Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'Don't Kick!': Video Shows MAGA Election Clerk Freaking Out During Arrest

https://www.thedailybeast.com/tina-peters-maga-election-clerk-appears-to-try-kicking-police-officer-during-arrest

The notorious pro-Trump Mesa County elections clerk Tina Peters was detained at a bagel shop on Tuesdayand a video of the incident shows her resisting arrest and apparently attempting to kick a cop. Peters became one of Colorados most renowned elections officials last year after she was accused of aiding a QAnon-linked leak of voting-machine logins.
The Denver Post reported that Tuesdays arrest wasnt linked to investigations of that possible election-security breach, but was related to Peters allegedly filming court proceedings on her iPad. Investigators were reportedly looking for that iPad when they detained Peters.
In a video shared by 9News, Peters can be seen jostling with a cop and yelling Let go of me! She appears to attempt to kick an officer, who shouts: Dont kick! Peters legal defense fund said she complied by handing over the iPad, but resisted when officers started trying to seize other items.
Read it at The Denver Post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

'Don't Kick!': Video Shows MAGA Election Clerk Freaking Out During Arrest (Original Post)
Celerity
Feb 2022
OP
stopdiggin
(14,042 posts)1. the judge made specific warnings
about filming or recording court proceedings - then challenged Peters when it appeared she was doing so. And, as Clerk/Recorder, Peters should have been perfectly aware of such requirements in any case.
- Denver Post - On Feb. 7, Peters allegedly appeared to be using an iPad to record a court hearing in Deputy Clerk Belinda Knisleys criminal case and then told the judge in the case that she was not recording it, the search warrant stated. The judge had told members of the audience that he would take action if he found out someone was recording the hearing.
During a status hearing for Knisleys case, a deputy DA and paralegal said they heard Peters claim in court that she wasnt recording and that those who accused of her of such were not being truthful, but that they saw Peters using the iPad to record, or attempt to record and then stopping it when she was discovered, according to the warrant.
If the evidence shows Peters did record and lied to the judge, she could be charged with attempting to influence a public servant, a felony.
A spokesperson for Peters legal defense fund said the legal team is assessing its options after Tuesdays arrest.
The search warrant presented listed exactly one item, an iPad with a white case, Rory McShane said in an email. Clerk Peters complied with that, then officers began attempting to take other items of personal property, not listed in the warrant including her car keys, which is illegal.
If the evidence shows Peters did record and lied to the judge, she could be charged with attempting to influence a public servant, a felony.
A spokesperson for Peters legal defense fund said the legal team is assessing its options after Tuesdays arrest.
The search warrant presented listed exactly one item, an iPad with a white case, Rory McShane said in an email. Clerk Peters complied with that, then officers began attempting to take other items of personal property, not listed in the warrant including her car keys, which is illegal.
If LE 'incidentally' run across evidence of illegal activity or intent during legitimate search, that is clearly covered - but I would like to know what 'other items' (including car keys?) they were attempting to remove/seize? Or is that part of the story just a plain fabrication?