General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNATO Countries Pour Weapons Into Ukraine
BRUSSELS The Dutch are sending rocket launchers for air defense. The Estonians are sending Javelin antitank missiles. The Poles and the Latvians are sending Stinger surface-to-air missiles. The Czechs are sending machine guns, sniper rifles, pistols and ammunition.
Even formerly neutral countries like Sweden and Finland are sending weapons. And Germany, long allergic to sending weapons into conflict zones, is sending Stingers as well as other shoulder-launched rockets.
In all, about 20 countries most members of NATO and the European Union, but not all are funneling arms into Ukraine to fight off Russian invaders and arm an insurgency, if the war comes to that.
At the same time, NATO is moving military equipment and as many as 22,000 more troops into member states bordering Russia and Belarus, to reassure them and enhance deterrence.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/nato-countries-pour-weapons-into-ukraine-risking-conflict-with-russia/ar-AAUvGGN
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)FakeNoose
(32,596 posts)They are smaller and more vulnerable than Poland. That's why Putin must be stopped now before he gets any more ideas about escalating this stupid aggression. The Baltic countries are now allied with NATO but they were formerly in the USSR, same as Poland. Putin hated to let them go and I'm sure he wants them back.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)I hope NATO is fortifying those countries!
CaptainTruth
(6,576 posts)Who has given what to help Ukraine?
This article details aid given to Ukraine before and during the invasion of the country by Russian forces.
The table is constantly being updated, if something isnt here itll be added soon.
[link:https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/who-has-given-what-to-help-ukraine/|]
About the UK Defence Journal:
Here at the UK Defence Journal we are dedicated to providing impartial and complete coverage of defence matters in the United Kingdom and around the world.
We are a team of people based around the UK and overseas, were not paid or funded by anyone. The website is written by ordinary people in their free time.
Were not a company and were not a business, were a loose association of writers putting work into the website as and when we have the time to do so. As a group, the UK Defence Journal has no affiliation to any party or political group, our members are drawn from across the political spectrum.
If you would like to know more about who writes for us, then please have a look at our team by clicking here. [link:https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/our-team/|]
peggysue2
(10,823 posts)The deal that Ukrainian pilots would be provided with additional airplanes collapsed for some reason.
That must have been a blow in a lot of quarters. Having more control in the sky is an important element for survival, especially with the stepped-up shelling.
Happy Hoosier
(7,221 posts)Dunno. I hope they get it sorted. If Ukraine loses the ability to at least contest the air, things get a lot grimmer.
peggysue2
(10,823 posts)I agree. Those additional planes could prove crucial in this battle. From what I read, it was Slovakia and Poland who put on the brakes. I didn't see any explanation but wondered if they're unwilling to part with the aircraft bc they're worried about their own security. Putin is unpredictable at this point, so the hostilities could easily spread.
But that's just me speculating. The photos this morning from Kharkiv were horrifying, a prelude to what Putin's prepared to do to Kyiv.
I hope they ultimately get those planes.
Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)Happy Hoosier
(7,221 posts)The Russians are digging in for sieges. A couple of smaller, but impactful raids would be helpful about now.