstein's replacement (even if she insanely tries to run again, she will lose the promary, she is well past her expiry date, and CA will not vote for a Senator who will be 98 at the end of her next terms)

Sinema is going down in the 2024 primary, likely to Gallego

the rest of the 9 left are either untouchable in a primary or if they ca be defeated, that pro nuke the filibuster candidate cannot win the state

so we are now at 41 binners

we need NINE new pickups, 10 of we lose POTUS

I will list every remote possibility (over the next few elections)and some of these are big big reaches, and some are not for years from now

NC
NC
PA
WI
FL
FL
OH
ME (Collins)
TX (Cruz)
KY (if Moscow Mitch retires)
TN (Blackburn, and the ONLY Dem who can win there is Tim McGraw, who was TWICE now turned down open seat races)


there is 11, but the best I can see out of that is winning 6

and do not lose any incumbents who support binning it

and

we also need to hold POTUS

or you can add ANOTHER one needed (so we have 51)

and I cannot find another new state where we can pick up a seat, SO one of the 9 remaining blockers would have to flip to bin

if we win 6 new binners and lose no incumbent binners

we are at 47 binners (provided, like I said, we gain AZ and Ca as two new binners)


we need to flip three of the 9 'no bins' left, 4 if we lose POTUS

these are the most realistic to get to change to bin

Carper
Hickenlooper
Coons
Warner
Shaheen


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Until we can get a super ...