Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

doc03

(35,389 posts)
Wed Mar 2, 2022, 10:31 AM Mar 2022

What will we do when there is a confrontation between

Russia and NATO and it will happen? Do we roll the dice and take a chance on a nuclear war? This by far the biggest crises we have ever faced. Back in the Cuban
missile crises Kruschov was not nuts, Putin is nuts. All we can hope is someone refuses his orders.

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Response to doc03 (Original post)

doc03

(35,389 posts)
2. Their problem is our problem. Can they? We better hope.
Wed Mar 2, 2022, 10:35 AM
Mar 2022

The line has been drawn, it's back away or suicide.

Response to doc03 (Reply #2)

Ligyron

(7,639 posts)
3. I would not be surprised if one of his inner circle offed Putin.
Wed Mar 2, 2022, 10:41 AM
Mar 2022

They know what is at stake as well as we.

hamsterjill

(15,224 posts)
6. I hope your assessment is correct.
Wed Mar 2, 2022, 10:48 AM
Mar 2022

But I have no confidence that Russians will handle the Putin problem.

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,664 posts)
4. Hope that there's another Vasili Arkhipov or Stanislav Petrov
Wed Mar 2, 2022, 10:43 AM
Mar 2022
The Man Who Saved the World

The Man Who Saved the World, premiering Tuesday, October 23 at 9 pm ET on PBS (check local listings), tells the unsung story of Soviet naval officer Vasili Arkhipov, the Brigade Chief of Staff on submarine B-59, who refused to fire a nuclear missile and saved the world from World War III and nuclear disaster.

Vasily Arkhipov



Василий Александрович Архипов

Born: 30 January 1926; Zvorkovo, Moscow Oblast, Russian SFSR, Soviet Union
Died: 19 August 1998 (aged 72); Zheleznodorozhny, Moscow Oblast, Russia

Vasili Aleksandrovich Arkhipov (Russian: Василий Александрович Архипов, IPA: [vɐˈsʲilʲɪj ɐlʲɪkˈsandrəvʲɪtɕ arˈxʲipəf], 30 January 1926 – 19 August 1998) was a Soviet Navy officer credited with preventing a Soviet nuclear strike (and, potentially, all-out nuclear war) during the Cuban Missile Crisis. Such an attack likely would have caused a major global thermonuclear response.

As flotilla chief of staff and second-in-command of the diesel powered submarine B-59, Arkhipov refused to authorize the captain's use of nuclear torpedoes against the United States Navy, a decision requiring the agreement of all three senior officers aboard.

In 2002, Thomas Blanton, who was then director of the U.S. National Security Archive, said that Arkhipov "saved the world".

{snip}

Stanislav Petrov



Petrov at his house in 2016

Born: Stanislav Yevgrafovich Petrov; 7 September 1939
Vladivostok, Russian SFSR, Soviet Union; Died: 19 May 2017 (aged 77); Fryazino, Russia

Stanislav Yevgrafovich Petrov (Russian: Станисла́в Евгра́фович Петро́в; 7 September 1939 – 19 May 2017) was a lieutenant colonel of the Soviet Air Defence Forces who played a key role in the 1983 Soviet nuclear false alarm incident. On 26 September 1983, three weeks after the Soviet military had shot down Korean Air Lines Flight 007, Petrov was the duty officer at the command center for the Oko nuclear early-warning system when the system reported that a missile had been launched from the United States, followed by up to five more. Petrov judged the reports to be a false alarm, and his decision to disobey orders, against Soviet military protocol, is credited with having prevented an erroneous retaliatory nuclear attack on the United States and its NATO allies that could have resulted in a large-scale nuclear war which could have wiped out half of the population of the countries involved. An investigation later confirmed that the Soviet satellite warning system had indeed malfunctioned. Because of his decision not to launch a retaliatory nuclear strike amid this incident, Petrov is often credited as having "saved the world".

{snip}

HariSeldon

(457 posts)
5. I hope Russia's top generals can follow the logic
Wed Mar 2, 2022, 10:46 AM
Mar 2022

* Any general who gives the order to deploy nuclear weapons signs his own death warrant via NATO retaliation -- or at least that of the majority of his country.
* On the other hand, if Putin gives the order and the general shoots or otherwise kills (hand-to-hand) Putin, he will be regarded by the world as a hero for preventing nuclear war.
* Even if the attempt to kill Putin fails, the personal consequences are no worse than acceeding to the order.

I suppose Putin might have developed leverage over the people reporting to him, but we are looking at him madly jumping on one end of a see-saw with nearly the entire world population on the other side...there isn't enough leverage in the world.

Happy Hoosier

(7,424 posts)
8. If Russia is allowed to take what it wants by simply rattling the nuclear sabre...
Wed Mar 2, 2022, 11:05 AM
Mar 2022

then get used to a world dominated by Putin and his toadies.

I don't savor a direct confrontation with Putin, but at some point he and his generals have to know that they risk as much as we do. Right now, he's kinda winning that game. We are more afraid of him, than he is of us, apparently.

FakeNoose

(32,823 posts)
9. Exactly - and it's also true of North Korea
Wed Mar 2, 2022, 11:11 AM
Mar 2022

Insane despots cannot be allowed to put their hands on nuclear missiles.

Hav

(5,969 posts)
16. Yes, some here argue that those who don't
Wed Mar 2, 2022, 05:11 PM
Mar 2022

want to appease Putin want to cause WW3. That's nonsense and an attempt to downplay Russia's aggression. Putin has to know that Nato takes attacks against its members seriously. Otherwise he'll just go on.

Putin is the one who can stop this at any time. He's the only aggressor here, Nato only reacts to what he does.

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
10. I don't think anyone understands the immediacy of this confrontation.
Wed Mar 2, 2022, 11:14 AM
Mar 2022

This spring (really any day in the next 1-3 months), Russia is going to accuse the West (including the US) of waging an economic war against his country. He's also going to say that Russia is going to fight back with the only weapons they have against such an attack. His people will be starving, and the only media they'll be able to consume will be Russian state media.

Shortly afterwards, the sanctions will collapse. He'll directly threaten to attack everyone, which he's more than capable of doing. None of this 'putting strategic rocket forces on alert' stuff. He'll actually distribute and deploy missiles, and give us a timeline for his demands. He may even identify cities or countries, like Naples, Krakow, Lisbon or Nice. Not a capital city, but a major city in countries that have imposed sanctions. I'd guess he's unlikely to directly threaten the US. One of those countries is going to say 'fuck this, i'm out' and remove sanctions, and that'll be the first domino until all the sanctions are removed.

Then the Cold War 2.0 will be on and in full swing.

Happy Hoosier

(7,424 posts)
11. Exactly what Putin is relying upon.
Wed Mar 2, 2022, 11:20 AM
Mar 2022

And it's why I don't think we can afford to let this transition to the "Fait Accompli" phase where people are just resigned to the loss. Aftr all it's not THAT bad right?

If we allow this domino to fall it will be remembered as a generational mistake. Neville Chamberlain in 2022. So long as we are more afraid of confrontation that he is, he will win. Unless by some miracle he is deposed. I'm not holding my breath for that.

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
12. Putin is not going to let his country collapse.
Wed Mar 2, 2022, 11:29 AM
Mar 2022

His people will be starving. By next month, there is going to be widespread hunger in Russia. They will have no money, no communications, and no hope. Putin and his cronies will be eating just fine. His strategic rocket forces and their families will also be eating just fine.

Biden has to give Putin an off ramp. Putin's gamble is that he'll be in control on Ukraine, with a government established before he has to have this discussion with NATO and the US. The fake puppet Ukraine government will be all like "things are great, and we're happy to be a part of the new Soviet Union."

Putin's position will be:
1. everyone in Ukraine is happy blissful Russian citizens.
2. you're waging an economic war against us
3. you've stolen a bunch of our cash from our international bank accounts.
4. remove the sanctions and give us our stuff back

or we'll start a war everyone will regret for all time. We'll have to decide if this is the hill we're willing to risk extinction for.

Happy Hoosier

(7,424 posts)
13. But what kind of off-ramp?
Wed Mar 2, 2022, 12:17 PM
Mar 2022

The leaked Russian "victory dance" news story shows us where this heading: A new Cold War. If we allow that to happen not only will Joe Biden (or ANY Democrat) be toast for the next cycle or two (with the disaster that entails), but we'll be facing a massive in global power and influence and decades of MORE Cold War expenditures... provided a Trumpite President doesn't just decide to join the axis of evil.

Make no mistake, WAY more than Ukraine is at stake here. WAY more.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What will we do when ther...