General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBiden interviews trio of candidates for Supreme Court
WASHINGTON (AP) President Joe Biden has interviewed at least three candidates for the Supreme Court, according to a person familiar with the matter, and the White House reiterated Tuesday that he remains on track to make a final selection by Monday.
White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Biden has not made a decision on whom to nominate. But the president has interviewed judges Ketanji Brown Jackson, J. Michelle Childs and Leondra Kruger, according to a person familiar with the matter. A second person familiar said Biden had interviewed at least three candidates for the post. The people spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the internal process.
Biden has pledged to nominate the first Black woman to the high court by the end of the month to fill the vacancy being created by the retirement of Justice Stephen Breyer. It was not clear whether any additional candidates have been interviewed by the president.
Psaki declined to discuss whether Biden had conducted interviews but insisted the president was on track to make the selection despite rising tensions between Russia and Ukraine.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/biden-interviews-trio-of-candidates-for-supreme-court/ar-AAUb97T?ocid=msedgntp
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Ohio Joe
(21,761 posts)There is no shortage of candidates, so I'd not be surprised if there were more interviews.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)I thought Breyer was staying till the end of the term... Oct sometime... Is it different?
dem4decades
(11,304 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)The Supreme Court term ends effectively usually in June (next term beginning "first Monday in October" .
The new justice can be confirmed before Breyer formally retires.
Ohio Joe
(21,761 posts)Heh, yeah, these are probably the final three then
OAITW r.2.0
(24,631 posts)Thank God Joe is choosing.
mahina
(17,705 posts)And a slime mold.
dweller
(23,665 posts)I mean read a slip of paper from Federalist fukheads directing him to anoint some sycophant but yeh, same thing
✌🏻
DemocraticPatriot
(4,414 posts)from South Carolina, whichever that is, I forget the name...
but the fact that Lindsey Graham would support her is not a plus. I earlier read reports about some of her decisions which were rather un-progressive, which would explain the prior sentence.
If we can approve a justice with no Republican votes, so be it.
Ohio Joe
(21,761 posts)From near the end of the article:
"More to the point, Republicans are unable to stop Bidens pick in the 50-50 Senate where Democrats have the majority with Vice President Kamala Harris tie-breaking vote. They want to allow the confirmation process to unfold without self-inflicted political drama so they can resume challenging the president on their preferred topics of the economy and the administrations handling of COVID-19.
Republicans believe one way to show voters how they would govern is by drawing a contrast between this court battle and the controversy that exploded around Justice Brett Kavanaughs confirmation, when the Trump nominee was accused of sexual assault, a claim he denied. Republicans believe Senate Democrats suffered with voters after those highly politicized public confirmation hearings."
_________________________________________________________________
They know they cannot stop the Presidents pick so it looks like they are going to try and spin it like they are all fora black woman supreme court justice.
DemocraticPatriot
(4,414 posts)possibility.
Of course the nominee will replace a leftish justice, so the GQP have nothing to lose here.