General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsShade or no shade? Leader SCHUMER on The View said & repeated Robt BYRD was MANCHIN's mentor
He went out of his way not to pin-the-blame-on him alone when the hosts listed all the agenda items not delivered so far, obliquely saying that in a 50 votes scenario any one senator can make things harder. But on two issues - voting rights and changing the filibuster - he found it noteworthy to mention that BYRD was MANCHIN's "predecessor and mentor," especially "mentor," and that Senator BYRD had "changed the rules" some seven times "when circumstances called for it."
*** Now, to us Dems Senator BYRD was a prominent Dem, but wingnuts have been hashing him out as having been, like a hundred years ago, a KKK member, with their customary ignorance of historical changes (LINCOLN & T. ROOSEVELT wouldn't recognize today's Repuke party).
So, to me, Leader SCHUMER went out of his way to link MANCHIN to BYRD. These days, the first thought at the mention of BYRD is the wingnut trope.
*** ON EDIT, on the "no shade" side, perhaps holding Mentor BYRD out as an exemplar for being pragmatic for gentle schooling of MANCHIN?
former9thward
(32,082 posts)Byrd voted against both African American nominees to the Supreme Court. Thurgood Marshall and Clarence Thomas. Marshall and Thomas are pretty opposite in terms of ideology so what was the reason for his vote against Marshall?
In 2001 he used the N word in a national broadcast interview. He apologized but when that word is so close to you that you use it in a national broadcast what does that mean?
Sen. Byrd Apologizes for Racial Epithet
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=121733
UTUSN
(70,741 posts)angle.
JohnSJ
(92,403 posts)UTUSN
(70,741 posts)And the link came up with both the filibuster and voting rights issues.
These days whenever BYRD is mentioned it's by wingnuts. So what is your take on SCHUMER's making the link, twice?
JohnSJ
(92,403 posts)pass the voting rights bill
brush
(53,871 posts)and the filibuster issue. He doesn't have even say it, just linking Manchin with the old racist, filibusterer is enough...and it's also shot over the bow to let Manchin know he can be damaged.
Donkees
(31,454 posts)Schumer's main point concerns Manchin pretending that rules can't change
Quote at about 5 minute mark:
---
Byrd was also known for using his knowledge of parliamentary procedure. Byrd frustrated Republicans with his encyclopedic knowledge of the inner workings of the Senate, particularly prior to the Reagan Revolution. From 1977 to 1979 he was described as "performing a procedural tap dance around the minority, outmaneuvering Republicans with his mastery of the Senate's arcane rules.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Byrd
Were working very hard trying to persuade Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema, Sen. Schumer tells #TheView on voting rights reform. They just say we shouldnt change the Senate rules to do it.