General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDo you think Putin will venture into a NATO country?
If you think he will, do you think he will do so in the near future before he controls Ukraine or will he wait until Ukraine is under his control?
Ukraine gives Russia a massive western border with NATO.
samnsara
(17,622 posts)2naSalit
(86,647 posts)He's in that "buggy" stage and a bit unpredictable while he's trying to recover from the rude awakening he's having in the form of resistance.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)But, it will not have a good result should he do so.
Duncanpup
(12,860 posts)Articles say he has Parkinsons and hes surrounded by yes men ass kissers. Im 56 and Im more afraid now than as kid growing up in the Cold War.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)Response to Stinky The Clown (Original post)
Joinfortmill This message was self-deleted by its author.
Joinfortmill
(14,432 posts)CrackityJones75
(2,403 posts)If he crosses into nato and we go hell fury he will launch his nukes. I believe he is that crazy. He has already threatened it with his statements.
This is not a good situation and needs to be handled delicately
atreides1
(16,079 posts)It'll likely be the Baltic states. This will provide Russia with open access to Kaliningrad...HQ of the Russian Baltic Fleet!
And if he does attack...Lithuania will be the initial target...it will also test the resolve of both NATO and the EU...
MarineCombatEngineer
(12,399 posts)but with the US, NATO, Europe and the EU so united against Putin, I've no doubt now that we would respond massively.
Submariner
(12,504 posts)and we could shut down GPS satellites and cripple worldwide navigation, including some missile aiming systems, and then hope for the best until someone puts a slug in Putins temple.
In the run up to the Y2K panic, working offshore with GPS NAV crippled, resulted in total chaos for cable and pipe laying ships trying to use ROVs. It could cripple Putins hypersonic missile dreams.
LastDemocratInSC
(3,647 posts)It's possible that Western military agencies could screw it up if needed but there's no certainty about that.
Submariner
(12,504 posts)at least I didn't embarrass myself and suggest we cut off Russia's access to the Loran Alpha and Loran Charlie NAV equipment and signaling I'm more familiar with
Shanti Shanti Shanti
(12,047 posts)Wait 6 months...then we see how far they will go.
NoMoreRepugs
(9,435 posts)what a tragic mistake it would be to take on NATO.
Bev54
(10,053 posts)he will go down in infamy if he secures them. He is fucking crazy.
SoonerPride
(12,286 posts)Next question.
Hav
(5,969 posts)I assume the Ukraine invasion was planned for years. What we got as a result is that the Russian army looks pitiful and has to engage in war crimes for any progress, their economy is effed and the West ramped up their awareness and (partially) defense spending. Much of Russia's equipment is stranded all over Ukraine.
Putin's dead before Russia seems to be ready for the next major war. On the other side, all bets are off if he's lost it. Obviously, in that case we cannot expect rational decision making.
Happy Hoosier
(7,314 posts)If Ukraine had gone well, hr may have attempted a fait accompli in the Baltic states. They are small and vulnerable. But that is less likely now with his militarys embarrassment in Ukraine.
getagrip_already
(14,764 posts)They are apparently scraping bottom trying to get reinforcements to ukraine. They will need 500,000 to control that country. He doesn't have anywhere close to that now.
Russia isn't equipped to fight two wars at once. Let alone one with NATO. Sure, they go on a war footing and throw every warm body they can point a gun at into a uniform, but that isn't a fighting force on day 1.
But as others have pointed out, these are points of logic and reason. If putin has reached the stage of parkinsons where he is seeing people who aren't there, and hearing things that aren't being said, all bets are off.
The question is how far will the military follow.
Deminpenn
(15,286 posts)if he wanted a war with NATO. Right now a very large part of the Russian military is concentrated in a small area. It would be devasted by NATO airstrikes and missiles. You can bet Russian command and control would be an immediate target, too. There would be tactical electronic warfare aircraft jamming Russian communications as well.
Happy Hoosier
(7,314 posts)We in the west have dubbed in the "Fait Accompli." It is what he did in Crimea attempted in Ukraine. Simply put, it's a Blitzkreig style assault that achieves its military goals very quickly and then pretty much dares the west to do anything about it. It worked in Crimea. It is bogged down in Ukraine as a whole. BUT... it may yet succeed. The West is very risk averse and he is betting the west will eventually accept the seizure of Ukraine as a "fair accompli" and will normalize diplomatic and trade relations. So far, that's not happening, but it could.
There have apparently been thoughts in Russia that they could do the same in the Baltic states. That the Baltic states would fall rapidly and if the Russians rattle the nuclear sabre (sound familiar?) the West might be reluctant to risk nuclear confrontation over the tiny Baltic states.
IMHO, a LOT depends upon the West holding the line against Russia in Ukraine. I would prefer a more aggressive response, but if not, unity on the economic and diplomatic fronts are very, very important.
radius777
(3,635 posts)will occur as long as they illegally occupy Ukraine.
NATO will defend every inch of territory, including the eastern flank (Poland, the Baltics, etc) as Article 5 would be invoked. The NATO rapid response force was recently activated and deployed in the eastern flank.
Putin is well aware that we have many 'forward deployed' nukes aimed right at his head.
Happy Hoosier
(7,314 posts)A few years pass... and that Russian market and Russian oil and gas start to look pretty tempting. And a "he'll never give up Ukraine any, so why not?" type attitude could very well take hold. Maybe not, but that's what he is betting on.
ratchiweenie
(7,754 posts)Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Nevilledog
(51,122 posts)Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)It's sad watching him decimate Ukraine though.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Shermann
(7,423 posts)Invade Ukraine to prevent highly protected NATO status there, just to later attack another highly protected NATO country?
Calista241
(5,586 posts)a conventional invasion of a NATO aligned country. His military is obviously ill trained, corrupt, incompetent and under equipped. Controlling Ukraine does dramatically shorten the length of border he has to defend, so it'll require fewer forces to cover his borders with non-aligned countries.
The US military, and the investment in training of our officers is a HUGE differentiator from the rest of the world. Nearly all of our military leaders have graduated with a bachelors degree from college or a military academy. Our military academies are highly respected institutions, both in the education industry and throughout our society. All flag officer have also graduated with at least one degree from War College, which is equivalent to a Masters Degree or Doctorate.
Our flag officers are all students of the art of waging war and the logistics involved in waging war. NATO countries and our allies make it a point to send their officers to our military academies and take advantage of US provided educational opportunities. This educational system is not really duplicated anywhere else in the world, and is a breathtakingly HUGE advantage for the US and aligned militaries.
Putin's first step will be to get Russia out from under the economic catastrophe that's about to envelope his country.
Sunsky
(1,737 posts)Putin is unhinged and unpredictable. He displays grandiosity and I believe he's in a manic-like state and is not acting with good judgment. He will push the limit. Therefore, he may commit an act against a NATO country then deny that it was Russia and blame Ukraine or NATO itself.
Corgigal
(9,291 posts)he wants lines drawn back to the Warsaw pack. Like for Putin and the good ole days, when he was young and stationed in Germany behind the wall.
This is all about one mans nostalgia. Add madness, isolation and maybe an illness.
Demsrule86
(68,586 posts)will take what he can and threaten those who oppose him with nuclear annihilation which he has hinted at already.
cemaphonic
(4,138 posts)The whole reason he's so desperate to keep Ukraine out of NATO is because it would then be forever out of reach.
Not to mention, with the way the Russian armed forces are performing, NATO forces would thrash them even if the US forces stayed home. Plus, in all likelihood, Ukraine is going to be a hell of an insurgency. Even without taking the economic pain from sanctions into account, they're going to have their hands full trying to subdue Ukraine for a long time.
Sapient Donkey
(1,568 posts)There are analysis from before this all started that pointed out the logistical problems they are bound to have. So, Im thinking if did attempt grab land in a NATO country, then hed have decided to go nuclear. What other choices would he have? But as usual, Im just an idiot on the internet with no idea what I am talking about.
radius777
(3,635 posts)don't get. Putin/Russians are intimidated by NATO and know it will be the end of them if they only breathe on NATO territory.
Our 'experts' have long thought that appeasing Putin, by not letting nations like Ukraine and Georgia into NATO would stop Putin's aggressions. But all that has done is incentivize his aggression. Because they are not in NATO and he knows there not will be a response. He also knows that NATO's rule is that an applicant must have complete control of their borders. So Putin intentionally compromises the applicant's borders to prevent qualification.