General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWingus Dingus
(8,059 posts)Not really interested in stupid performance shit right now.
TheProle
(2,198 posts)Response to alphafemale (Original post)
Post removed
AZSkiffyGeek
(11,070 posts)She's conservative anyhow.
DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)Proof please?
AZSkiffyGeek
(11,070 posts)Why would he have a liberal lawyer working for him?
She blames Biden more than the actual Conservatives who ignored her?
She attacked Democrats at pretty much every turn during the 2020 election?
DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)Your other points are all off point.
Do you know what her areas of expertise are?
Autumn
(45,120 posts)AZSkiffyGeek
(11,070 posts)Great idea!
Autumn
(45,120 posts)Ocelot II
(115,858 posts)You nominate someone who is the most qualified, and preferably young enough to remain on the court for a long time - you don't do it to stick it to the opposition, that's just stupid.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)jmowreader
(50,562 posts)We need someone about 40 to 45 years old.
LenaBaby61
(6,977 posts)ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)Stop with people over 60 just to stick it to the repukes. We need to get someone as young as possible.
FakeNoose
(32,767 posts)But it's a non-starter anyway.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)The President can nominate whomever he wants. However, he is unlikely to nominate someone who was nominated by a former President but not confirmed by the Senate at that time.
Instead, he will nominate someone who is a contemporary figure and young enough to serve for many, many years, and who can be confirmed by the Senate.
He will not make this nomination based on anything other than those things. So, he will not nominate Anita Hill.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,438 posts)alphafemale
(18,497 posts)He promised
beaglelover
(3,489 posts)Ocelot II
(115,858 posts)A president shouldn't nominate people for the Supreme Court to make a statement or get revenge. You nominate the best, most qualified person. Anita Hill has never been a judge, among other things..
Stinky The Clown
(67,819 posts). . . . come on. Really . . . . . ?
I get the poetic justice but not now.
UTUSN
(70,744 posts)be forced to be periodically examined for missing items down there?!1
Or, would Ginni leave harassing messages with the SCotUS clerical pool?!1
Response to alphafemale (Original post)
Post removed