Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,683 posts)
Thu Mar 3, 2022, 08:08 PM Mar 2022

GOP foreign policy gurus can't have it both ways

GOP foreign policy gurus can’t have it both ways

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/03/02/republicans-trump-ukraine-hypocrisy/?utm_source=reddit.com

By Jennifer Rubin, Columnist at the Washington Post

Yesterday at 11:00 a.m. EST

"SNIP.......

A parade of GOP lawmakers has attempted the impossible: to clamber onto the pro-Ukraine, pro-democracy bandwagon without repudiating Russia’s favorite enabler and ongoing PR helper, former president Donald Trump. The majority of Republicans — from Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) to Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) to House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) — have twisted themselves into pretzels. They denigrate President Biden for weakness (despite orchestrating the most robust sanctions in history) while refusing to acknowledge Trump’s role (and thereby their own complicity) in enabling Putin, sowing dissension in NATO and undermining Ukraine. (Certainly, Senate Republicans must recall acquitting Trump for extorting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky by threatening to withhold vital military aid.)

The same conundrum afflicts a segment of Republican foreign policy pundits who heretofore have not broken with Trump. Take the Vandenberg Coalition, a who’s who of GOP national security experts that includes both consistent opponents of Trump and his Putin appeasement, and many who have never spoken an ill word about the former president. (Some even joined the administration.) The coalition put out a tough-minded statement, declaring that “we must reject the moral equivalency that refuses to distinguish between aggressor and victim, and the isolationist arguments that the United States has no interest in resisting aggression in Europe.”

Great! So does that mean they’ve all now broken with Trump and his undermining of NATO, and they would never support Trump for president, let alone serve in a (God forbid) second Trump administration? Well, oddly, it’s not easy to get those who didn’t break with Trump years ago to make that logical, consistent argument.

I asked Vandenberg Coalition Executive Director Carrie Filipetti, who served in the Trump administration in the State Department and at the United Nations, to explain. She did not respond to multiple requests for contact. I contacted 10 members of the advisory board. One said he never saw the statement.

......SNIP"

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GOP foreign policy gurus can't have it both ways (Original Post) applegrove Mar 2022 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Mar 2022 #1
I agree with the author but gawd the parentheses and the hyphens underpants Mar 2022 #2
I'm not a language person so I did not notice. applegrove Mar 2022 #3

Response to applegrove (Original post)

underpants

(182,829 posts)
2. I agree with the author but gawd the parentheses and the hyphens
Thu Mar 3, 2022, 08:23 PM
Mar 2022

There had to be a better way to allude to things.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»GOP foreign policy gurus ...