Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat are the statistics on diversity in all spheres of American lives these days?
And what about inter-/racial marriage?
Despite attempts by the racists and their spokespersons, the USA continues to diversify.
Keep on fighting folks.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 809 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What are the statistics on diversity in all spheres of American lives these days? (Original Post)
malaise
Jan 2022
OP
Marginalizing the opposition - the only rational solution - will not change them
bucolic_frolic
Jan 2022
#1
If you are also asking about more diversity in living here is the Dissimilarity Index.
JanMichael
Jan 2022
#6
bucolic_frolic
(43,162 posts)1. Marginalizing the opposition - the only rational solution - will not change them
and they are virulent and violent. I don't see the progress we're making. Free-thinking people are scared into silence. Even if insurrectionists are behind bars, I don't see this issue softening. It might get worse as they are shunned, as they retreat into their bunkers, as they lose economic opportunity.
Klaralven
(7,510 posts)2. U.S. Approval of Interracial Marriage at New High of 94%
https://news.gallup.com/poll/354638/approval-interracial-marriage-new-high.aspx
Also, from https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2017/05/18/1-trends-and-patterns-in-intermarriage/
Also, from https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2017/05/18/1-trends-and-patterns-in-intermarriage/
Intermarriage varies by race and ethnicity
Overall increases in intermarriage have been fueled in part by rising intermarriage rates among black newlyweds and among white newlyweds. The share of recently married blacks with a spouse of a different race or ethnicity has more than tripled, from 5% in 1980 to 18% in 2015. Among recently married whites, rates have more than doubled, from 4% up to 11%.
At the same time, intermarriage has ticked down among recently married Asians and remained more or less stable among Hispanic newlyweds. Even though intermarriage has not been increasing for these two groups, they remain far more likely than black or white newlyweds to marry someone of a different race or ethnicity. About three-in-ten Asian newlyweds (29%) have a spouse of a different race or ethnicity. The same is true of 27% of Hispanics.
For newly married Hispanics and Asians, the likelihood of intermarriage is closely related to whether they were born in the U.S. or abroad. Among the half of Hispanic newlyweds who are immigrants, 15% married a non-Hispanic. In comparison, 39% of the U.S. born did so. The pattern is similar among Asian newlyweds, three-fourths of whom are immigrants. While 24% of foreign-born Asian newlyweds have a spouse of a different race or ethnicity, this share rises to 46% among the U.S. born.
Overall increases in intermarriage have been fueled in part by rising intermarriage rates among black newlyweds and among white newlyweds. The share of recently married blacks with a spouse of a different race or ethnicity has more than tripled, from 5% in 1980 to 18% in 2015. Among recently married whites, rates have more than doubled, from 4% up to 11%.
At the same time, intermarriage has ticked down among recently married Asians and remained more or less stable among Hispanic newlyweds. Even though intermarriage has not been increasing for these two groups, they remain far more likely than black or white newlyweds to marry someone of a different race or ethnicity. About three-in-ten Asian newlyweds (29%) have a spouse of a different race or ethnicity. The same is true of 27% of Hispanics.
For newly married Hispanics and Asians, the likelihood of intermarriage is closely related to whether they were born in the U.S. or abroad. Among the half of Hispanic newlyweds who are immigrants, 15% married a non-Hispanic. In comparison, 39% of the U.S. born did so. The pattern is similar among Asian newlyweds, three-fourths of whom are immigrants. While 24% of foreign-born Asian newlyweds have a spouse of a different race or ethnicity, this share rises to 46% among the U.S. born.
malaise
(269,003 posts)3. Very interesting
There is more diversity and more acceptance of diversity
jmbar2
(4,886 posts)4. Much more diversity in TV ads
I've been noticing how much more diverse TV ads have become, including portrayals of mixed marriages/families.
A noticeable increase
Happy New Year
JanMichael
(24,887 posts)6. If you are also asking about more diversity in living here is the Dissimilarity Index.
https://www.censusscope.org/about_dissimilarity.html
To help explain: "A dissimilarity index of 0 indicates conditions of total integration under which both groups are distributed in the same proportions across all neighborhoods. A dissimilarity index of 100 indicates conditions of total segregation such that the members of one group are located in completely different neighborhoods than the second group. Neither extreme value is generally seen in most cities and metropolitan areas. Rather the value typically lies somewhere in-between 0 and 100."
And:
"If a city's white-black dissimilarity index were 65, that would mean that 65% of white people would need to move to another neighborhood to make whites and blacks evenly distributed across all neighborhoods."
Here is LA:
Dissimilarity Indices
Dissimilarity Index Percent of
With Whites* Population** Total Population
White* -- 2,959,614 31.09%
Black* 70.5 901,472 9.47%
American Indian* 48.4 25,609 0.27%
Asian* 51.8 1,124,569 11.81%
Native Hawaiian* 68.6 23,265 0.24%
Other* 46.1 19,935 0.21%
Two or More Races* 30.7 222,661 2.34%
White/Black* 44.6 19,427 0.20%
White/American Indian* 36.1 17,706 0.19%
White/Asian* 28.2 48,762 0.51%
White/Other* 45.1 70,109 0.74%
Other Combinations* -- 66,657 0.70%
Hispanic 64.4 4,242,213 44.56%
Total Population -- 9,519,338 100.00%
EDIT - This site is better to see trends:
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/release?rid=419
To help explain: "A dissimilarity index of 0 indicates conditions of total integration under which both groups are distributed in the same proportions across all neighborhoods. A dissimilarity index of 100 indicates conditions of total segregation such that the members of one group are located in completely different neighborhoods than the second group. Neither extreme value is generally seen in most cities and metropolitan areas. Rather the value typically lies somewhere in-between 0 and 100."
And:
"If a city's white-black dissimilarity index were 65, that would mean that 65% of white people would need to move to another neighborhood to make whites and blacks evenly distributed across all neighborhoods."
Here is LA:
Dissimilarity Indices
Dissimilarity Index Percent of
With Whites* Population** Total Population
White* -- 2,959,614 31.09%
Black* 70.5 901,472 9.47%
American Indian* 48.4 25,609 0.27%
Asian* 51.8 1,124,569 11.81%
Native Hawaiian* 68.6 23,265 0.24%
Other* 46.1 19,935 0.21%
Two or More Races* 30.7 222,661 2.34%
White/Black* 44.6 19,427 0.20%
White/American Indian* 36.1 17,706 0.19%
White/Asian* 28.2 48,762 0.51%
White/Other* 45.1 70,109 0.74%
Other Combinations* -- 66,657 0.70%
Hispanic 64.4 4,242,213 44.56%
Total Population -- 9,519,338 100.00%
EDIT - This site is better to see trends:
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/release?rid=419
malaise
(269,003 posts)7. Very important stats
Thanks - let me have a look at that link. Happy New Year