Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Turborama

(22,109 posts)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 03:51 AM Oct 2012

'Think Progress' Smears BRAD BLOG Coverage of Voting Machine Concerns as 'Conspiracy Theory'

To be frank, while it's no secret that the Center for American Progress has always been an outside extension of the Democratic Party, their important blog site, Think Progress, has served as a crucial, and journalistically sound fact-checker on the excesses, inaccuracies and blatant fabrications of the Right over the past several years.

I have been more than happy to cite their excellent work on a number of fronts over the years and take no pleasure in calling them, their new Senior Editor Judd Legum, and one of their writers, Aviva Shen, out here on The BRAD BLOG for an egregious and, frankly, outrageous journalistic failure.

It is one thing to make an error. We all do it. It is quite another thing indeed --- and what, in my opinion, separates real journalists from hacks --- when, once called out with independently fact-based and verifiable evidence of those errors, one sticks to the original error come what may.

That's exactly what Legum and Think Progress have decided to do, as the email discussion between Legum and me illustrates below...

Continues here: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=9653

36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Think Progress' Smears BRAD BLOG Coverage of Voting Machine Concerns as 'Conspiracy Theory' (Original Post) Turborama Oct 2012 OP
That's disgusting. Brad has been the most valuable reporter on elections since Palast. freshwest Oct 2012 #1
Exactly! It's a shame we haven't heard anything from Palast or Robert F. Kennedy Jr. lately Turborama Oct 2012 #2
I saw Palast on Bill Press' show yesterday morning Oilwellian Oct 2012 #21
It is EXTREMELY easy to rig the count on electronic voting machines Ian62 Oct 2012 #3
Great research! ProudProgressiveNow Oct 2012 #27
Think Progress, Judd Legum, and Aviva Shen all put their reputations at risk by glossing over Kurovski Oct 2012 #29
Did Think Progress get some out of work DLC types? Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2012 #4
Judd Legum is on Stephanie Miller at least 1x a week.... kooljerk666 Oct 2012 #5
He's on Bill Press once a week...the show that comes on before hers ejbr Oct 2012 #6
yup I believe Tuesday is his day......... kooljerk666 Oct 2012 #9
His name is Igor ejbr Oct 2012 #10
Halloween & Frankenstein & THe classics........... kooljerk666 Oct 2012 #11
This is how I got chased off of DailyKos ejbr Oct 2012 #7
the underground was at the forefront of the voting machine "conspiracy" madrchsod Oct 2012 #8
I agree with the Think Progress report PeaceNikki Oct 2012 #12
That is always the excuse marions ghost Oct 2012 #13
I don't think it's an 'excuse for not looking at the problem' at all. PeaceNikki Oct 2012 #15
Two counties??? marions ghost Oct 2012 #16
sorry, no time. I'll be busy GOTV. PeaceNikki Oct 2012 #17
Suggest to buy it and read it on or after election day... marions ghost Oct 2012 #18
Will do! PeaceNikki Oct 2012 #34
No prob marions ghost Oct 2012 #35
fucking weak sauce.. frylock Oct 2012 #20
You fail to see the irony? Oilwellian Oct 2012 #22
+100,000 Kurovski Oct 2012 #30
Read! nt ProudProgressiveNow Oct 2012 #28
spread it marions ghost Oct 2012 #31
How do you ignore the root of the issue...proof is not possible? TheKentuckian Oct 2012 #19
Are you really that naive? Seriously?? Living under a rock, maybe? nt. OldDem2012 Oct 2012 #32
Did you have any points to make or are you just showing how shitty you can be when you disagree? PeaceNikki Oct 2012 #33
How would you explain ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2012 #23
It doesn't matter if you agree with them or not, they are factually incorrect. reusrename Oct 2012 #24
Oh great marions ghost Oct 2012 #14
I believe "garbage" is the latest Rovian term d'jour Blue Owl Oct 2012 #25
Maybe this is good, if a back and forth would occur maybe this would get flamingdem Oct 2012 #26
It's one thing to say Now Is Not The Time, but another to dismiss evidence. Did our Democratic Overseas Oct 2012 #36

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
1. That's disgusting. Brad has been the most valuable reporter on elections since Palast.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 04:21 AM
Oct 2012

Those alleged 'conspiracies' have resulted in real world convictions for election fraud. The reason Brad reports these things is not to discourage voting, but to get better verification. Screw 'em.

Turborama

(22,109 posts)
2. Exactly! It's a shame we haven't heard anything from Palast or Robert F. Kennedy Jr. lately
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 04:43 AM
Oct 2012

And as far as Think Progress are concerned, it's very disappointing to have to say "screw 'em", as I've been visiting their site for years, but I'm 100% behind Brad Blog on this one.

 

Ian62

(604 posts)
3. It is EXTREMELY easy to rig the count on electronic voting machines
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 05:16 AM
Oct 2012

There have been lots of studies done, loads of articles about it and even one or two court cases.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacking_Democracy

http://www.rawstory.com/rawreplay/2011/09/diebold-voting-machines-hacked-with-10-in-parts/

A quick google search
https://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&sclient=psy-ab&q=hacking+voting+machine&oq=hacking+voting+machine&gs_l=hp.3..0j0i7i30l2j0i30j0i5i30j0i8i30.165282.166679.2.168484.8.8.0.0.0.0.115.711.4j4.8.0.les%3B..0.0...1c.1.qJIUNdrTmdE&psj=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.&fp=4a762d82895734c9&bpcl=35466521&biw=1024&bih=587

One of the court cases
http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/2750/blowing_the_whistle_on_diebold/

CNN - it only takes 1 minute to hack a voting machine



It's not as if it is a partisan issue - both sides of the aisle agree.
http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2011/09/30/researchers-hack-voting-machine-for-26/#ixzz1ZRqR9Unf (Beware this link is from Fox.)

states with electronic voting
http://www.verifiedvoting.org/

The US vote counting system is one of the least secure systems in the entire world.
Even Venezuela has a more secure and less prone to fraud system.

Kurovski

(34,655 posts)
29. Think Progress, Judd Legum, and Aviva Shen all put their reputations at risk by glossing over
Thu Oct 25, 2012, 03:23 AM
Oct 2012

Last edited Thu Oct 25, 2012, 05:06 AM - Edit history (1)

election theft.

 

kooljerk666

(776 posts)
9. yup I believe Tuesday is his day.........
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 08:11 AM
Oct 2012

I just figured that out as I was watching Bill Press this AM, some guy named Boris was on this AM, he works with Judd Legum.

Bill is playing on DVR and am an hour behind so too late to try to call & I do not know enuff about the issue to be an effective PIA.

I will by next Tuesday though.

ejbr

(5,856 posts)
7. This is how I got chased off of DailyKos
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 07:05 AM
Oct 2012

They called me a conspiracy theorist because I did not have the proof that the voting machine patent laws prevents anyone from getting. Since you can't prove it, it's a conspiracy. One would think that intelligent people might consider that this is part of the thieves' plans!

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
8. the underground was at the forefront of the voting machine "conspiracy"
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 08:10 AM
Oct 2012

unfortunately we were right.

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
12. I agree with the Think Progress report
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 08:33 AM
Oct 2012

"The rigged machines myth is not only distracting, but harms the effort to get out the vote. Conservative groups have been promoting vote suppression tactics for a reason: votes count. In Ohio, for instance, despite the Republican Party’s best efforts to restrict early voting hours, voter turnout is on pace to surpass 2008, with Obama leading among people who have already voted. Spreading the myth that the system is so corrupt that these votes don’t matter tells voters they may as well sit out the election."

http://thinkprogress.org/election/2012/10/22/1059171/why-romney-isnt-rigging-the-voting-machines/

marions ghost

(19,841 posts)
13. That is always the excuse
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 08:51 AM
Oct 2012

for not looking at the problem. You'll "harm the effort to get out the vote." I doubt it. What it does is bury the whole issue and is a disservice to the voters--they need to know what to look out for esp if they vote by touchscreen.

PLEASE GET A COPY of the latest (Nov) "Harpers" -- an article "How to Rig An Election" is absolutely the best current article out there about the whole issue. I think you'll change your mind.

http://harpers.org/blog/2012/10/an-excerpt-from-how-to-rig-an-election/

ALSO -- http://election.democraticunderground.com/10021571994

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
15. I don't think it's an 'excuse for not looking at the problem' at all.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 09:03 AM
Oct 2012

I think the disservice is stating that something like this *is* happening without proof. Especially since those machines are only being used in 2 counties.

In addition, the TP piece goes on to discuss the idea that it can distract from other suppression and cheating tactics.

Again, I agree with TP.


And... on edit: I don't think anyone is saying 'don't look!', only... don't publicly state it's happening without proof. There's a difference.

marions ghost

(19,841 posts)
16. Two counties???
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 09:14 AM
Oct 2012
What in the world are u talking about

Go here and look at the map:
http://verifiedvoting.org/

A BILLION was spent (so-called Help America Vote Act--2002) to bring UN-verified, UNreliable, vote-switching, Republican manufactured, secret "proprietary" coded DRE touchscreen voting to America. They are being replaced completely in Maryland, as they have been in Germany and Ireland--in favor of ye olde paper optiscan. But they are still in use across the country. Check the map.

The issue is RELATED to suppression and cheating tactics--you know, election rigging is a multi-pronged strategy--helped out by the Dem party as well-- as you illustrate.

PLEASE--just READ the Harpers article--that is ALL I ask.

--And then, after that I would suggest Bradblog and the DU Election Reform forum--but the Harpers article gives it to you in a nutshell.

marions ghost

(19,841 posts)
18. Suggest to buy it and read it on or after election day...
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 09:36 AM
Oct 2012

when you have more time. It might come in handy if we have any more FL or OH scenarios then. Be prepared.

TheKentuckian

(25,029 posts)
19. How do you ignore the root of the issue...proof is not possible?
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 09:56 AM
Oct 2012

Not unless someone in on the game rolls and even then there will be excuses to protect the system.

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
33. Did you have any points to make or are you just showing how shitty you can be when you disagree?
Thu Oct 25, 2012, 09:05 AM
Oct 2012

That was rhetorical.

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
23. How would you explain
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 03:11 PM
Oct 2012

the anecdotal posts right here on DU since early voting began that are saying they saw their votes changed?

 

reusrename

(1,716 posts)
24. It doesn't matter if you agree with them or not, they are factually incorrect.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 08:09 PM
Oct 2012

And that's really the point, isn't it?

And, the liars at Think Progress not only know that they are lying, they don't care.

Do you even understand what they are lying about?

They accuse Brad Blog of making a certain claim, a certain claim that Brad Blog has, in fact, never made. And they KNOW that Brad Blog has never made such a claim.

When any member of the press projects an opinion onto another member of the press, an opinion that is false, an opinion that the other person has never claimed to hold, in fact, an opinion that the other member has specifically denied holding, then that is always a very nasty bit of business.

This is bad, very bad. Evil, I would say. I stand firmly with Brad Blog in their fight against evil.

marions ghost

(19,841 posts)
14. Oh great
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 09:00 AM
Oct 2012

Well I guess Brad Friedman is used to that treatment. He's been dealing with The Elephant in the Room for a long time--since 2000 at least. He's well-respected and his work is solid.

Brad

Yeah --even progressives DON'T want to acknowledge that we are "working against ourselves" --if we don't address the myriad ways that our election process is compromised.

Our system is severely compromised --and increasingly, under Republican control.

flamingdem

(39,331 posts)
26. Maybe this is good, if a back and forth would occur maybe this would get
Thu Oct 25, 2012, 01:02 AM
Oct 2012

addressed? We have to be able to look into it and not be called conspiracy theorists, that's a cheap shot. If it's not an issue then lay out exact technical proof and guarantees.

Overseas

(12,121 posts)
36. It's one thing to say Now Is Not The Time, but another to dismiss evidence. Did our Democratic
Thu Oct 25, 2012, 09:42 AM
Oct 2012

legislators try to introduce bills to return to paper ballots? They could have tried and been filibustered.

If not, let's hope we get a Democratic majority again that will eliminate unverifiable electronic voting with machines with proprietary code owned by private companies who have declared allegiance to the Republican Party.

Now is not the time.

But January 2009 was the time.

And January 2013 will be the time again.


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'Think Progress' Smears B...