Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

femmedem

(8,201 posts)
Thu Mar 3, 2022, 07:55 PM Mar 2022

WaPo op-ed: Seize, don't just freeze, Putin's Billions

"In response to the aggression against Ukraine, the United States, the European Union and democratic states across the globe (even banker-friendly Switzerland) have frozen the assets of Russian President Vladimir Putin and his oligarchic cronies. This has clearly failed to halt the onslaught. The question is what to do now.

The answer is, it is time to seize the frozen assets and use them to support humanitarian aid in Ukraine and the more than 1 million Ukrainians forced to flee as refugees. If and when Ukraine is freed from Russian occupation, any remaining funds can be used to help rebuild the country. In the meantime, the seizure would relieve the European taxpayers who will pay to support the refugees and punish the responsible aggressors.

The sums involved are potentially enormous. Various economists have estimated Putin’s wealth between $100 billion and $200 billion — largely held in offshore accounts and properties outside of Russia, and therefore potentially subject to seizure..."

SNIP

"... The Magnitsky Act authorizes the U.S. government to freeze the assets of any foreigners, anywhere in the world, accused of human rights violations under international law. Canada, which has a similar Magnitsky Act, is considering a further step: A bill (S-217) before the Canadian Parliament would authorize Canadian courts to confiscate the frozen assets and redistribute them to address humanitarian needs of people displaced by the violations. In Europe, where the E.U. provides a legal basis for freezing assets of those who violate human rights, member states have taken individual action: In 2017, a Spanish judge ordered the seizure of properties owned by an uncle of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in a money-laundering case..."

More: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/03/03/seize-dont-just-freeze-putins-billions/

About the authors: Michael Doyle is a professor at Columbia University and senior fellow of the Carnegie Council, where he directs its refugee and migration project. Dorothea Koehn is a master’s of international affairs candidate at Columbia and a research fellow at the Carnegie Council. Janine Prantl is a postgraduate legal fellow for the Global Strategic Litigation Council for Refugee Rights.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WaPo op-ed: Seize, don't just freeze, Putin's Billions (Original Post) femmedem Mar 2022 OP
Yes. Put it all in a Rebuild Ukraine Fund. C_U_L8R Mar 2022 #1
Yes! SheltieLover Mar 2022 #2
Yes! Putin doesn't care that his or the oligarchs assets are frozen. Tadpole Raisin Mar 2022 #3
The Russian orchestra conductor Gergiev, who supports Putin and has lost all fierywoman Mar 2022 #4
I sgree seize it. I_UndergroundPanther Mar 2022 #5

Tadpole Raisin

(972 posts)
3. Yes! Putin doesn't care that his or the oligarchs assets are frozen.
Thu Mar 3, 2022, 08:03 PM
Mar 2022

He is the unofficial richest man in the world. He knows sooner or later he’ll get them back. But seize them forever and use them to help Ukraine.

Lovely!!!

fierywoman

(7,683 posts)
4. The Russian orchestra conductor Gergiev, who supports Putin and has lost all
Thu Mar 3, 2022, 08:26 PM
Mar 2022

his western work, apparently has $150,000,000 of properties in Italy alone.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WaPo op-ed: Seize, don't ...