General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBeyondGeography
(39,386 posts)Rings a bell.
aocommunalpunch
(4,245 posts)Yup. Get the donor money out or ALL of this is meaningless. We currently have oligarchs paying bribes. The rest is theater.
Dustlawyer
(10,497 posts)hadEnuf
(2,218 posts)That's why the Right Wing SCOTUS supported it and made it legal.
It all boils down to whether it legal or not and then enforcing the law if it is not legal. There is no mid point in this with the Right Wing in this country. If it's illegal then nail them. No passes or slaps on the wrist any more.
IronLionZion
(45,561 posts)and against the big money that he relies on to win his very narrow elections in his very small rural state.
BlueTsunami2018
(3,505 posts)Not ever. The minority opinion has always ruled here.
MineralMan
(146,338 posts)Who creates that, I wonder? Be careful what you ask for. You might not be anticipating the reality of it completely.
Demsrule86
(68,714 posts)come from? Many on our side doesn't bother to vote in local elections according to polling which is a form of political suicide as they are equally important to national elections. The open seats will be won by moderates or not at all...even Vermont has a GOP governor. Please note that three of the seats Nevada, Georgia, and Arizona are Democratic seats...we could lose one or all in the midterm.
MineralMan
(146,338 posts)for us to really try. Not just to accept the conventional wisdom, but to go all out to change that interesting chart you posted.
I did not think that we would win in Georgia, either. Mirabile dictu, though, we did win. And there you have the example of what i think might be possible elsewhere, too.
It's up to all Democrats, I think. We have the numbers needed to win, but not the midterm participation at the polls. Let's fix that and move forward.
bucolic_frolic
(43,361 posts)We need to get the money out of politics. Legislators are seated with money, lobbied with money, the legislation reflects money, the legislators want to remain in power with all this money. People are not very relevant in this formula.
mahina
(17,712 posts)BadgerMom
(2,771 posts)The federal remedy would be a Constitutional convention, something the Kochs and their far right cronies are salivating for. Id like to avoid that. But I also believe change is required if were to remain viable.
mahina
(17,712 posts)BadgerMom
(2,771 posts)mahina
(17,712 posts)Its not a new idea and its been enacted in some states. Most of their YouTube vids are several years old
Response to bucolic_frolic (Reply #5)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
OldBaldy1701E
(5,173 posts)You want this fixed? Start here.
Until this is changed, nothing is going to change. When the wealthy have the majority in our legislature, their desire for more money will always win out. Why will this not change as society currently stands? UNFETTERED CAPITALISM, BABY!
It is what we all want, isn't it?
Demsrule86
(68,714 posts)jaxexpat
(6,860 posts)State in the union.
KS Toronado
(17,364 posts)And I understand why people are upset with him especially after appearing on FQX, no less.
But let us remember that not one single reQublican will vote for BBB also.
Oligarchy, crippled Supreme Court, weak voter protections, representation imbalance in the senate of Lords, rampant dark money and general corruption, and flowery rhetoric with little action.
Change is definitely called for.
CaptainTruth
(6,607 posts)mn9driver
(4,428 posts)And it has been for a long time. Its just becoming harder and harder to hide with each election cycle.
Freddie
(9,275 posts)CrispyQ
(36,539 posts)TheRickles
(2,090 posts)For example, the total population of the 21 least populous states doesn't match California's population of 35 million. Yet they get 42 Senators to California's two!! That's why places like Wyoming, Idaho, North Dakota, South Dakota and, yes, West Virginia, have such a disproportionate influence in Congress.
It was one of the original compromises to get all 13 colonies on board back in 1776, and that's why there's no easy way to undo it.
Traildogbob
(8,830 posts)Country could wake up and take our country pack from the oligarchs, we should all agree to vote for everybody that spends the least amount on a campaign. Totally ignore media promoted candidates, let em burn up their cash. Ask for bottom line receipts, those that will not release campaign spending, but, bye. Ridiculous I know. But its Christmas time, we can dream happy thoughts, right.
Jon King
(1,910 posts)I have no idea why America is referred to as a democracy. It simply is nothing close to a democracy in any way. Electoral college, Senate system, ability to out line districts with no guidelines, unlimited corporate donations.
We really need to stop this sick joke of pretending this is a democracy.
Thunderbeast
(3,424 posts)The founders believed in a moral superiority of white gentleman farmers. The economic system that kept the "masters" in the plantation mansions using free labor was enshrined in the founding documents. The slave owners were tempted to go their own way, or stay under royal rule in order to preserve their economic system. In the antebellum south, human beings were, by far, the largest capital asset driving the agricultural economy.
In order to get all thirteen colonies to buy in to the revolution, small rural states were granted great political advantage.
sarisataka
(18,819 posts)The US is not a "healthy democracy " or any other kind of democracy. It is a republic.
People use the terms interchangeably but they are not synonymous
hay rick
(7,648 posts)It's easier to break things than to fix them. Fixing looks different to different people and can only be accomplished by broad consensus or by force. We will likely continue to limp along in our current dysfunction until we hit a real crisis. Covid seems not to have been that crisis, although Omicron could still change that. My bet is on climate change to end our current experiment in self-governance.
Zeitghost
(3,873 posts)In no way allows a single Senator to thwart anything. The Constitution isn't hard to read or difficult to understand on this issue. Joe Manchin has a single 1 out of 100 vote just like every other Senator.
former9thward
(32,097 posts)The Senate is filled with rules. For example just one senator can put a "hold" on a nominee even though the majority want to confirm that nominee.
kentuck
(111,110 posts)Unfortunately, Manchin is in a strategic position where he can vote against his Party and be more popular in the next election.
In order to change that equation, we must change the 50/50 Senate.
Duppers
(28,127 posts)Seeing this. Sorry.
Excellent point made: we need structural change.
Uncle Joe
(58,453 posts)Thanks for the thread kpete.