General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJudge: Prince Andrew can't halt lawsuit with domicile claim
NEW YORK (AP) Prince Andrews effort to immediately block the progression of a lawsuit by a woman who says he sexually assaulted her when she was 17 on the grounds that she no longer lives in the U.S. was rejected by a federal judge as oral arguments were set to proceed Monday on the prince's request to dismiss the lawsuit.
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan, in a written order Friday, told the princes lawyers they must turn over documents on the schedule that has been set in the lawsuit brought in August by Virginia Giuffre. Giuffre says she was abused by the prince on multiple occasions in 2001 while she was being sexually abused by financier Jeffrey Epstein. The princes attorney, Andrew Brettler, has called the lawsuit baseless.
The order was filed three days before the scheduled public release Monday of a 2009 settlement agreement between Epstein and Giuffre. Lawyers for Andrew say that the agreement protects the prince from claims like those brought by Giuffre and will be sufficient grounds for the lawsuit's dismissal.
The prince's lawyers had claimed that the evidence was so strong that Giuffre does not reside in the United States that it was pointless to exchange evidence until that question is resolved because it could result in the lawsuit's dismissal.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/judge-prince-andrew-can-t-halt-lawsuit-with-domicile-claim/ar-AASl7Z4
XanaDUer2
(10,681 posts)Nt
PJMcK
(22,037 posts)And a motherfucker.
bahboo
(16,339 posts)Scrivener7
(50,954 posts)"protects the prince from claims like those brought by Giuffre," doesn't that pretty much mean that Epstein felt Andrew needed protection from claims like those brought by Giuffre?
Isn't Andrew's statement about the agreement pretty much an admission of guilt?