General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAlexander S. Vindman tweets
Live metrics show that Twitter has been restricted on multiple providers in #Russia as of 9:00 a.m. UTC
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Irish_Dem
(47,131 posts)Putin is looking like a fool.
smb
(3,473 posts)...and covered it up so that the shortages weren't obvious until now.
Irish_Dem
(47,131 posts)L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)Irish_Dem
(47,131 posts)Either way they are incompetent.
Evolve Dammit
(16,743 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,209 posts).
Russians thought their navy was badass and the Japanese Fleet sunk them in an hour or two.
The Battle of Tsushima (Japanese:対馬沖海戦, Tsushimaoki-Kaisen, Russian: Цусимское сражение, Tsusimskoye srazheniye), also known as the Battle of Tsushima Strait and the Naval Battle of Sea of Japan (Japanese: 日本海海戦, Nihonkai-Kaisen) in Japan, was a major naval battle fought between Russia and Japan during the Russo-Japanese War. It was naval history's first, decisive sea battle fought by modern steel battleship fleets,[2][3] and the first naval battle in which wireless telegraphy (radio) played a critically important role. It has been characterized as the "dying echo of the old era for the last time in the history of naval warfare, ships of the line of a beaten fleet surrendered on the high seas".[4]
It was fought on 2728 May 1905 (1415 May in the Julian calendar then in use in Russia) in the Tsushima Strait located between Korea and southern Japan. In this battle the Japanese fleet under Admiral Tōgō Heihachirō destroyed the Russian fleet, under Admiral Zinovy Rozhestvensky, which had traveled over 18,000 nautical miles (33,000 km) to reach the Far East. In London in 1906, Sir George Sydenham Clarke wrote, "The battle of Tsu-shima is by far the greatest and the most important naval event since Trafalgar";[5] decades later, historian Edmund Morris agreed with this judgment.[6] The destruction of the fleet caused a bitter reaction from the Russian public, which induced a peace treaty in September 1905 without any further battles.
Prior to the Russo-Japanese War, countries constructed their battleships with mixed batteries of mainly 6-inch (152 mm), 8-inch (203 mm), 10-inch (254 mm) and 12-inch (305 mm) guns, with the intent that these battleships fight on the battle line in a close-quarter, decisive fleet action. The Battle of Tsushima conclusively demonstrated that battleship speed and big guns[7] with longer ranges were more advantageous in naval battles than mixed batteries of different sizes.[8]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tsushima
.
crickets
(25,981 posts)L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)msongs
(67,420 posts)the whole offensive would bog down.
mitch96
(13,912 posts)11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)See: Bulge, Battle of.
Irish_Dem
(47,131 posts)As Hitler found out.
bigtree
(85,998 posts)We, the sole superpower, sit this one out. Is it deafutism or fatalism? Do our adversary conclude weve lost our nerve?
Link to tweet
...but, yeah, some setbacks for the Russians. They need supply chains to fuel their tanks.
sop
(10,193 posts)logistical support, smuggling in all manner of sophisticated weaponry to take out tanks and aircraft, and teaching the resistance fighters the black arts of asymmetric warfare.
mitch96
(13,912 posts)doing to stir the shit and impede russia's plan...
m
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)and the RU plans and movements were no secret. Ukraine had time to prepare for this. And they have weapons to take out tanks with a single, shoulder-fired weapon.
mitch96
(13,912 posts)doing to stir the shit and impede russia's plan...
m
Quixote1818
(28,946 posts)Justice matters.
(6,933 posts)L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)bigtree
(85,998 posts)...I wonder if he repeated this to the former republicans?
"Like every administration since the end of the Cold War, Joe Bidens fell victim to wishful thinking about the Kremlins ambitions in Ukraine and Russian President Vladimir Putins basic commitment to international norms."
...the Biden administration continued the decades-long practice of allowing deterrence to erode. The paths to prevention were not taken.
For instance, early in December, President Biden openly acknowledged that he would not send American troops to fight in Ukraine, thus removing any possibility of strategic ambiguity."
-- Alexander Vindman
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/02/ukraine-russia-war-nato-biden-deterrence/622873/
Vindman wrote an article to criticize Pres. Biden for not playing rope-a-dope with Putin over U.S. troops on the ground in Ukraine. That's basically it. He's dead wrong on the military assistance to Ukraine. It was Trump who held it up and Vindman's said as much.
President Joe Biden has authorized the State Department to send another $350 million in weapons, including Javelin anti-tank weapons, to help Ukrainian forces fight back the ongoing Russian invasion.
With Ukraine struggling to repel Russias tanks, bombers, helicopters and missiles, the new tranche would supply Ukrainian forces with anti-armor and anti-aircraft systems, ammunition for firearms and body armor, according to the State Department.
This marks the third time Biden has used his presidential drawdown authority to send emergency security assistance from U.S. stockpiles to Ukraine, and it brings the total commitment of U.S. security assistance to $1 billion for this year.
https://www.armytimes.com/pentagon/2022/02/26/biden-to-send-350m-in-military-aid-to-ukraine/
I wish he'd just stfu about what Pres. Biden has done, will do, or should do. He's not in the government anymore, and doesn't know what the president is working on or intends to do.
calimary
(81,322 posts)Good stuff!
#StandwithUkraine
lame54
(35,294 posts)crickets
(25,981 posts)halfulglas
(1,654 posts)so much in the last few years, they've neglected their infantry and haven't kept up with their drills and other maneuvers to keep them sharp and ready. (I've just watched so much of this in the last 4 days it's hard to keep straight where this old lady heard this.) I do know I just watched Seth Moulton talk about how hard it's going to go for them to take the cities now that they've gotten bogged down. With them not knowing what upper floor windows are hiding snipers and people dropping homemade bombs, etc.
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)scipan
(2,351 posts)Is this what you wanted,
Russian government?
To help us so strongly?
To not let us fall?
Is this how you see this,
Russian government?
The screams of our children-
is this your passion?
The tears of our relatives
escaping from apartments
from our houses
which are full of holes /1
from your bullets, your bombs,
cities in catacombs,
is this what you dreamt of?
Were you ready?
Hear me, all who can hear in Russia,
I am writing in Russian
from my native Ukraine
I have not been forbidden /2
What have you imagined,
what are they feeding you,
how did they brainwash you
while they are feeding us bullets,
fear, deaths,
Is this what you call saving us?
Take a look for yourselves,
with your own eyes, think with your own minds, /3
I know there are kind people in Russia,
they will not let something like this slide
Shout about this,
I beg you, do not be silent,
while our children shout
from explosions, understand
at least the words-
your truth
your bravery from now on
we need you so much
Ukraine needs you /4
Is this what you wanted,
Russian government?
To save Ukraine, and you came here to kill?
A mother waits for her son,
a wife waits for her spouse,
how can it be that after all these years we cannot understand each other? /5
Here is the truth
Spread it
the whole world hangs on a very thin thread
while your soldiers are striking our houses
I beg you do not be silent
This is war
do not let the whole country fall into ruins /6
Kyiv is burning while Kyiv-Capital speaks,
but in the 21st century there is no enemy with whom one cannot negotiate,
isn't that true?
and with all these thoughts,
dying from inside
I am shouting "No to war!"
Repeat it with me.
People are shouting: GLORY TO UKRAINE!
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1497630437828710406.html