Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,201 posts)
Wed Feb 16, 2022, 09:47 PM Feb 2022

NY attorney general fires back at Trump's defense of financial statements

(Reuters) - New York's attorney general on Wednesday pounced on former President Donald Trump's defense of company's financial statements, saying the five-page statement Trump issued a day earlier contradicted a court filing by his attorneys.

"It is not unusual for parties to a legal proceeding to disagree about the facts," the attorney general's office wrote in a letter filed in New York state court. "But it is truly rare for a party to publicly disagree with statements submitted by his own attorneys in a signed pleading -- let alone one day after the pleading was filed."

Attorney General Letitia James is conducting a probe into whether the Trumps inflated real estate values to obtain bank loans, and reduced values to lower tax bills.

Trump's attorneys repeatedly stated that he did not know enough to respond to allegations of inaccurate valuations. But the former president's five-page statement got into detail about possible discrepancies, implying that he had more knowledge than his lawyers said.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/ny-attorney-general-fires-back-222452182.html

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NY attorney general fires back at Trump's defense of financial statements (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Feb 2022 OP
I wonder if his lawyers recommended this? OAITW r.2.0 Feb 2022 #1
This would be good cause for the lawyers to quit representing 45 Sanity Claws Feb 2022 #2
He is a boob extextraordinaire. BigmanPigman Feb 2022 #3
Rofl Joinfortmill Feb 2022 #8
I'm curious WillUSAF Feb 2022 #4
I keep thinking that Deuxcents Feb 2022 #7
Less retorting more indicting please. n/t PoliticAverse Feb 2022 #5
"Trump's attorneys repeatedly stated that he did not know enough to respond .... Botany Feb 2022 #6
Ms. James is really after The Dotard and his family. argyl Feb 2022 #9
And this BS about him being too stupid to know what was being done in his name is just that. argyl Feb 2022 #10

OAITW r.2.0

(24,610 posts)
1. I wonder if his lawyers recommended this?
Wed Feb 16, 2022, 09:53 PM
Feb 2022

I'm betting the political brain-trust hatched this response without understanding the legal implications.

Sanity Claws

(21,852 posts)
2. This would be good cause for the lawyers to quit representing 45
Wed Feb 16, 2022, 09:54 PM
Feb 2022

It is clear to the attorneys that he is lying to them and that they are unable to sign court filings in good faith.

 

WillUSAF

(91 posts)
4. I'm curious
Wed Feb 16, 2022, 10:02 PM
Feb 2022

after his long public history with the way he treats lawyers, who would in their right mind would take him on as a client??

Botany

(70,584 posts)
6. "Trump's attorneys repeatedly stated that he did not know enough to respond ....
Wed Feb 16, 2022, 10:06 PM
Feb 2022

.... to allegations of inaccurate valuations."


But officer I just didn't know enough about bank robbery to know that robbing that bank was wrong.

Keep talking FG just keep talking.

argyl

(3,064 posts)
9. Ms. James is really after The Dotard and his family.
Thu Feb 17, 2022, 12:51 AM
Feb 2022

And as the AG of the state where he did most of his dirty business, she was a lot to work with.

And as a state AG no feds can threaten her.

argyl

(3,064 posts)
10. And this BS about him being too stupid to know what was being done in his name is just that.
Thu Feb 17, 2022, 01:03 AM
Feb 2022

I have a Collings guitar that as a personal possession isn't subject to taxation but if it were and I told the IRS that my perfect $5,000 acoustic guitar was only worth $50 for tax purposes they'd be all over my ass.
So you can lie about a 250 million discrepancy and they look the other way but a regular guy like me would feel the full power of the IRS pronto.

And for you guitar aficionados, yep, they're every bit as good(make that superb) as you've heard.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NY attorney general fires...