General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsan-anti-vax-judge-is-preventing-the-navy-from-deploying-a-warsh
Full headline: An Anti-Vax Judge Is Preventing the Navy From Deploying a Warship
This judge is out of hand and needs to be removed.
this moment, the United States Navy is preparing to deploy a 10,000-ton warship carrying 320 officers and sailors, along with missiles, torpedoes, and a mounted artillery gun. This ship, known as a guided-missile destroyer, defends the United States and its allies on the seas. Although its next mission remains secret, it may bolster American military presence in Europe as Russian aggression pushes the continent into war. But the Navy cannot currently deploy this warship, because it has lost trust in its commanding officer, an anti-vaxxer who has repeatedly disobeyed lawful orders, misled superiors, and allegedly exposed dozens of his crew to COVID-19 due to a refusal to get tested.
Brandons view is shared across the Navy. In Dwyers alarming declaration, the vice admiral explained that Doe would constitute a manifest national security concern if he remains a commanding officer. It is untenable that a subordinate commander may choose to disregard, modify, or half-heartedly execute a senior officers orders due to his or her personal beliefs, Dwyer testified. This insubordination degrades mission effectiveness and the ability of the strike group to perform its mission in the interest of U.S. national security.This situation is untenable. Already, a Texas judge, abetted by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, has freed nearly three dozen SEALs from the vaccine mandate, a decision that high-ranking officers say will put the world at risk. Now Merryday is holding back a warship from deploymentand the judicial resistance to military mandate is just beginning. These cases are on a fast-track to the Supreme Court. If the justices do not confirm that judges must respect the commander-in-chiefs lawful orders, thousands of other service members like Doe will unleash chaos on the armed forces.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/an-anti-vax-judge-is-preventing-the-navy-from-deploying-a-warship/ar-AAUCPpu?ocid=msedgntp&fbclid=IwAR3WL8Gblp3njGi0_qJhPeMVthJHrekH7Ip7maWnch0CtVKmYYiAChdHF9k
acantharchus
(48 posts)Nevilledog
(51,122 posts)Link to tweet
Mark Joseph Stern
@mjs_DC
An insubordinate anti-vaxxer is currently the commanding officer of a guided-missile destroyer. Navy leaders won't deploy the warship while he's in chargethey don't trust him.
But a judge won't let them reassign him, citing his "religious freedom."
slate.com
An Anti-Vax Judge Is Preventing the Navy From Deploying a Warship
Admirals want to remove an insubordinate anti-vaxxer from command of a destroyer. A judge wont let them.
3:15 PM · Mar 4, 2022
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2022/03/covid-vaccine-judge-navy-warship-religious-freedom.html
The headline is a bit confusing
tinymontgomery
(2,584 posts)Bev54
(10,053 posts)zaj
(3,433 posts)... actions, right? I mean, this guy can be assigned to be the highest ranking toilet scrubber at the Pentagon, right?
jmowreader
(50,560 posts)I would think this judge could be impeached for trying to overthrow the Navy, but good luck coming up with 17 Republican senators who give a flying fuck about the security of the United States.
JoanofArgh
(14,971 posts)This is insane.
Chainfire
(17,549 posts)haele
(12,660 posts)If your personal beliefs dictate you cannot perform your job, you are removed from that position. Maybe not out, but definitely off the ship and no longer in a position of command. And lying on an official leave request? That's a dishonorable discharge
Don't care what a civilian judge says about it.
Religious exemptions mean you go somewhere that it won't be an issue until it's time to re-,up or get out.
Haele
keithbvadu2
(36,829 posts)Republicans used to be against judicial activism.
Now they want their favorite judges to run our military.
BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)They love to hire judges who follow orders.
Wounded Bear
(58,670 posts)This wrong on so many levels. The military has its own justice system and a chain of command that shit like this is undermining.
BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)Does he have a photo of Putin on his bedside table?
keithbvadu2
(36,829 posts)Can the crew trust a CO whose integrity is doubted by his own chain of command?
The hypocrisy of non-judicial punishment given by him.
Failure to follow orders.
tinymontgomery
(2,584 posts)ChoppinBroccoli
(3,784 posts)Because when people from Southern Ohio say they're going to do the laundry, they say they're going to go put clothes "in the warsh." I thought maybe "deploying a warsh" meant the Navy was going to do the laundry. LOL
muriel_volestrangler
(101,321 posts)which everything points to being operationally necessary. It's not a question of "we want to punish them with a posting to the Aleutians", it's that they need a commander they and the ship can trust.
Hekate
(90,714 posts)bluecollar2
(3,622 posts)Appoint a new XO, muster all hands, approve immediate removal of any crew who oppose vaccination and then get underway.
Court martial the Captain for failure to obey a lawful order, throw him into the brig at Leavenworth and let the court sort it out.
Problem solved.