New Finding on bombing video and Boebert.

[Grasswire2]

Shocking.

[link:http://

Link to tweet

?s=20|

[MontanaMama]

1. The Q party continues to enjoy no consequences

for any of their illegal activity. Really frustrating.

[jimfields33]

4. Is she registered? That's the one and only question to this.

She needs to answer it.

[MontanaMama]

5. Registered as/for what?

Not sure I get what you're saying.

[Kingofalldems]

23. Nope. A lot more questions than that.

[Takket]

2. so.......

this isn't the alley the pipebomber was walking down

it isn't behind the capital hill club but is a block or so away...

is this supposed to prove something?

[AZSkiffyGeek]

3. That a rando named "The Pee Tape" is considered a reliable source?

[Grasswire2]

6. I gather you haven't been following much on twitter. nt

[Caliman73]

7. I am not on Twitter...

I don't think a lot of people on DU are on Twitter or follow "The Pee Pee Tape" and the like. This is why when posts like this without context are put up, there is generally some kind of push back about context.

It won't kill anyone to put a few sentences about the tweet and the context in which it would be relevant to know about.

[AZSkiffyGeek]

8. I follow a lot on Twitter.

I don't follow random conspiracy theory accounts named "The Pee Tape."

[Grasswire2]

10. well, I'm not going to use my time to educate you.

I realize that twitter isn't for everyone.

[AZSkiffyGeek]

11. If you can't tell the difference between news, analysis and "The Pee Tape"

I won't bother educating you either, okay?

[demmiblue]

13. !

[Progressive Jones]

20. LMAO! nt

[Grasswire2]

18. LOLOL

Knock yourself out.

[Grasswire2]

12. those who have been following the behavioral psychologist who has been forensically studying..

...every aspect of the bombing event know that he has developed a scenario based on the evidence. The scenario includes the likelihood that the bomber was very familiar with the location and had prior contacts in the near vicinity.

This new finding shows evidence toward that theory.

One more tidbit.

Of course, many people believe that law enforcement already knows the identity of the bomber. How could our top law enforcement agency NOT know, a year in?

[AZSkiffyGeek]

14. Hint

Reputable behavioral psychologists don't post their random findings in Twitter threads. So go on with your Pee Tape saying that Greene walking in an alley is proof she's the bomber because someone else claiming expertise (and unchecked) is apparently doing a free analysis for Twitterworld, but for some reason isn't working with the FBI.

[Grasswire2]

17. First, it isn't Greene.

You might want to read a post before you try to blow it off.

Why would the FBI "work with" anyone? They've had a year to ID a suspect in the biggest crime in American history -- a significant part of the plot.

It is foolish to think the FBI (our premier law enforcement agency) doesn't already have the ID. If it was a nobody, we would have been told the identity long ago.

Done with you.

[AZSkiffyGeek]

19. My mistake in confusing them

Especially since the “expert” you’re touting with this revelation from the “Pee Tape” is saying it’s Greene, and not Boebert.

[Grasswire2]

22. that's how things go in crowd-sourced investigations

A tidbit here, a tidbit there. From here, from there. Working on evidence scoured from dozens of sources and places. A parlor game, of sorts.

Of course our premier law enforcement agency surely already has the identity of the bomber. If they don't, we must wonder what kind of shop is working on the largest crime in American history.

Why don't they reveal the identity? If it was a nobody, we would know that by now.

It's all really marvelous fun for skiffy geeks as well as for those who have skin in the game.

[AZSkiffyGeek]

21. They need to get one of those "enhance" machines

From Blade Runner. Then they could probably tell who it was.

[mahina]

9. I wish it proved anything.

No

[AZSkiffyGeek]

15. It proves PT Barnum was right

[mahina]

16. Lol

Yep

[Kingofalldems]

24. Kick and rec for Trump's secret pals.

[Tommy Carcetti]

25. Meh. Boebert's a bonafide POS, but this isn't any real smoking gun.

Just weird.

[Kingofalldems]

28. No but brings up the fact that this crime needs to be solved.

[Kingofalldems]

26. Here is video of the bomber:

This is an integral part of the crime of the century, Jan. 6.

[Kingofalldems]

27. Was the bomb actually left at the RNC?

Link to tweet