General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump lawyer John Eastman says court will prove 'presidential criminality' if it rules against him
By Bob Brigham
Published March 04, 2022
The attorney who wrote the infamous "coup memo" describing how Donald Trump could attempt to stay in office after losing the 2020 presidential election is trying to stall court proceedings.
"Attorney John Eastman, the architect of Donald Trumps legal strategy to overturn the 2020 election, urged a federal judge Friday to slow down the Jan. 6 select committees push to obtain documents they say could show the former president criminally conspired to subvert the democratic process," Politico reported Friday.
The filing came after the Select Committee to Investigate the Jan. 6 Attack on the U.S. Capitol argued against Eastman's claims of attorney-client privilege as he attempted to quash a subpoena for 11,000 documents
https://www.rawstory.com/john-eastman-says-court-will-prove-trumps-presidential-criminality-if-it-rules-against-him/
And then this:
"Eastman argued that if the court does not quash his subpoena, it will be a finding that Trump committed crimes."
C_U_L8R
(45,003 posts)Eastman has lost the law and order script, if he ever had it.
Karadeniz
(22,528 posts)to prevent the course of justice. I bet the presiding judge skipped that course in law school...
2naSalit
(86,646 posts)So he's saying that they committed crimes and if the courts don't help them, they;ll be indicted which also means that all protections are mute because they committed crimes while engaged in their activities that brought us to this point.
Karadeniz
(22,528 posts)2naSalit
(86,646 posts)It's all pretzelogic.
Karadeniz
(22,528 posts)2naSalit
(86,646 posts)Just like the idea that Rs can't win elections unless they cheat.
malaise
(269,040 posts)They are all guilty
Mr. Ected
(9,670 posts)He goes and opens up his trap and removes all doubt.
Thomas Hurt
(13,903 posts)How is the judge going to do by making this decision?
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)the implicit argument here is that the president of the United States is above the law. That is a principle which needs to be rejected and discredited. It was a mistake for Ford to pardon Nixon; if he hadn't Eastman wouldn't be making this stupid fucking argument now.
Chainfire
(17,549 posts)FakeNoose
(32,644 posts)Eugene
(61,900 posts)/sarc
tanyev
(42,564 posts)edhopper
(33,584 posts)Garland will ignore that too.
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,293 posts)His memos were pure crap and this defense is really stupid