Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe accountability-free world of Tucker Carlson
Link to tweet
Tweet text:
Philip Bump
@pbump
Why does Tucker Carlson make so many unfounded claims without any accountability? Part of it is format. More of it, of course, is indifference.
washingtonpost.com
Analysis | The accountability-free world of Tucker Carlson
It's not just that he is routinely dishonest. It's that he operates in a realm where that doesn't matter.
8:48 AM · Jan 14, 2022
Philip Bump
@pbump
Why does Tucker Carlson make so many unfounded claims without any accountability? Part of it is format. More of it, of course, is indifference.
washingtonpost.com
Analysis | The accountability-free world of Tucker Carlson
It's not just that he is routinely dishonest. It's that he operates in a realm where that doesn't matter.
8:48 AM · Jan 14, 2022
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/01/14/tucker-carlson-accountability/
No paywall
https://archive.fo/LoOFW
Correction: This article originally stated that the square root of 9 is 6. The article has been corrected.
See that correction? Thats not real. At no point did I misstate the square root of 9 in this article. Had I done so though, getting a basic fact like that wrong, such a correction would have been the result, sitting at the top of this article for everyone to read every time they come to this page. Thats how it works for articles on the Web from institutions interested in self-correction. For a writer, its painful, like executing a risky series of tricks on a snowboarding halfpipe only to have your wipeout go viral (to use a far cooler analogy than is warranted). But that is how it works.
This is not how it works on television. There are several important differences between television and writing online. One is impermanence: If you read these words, its easy to come back and read them again if you wish to, whereas, on television, most commentary is transitory. Another is density: I can transmit a lot more information in writing than I can by speaking over the same period of time. (You just read the beginning of this paragraph. Now go back and read it out loud. Which was faster?) A third is constraint: If your show is one hour long, you have one hour. Thats it.
So when something inaccurate is said on television, its much harder to correct. Any on-air correction that isnt a flash in the lower third eats up programming time. In part, thats because you have to give the context for what it is that youre correcting, since its not accompanying the original story. (This is a challenge for corrections in the print newspaper, too, although there we have more space to play with.) And, then, that explanation on TV takes longer than a written one because speaking is slower than reading. Thats a lot of disincentive for on-air corrections and certainly one reason we so infrequently see them.
Thats if you want to correct your mistakes, which Fox News and Tucker Carlson very obviously dont.
*snip*
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 728 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The accountability-free world of Tucker Carlson (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Jan 2022
OP
leftieNanner
(15,124 posts)1. I used to think that advertisers pulling out would chasten him
But then I realized that Fox doesn't really care about advertisers. They get their $7 per month from every cable subscriber in the country. Whether we support them or listen to them or not. I've tried to tell my cable provider that I don't want to pay for Fox. They tell me I don't have a choice.
pandr32
(11,588 posts)2. One day he will be reviled and shunned by all
That is my hope.
He needs to be completely shut out--treated as shit on the sole of a shoe.