General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy can't we drone strike Russian forces?
My friend came up with this idea and I cant figure out why we couldnt do it: Cant we drone strike the Russians and simply claim, Its not us. Its the Ukrainians doing it with drones we gave them. Much better than using piloted air forces because it would be very bad to get a pilot captured. What do you all think?
WarGamer
(12,439 posts)USALiberal
(10,877 posts)Skittles
(153,150 posts)not THEM
PJMcK
(22,034 posts)First, American tech can be easily distinguished. The Russians would figure it out pretty quickly.
Second, it would be an act of war against Russia. Do you think the U.S. should do that?
Lastly, the battlefield attacks you suggest would not end the war. Instead, it would escalate it.
DenaliDemocrat
(1,476 posts)When they tried to hijack our election. That was an act of war and we should acknowledge and respond in kind.
underpants
(182,785 posts)We dont want to get into a shooting war with Russia for many reasons.
There are experts who knows whose is what and they would know.
AntiFascist
(12,792 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,585 posts)on DU for several days. I would like some info from a military expert.
mitch96
(13,895 posts)blowing up a rocket launcher.... The UKR drone pilots were llaughing their asses off when it blew.. Pretty spectacular..
m
https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/the-role-of-turkish-drones-in-ukraines-war-2799563
BigmanPigman
(51,585 posts)and a no fly zone is off the table still.
"But for these drones to be effective, they need to operate in an environment with no air threat."
"They may be able to hit scattered Russian equipment, Ulgen added, but are unlikely to reach the most important and best protected assets, particularly those stationed around the capital."
"Twenty drones is "just not enough the tip the tide of battle, even if they were highly effective," agreed Mark Cancian, of the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington."
mitch96
(13,895 posts)preforming to expectations. The UKR Air force is flying albeit with less planes than russia. I saw a vid the other day of a UKR SU24 ground attack plane hitting that convoy.
Every little bit helps I guess.
m
Karadeniz
(22,511 posts)reconnaissance, but those could expose their location.
doc03
(35,325 posts)Goonch
(3,607 posts)Last edited Fri Mar 4, 2022, 09:30 PM - Edit history (1)
Drones are playing a critical role in Ukraines military defense against the Russian invasion, but they will likely become more vulnerable as the war expands.
https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/how-ukraine-using-drones-against-russia
Cha
(297,156 posts)Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)Cha
(297,156 posts)TheFarseer
(9,322 posts)Why then, is it not an act of war for Germany to give Ukraine stinger missiles and whoever to give them javelin missiles? We could even give them the drones and were just piloting them or hell, just show the Ukrainians how to do it if it makes a big difference.
Although, some here are saying it wont work if Russia has air superiority.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)using weapons ourselves against Russia is quite something else.
TheFarseer
(9,322 posts)LonePirate
(13,417 posts)A three are a direct US engagement in a war with Russia that could easily escalate to a nuclear exchange with them. It's why the only no fly zone over Ukraine would be one established by Ukraine and not by the West.
BannonsLiver
(16,370 posts)And they figure our we're contributing American aircraft to the war effort?
Also, I suggest you google 'Bayraktar drones.'
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)TheFarseer
(9,322 posts)You just want to watch Putin kill them by the thousands and take away millions of peoples freedom?
iemanja
(53,031 posts)It's his decision, not Sherman A1. You have a problem with that, take it up with the White House.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)Americans (or other nationalities) by the thousands or have justification to cross into NATO (or other) countries? That is precisely what your brainstorming is suggesting. This war as bad as it is (and it is very bad) is at least for the moment contained, start adding in more than support and supplies you greatly increase the chances of it becoming more widespread very quickly.
TheFarseer
(9,322 posts)vs NATO. The Russian people would topple Putin quickly and the troops would surrender. It would be over quick. The only thing I would be worried about is Cyber attacks and if China jumped in. I really dont think anyone would follow orders to launch nukes but I understand you cant just count on that as POTUS.
Im not sure we should just hang back and let them reconstitute the USSR.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)Would be able to topple Putin and no nukes would be involved? Im not as confident as you seem to be.