Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy Rudy Giuliani's condemnation of the Jan. 6 committee matters
Rudy will never really cooperate with the Jan. 6 Select committee
Link to tweet
For congressional investigators examining the Jan. 6 attack, there are few figures more important than Rudy Giuliani. He was not only a central figure in Donald Trumps inner circle as the then-president tried to overturn his election defeat, and he not only spoke at the rally that preceded the riot, but the former New York City mayor stands accused of helping coordinate the fake-electors scheme thats the subject of multiple ongoing investigations.....
Giuliani appeared on conservative media outlet called Newsmax last night, and shared an unhelpful perspective on the bipartisan panel:
First, the committee is perfectly legal, and its legitimacy has been endorsed by federal courts.
Second, it does have minority membership. It doesnt need Republican members to exist and function, but it has Republican members anyway.
Third, the House committee obviously has the authority to issue subpoenas, and as a rule, persons of interest dont have the luxury of deciding whether to comply with subpoenas based on whether or not they approve of those whove issued the legal directives.
Giuliani appeared on conservative media outlet called Newsmax last night, and shared an unhelpful perspective on the bipartisan panel:
How can you have any confidence in this committee, which, by the way, is illegal, and doesnt have a minority membership, and really cant subpoena anybody?
First, the committee is perfectly legal, and its legitimacy has been endorsed by federal courts.
Second, it does have minority membership. It doesnt need Republican members to exist and function, but it has Republican members anyway.
Third, the House committee obviously has the authority to issue subpoenas, and as a rule, persons of interest dont have the luxury of deciding whether to comply with subpoenas based on whether or not they approve of those whove issued the legal directives.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 745 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Rudy Giuliani's condemnation of the Jan. 6 committee matters (Original Post)
LetMyPeopleVote
Feb 2022
OP
See, that's the thing. Those blatant lies pass for legitimate truths on Faux Snooze
Ferrets are Cool
Feb 2022
#2
He's trying to remain relevant. But, I guess the dripping hair coloring, his gutter mouth,
SWBTATTReg
Feb 2022
#3
Me.
(35,454 posts)1. Who Didn't See That Coming?
Ferrets are Cool
(21,107 posts)2. See, that's the thing. Those blatant lies pass for legitimate truths on Faux Snooze
otherwise known today as PPN. Putin's Pawn Network.
SWBTATTReg
(22,133 posts)3. He's trying to remain relevant. But, I guess the dripping hair coloring, his gutter mouth,
his holding a press conference in the parking lot of a lawn care company (? I think). And losing his lawyer certifications doesn't help.
He's over the hill, riff raff on the winds, a worthless toady.